http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/23/world/middleeast/23gulf.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin

February 23, 2007
Arab States, Wary of Iran, Add to Their Arsenals but Still Lean on the U.S.
By HASSAN M. FATTAH

ABU DHABI, United Arab Emirates, Feb. 22 — As fears grow over the 
escalating confrontation between Iran and the West, Arab states across 
the Persian Gulf have begun a rare show of muscle flexing, publicly 
advertising a shopping spree for new weapons and openly discussing their 
security concerns.

Typically secretive, the gulf nations have long planned upgrades to 
their armed forces, but now are speaking openly about them. American 
military officials say the countries, normally prone to squabbling, have 
also increased their military cooperation and opened lines of 
communication to the American military here.

Patriot missile batteries capable of striking down ballistic missiles 
have been readied in several gulf countries, including Kuwait, Saudi 
Arabia and Qatar, analysts say, and increasingly, the states have sought 
to emphasize their unanimity against Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

“There has always been an acknowledgment of the threat in the region, 
but the volume of the debate has now risen,” said one United Arab 
Emirates official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was 
not authorized to speak on the subject. “Now the message is there’s a 
dialogue going on with Iran, but that doesn’t mean I don’t intend to 
defend myself.”

The Persian Gulf monarchies and sheikdoms, mostly small and vulnerable, 
have long relied on the United States to protect them. The United States 
Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain; the United States Central Command is 
based in nearby Qatar; and the Navy has long relied on docking 
facilities in the United Arab Emirates, which has one of the region’s 
deepest water ports at Jebel Ali.

The United States, too, has begun a significant expansion of forces in 
the gulf, with a second United States aircraft carrier battle group led 
by the John C. Stennis now in the Persian Gulf and with minesweeping ships.

The expansion has helped calm fears among gulf governments that the 
United States could pull out of the region in the future, even as it has 
raised concerns about a potential American confrontation with Iran, 
accidental or intentional.

As tensions with Iran rise, many gulf countries have come to see 
themselves as the likely first targets of an Iranian attack. Some have 
grown more concerned that the United States may be overstretched 
militarily, many analysts say, while almost all the monarchies, flush 
with cash as a result of high oil prices, have sought to build a 
military deterrent of their own.

“The message is first, ‘U.S., stay involved here,’ and second, ‘Iran, we 
will maintain a technological edge no matter what,’ ” said Emile 
el-Hokayem, research fellow at the Henry L. Stimson Center, a research 
center based in Washington. “They are trying to reinforce the 
credibility of the threat of force.”

Military officials from throughout the region descended this week on the 
Idex military trade fair, a semiannual event that has become the 
region’s largest arms market, drawing nearly 900 weapons makers from 
around the world. They came ready to update their military capacities 
and air and naval defenses. They also came armed with a veiled message 
of resolve.

“We believe there is a need for power to protect peace, and strong 
people with the capability to respond are the real protectors of peace,” 
said Sheik Khalifa bin Zayed al-Nahyan, the president of the United Arab 
Emirates and ruler of the emirate of Abu Dhabi, at the exposition. “That 
is why we are keen to maintain the efficiency of our armed forces.”

The Persian Gulf has been a lucrative market for arms. Saudi Arabia, 
Kuwait and Oman spend up to 10 percent of their gross domestic product 
on the military, amounting to nearly $21 billion, $4 billion and $2.7 
billion, respectively, estimates John Kenkel, senior director of Jane’s 
Strategic Advisory Services.

If they follow through on the deals announced recently, it is estimated 
that countries like the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Oman and Saudi 
Arabia will spend up to $60 billion this year. The biggest buyer in 
2006, according to the defense industry journal Defense News, was Saudi 
Arabia, which has agreed to buy 72 Eurofighter Typhoon combat jets for 
$11 billion. It also has a $400 million deal to upgrade 12 Apache AH-64A 
helicopters to the Longbow standard. The kingdom also reportedly plans 
to acquire cruise missiles, attack helicopters and tanks, all for a 
total of $50 billion.

Kuwait reportedly bought 24 Apache Longbow helicopters, while the United 
Arab Emirates has continued to take delivery of 80 F-16 Block 60 
fighters, with plans to buy air tankers, missile defense batteries and 
airborne early warning systems. Bahrain ordered nine UH-60M Black Hawk 
helicopters in an estimated $252 million deal, while Oman reportedly 
bought 30 antitank rocket launchers in a $48 million purchase and is 
planning a naval overhaul.

“It is a message to enemies that ‘We are taking defense seriously,’ ” 
Mr. Kenkel said, emphasizing that the new arms were for deterrence.

“If the U.S. ever does pull back, these countries in the gulf have 
realized, they may have to fend for themselves,” Mr. Kenkel said. “As 
the Boy Scouts say, always be prepared.”

The most marked change is in the public nature of the acquisitions, 
which previously would have been kept secret, many analysts here said, 
itself a form of deterrence.

“They have been doing these kinds of purchases since the ’90s,” said 
Marwan Lahoud, chief executive of the European missile maker MBDA. “What 
has changed is they are stating it publicly. The other side is making 
pronouncements so they have to as well,” he said, speaking of Iran’s 
recent announcements about its weapons capacity.

Senior United States military officials say gulf countries have become 
more nervous as Iran has conducted naval maneuvers, especially near the 
Straits of Hormuz, the main artery through which two-fifths of the 
world’s oil reaches markets.

“A year ago you could have characterized the interaction with the 
Iranians as professional,” said Vice Adm. Patrick Walsh, departing 
commander of the Fifth Fleet. “What’s different today has been the 
number and amount of exercises and the proximity of those exercises to 
the Straits of Hormuz themselves.”

The exercises were among the reasons for the expansion of Navy forces in 
the region, he said, but have also raised alarm about the potential for 
accidents to lead to an unintended war.

Admiral Walsh said that American warships remained in international 
waters, and that Iranian and American ships kept close watch on one 
another. Some critics of the Bush administration have alleged that the 
increased military presence in the gulf risks igniting a conflict.

Admiral Walsh said the increased American presence was aimed at o 
reassuring gulf states that the United States remained committed to 
their security, but also welcomed their efforts to build deterrence.

“We have found that we need to be physically present to prevent such 
armed behavior,” he said of the Iranian maneuvers. “We’re mindful we’re 
not giving up any water, but also being careful not to take a 
provocative stance.”

+++




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/hOt0.A/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to