http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/a-step-to-the-right-a-slap-to-the-left/2007
/02/23/1171734017549.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1

A step to the right, a slap to the left

Nick Cohen was a leftie's leftie. In the 1970s his mother, a teacher and
former communist, refused to buy oranges from Portugal or Spain, which were
then ruled by fascist dictators. She banned her son from watching Disney on
television and blacklisted the Beano comic because it was printed by a
non-union firm.

A decade of Margaret Thatcher, two cruel recessions and mass unemployment
did nothing to douse Cohen's leftism. He went on Campaign for Nuclear
Disarmament marches and collected money for striking miners.

But it was in journalism that Cohen found his fire. In British left-wing
publications such as The Independent, New Statesman and The Observer, he
pounded away for years at standard left issues: housing, education,
corporate villainy. Attacking Tony Blair, he wrote, "was what got me out of
bed in the morning".

So, unsurprisingly, when the United States led an invasion of Afghanistan
after the attacks of September 11, 2001, Cohen was against it.
Anti-Americanism was justified, he wrote, when there was so "little about
modern America to be for".

But something happened to Cohen on the road from Kabul to Baghdad. By the
time the coalition of the willing invaded Iraq in 2003, he had turned
around. He now supported the invasion and said so in his Observer and New
Statesman columns, week after week.

There followed what he calls the most intense three years of thinking of his
life. Amazement at what he saw as the liberal left's failure to confront the
threat and reactionary nature of radical Islam led him to wider revelations
about the movements and people he has been connected to for most of his 45
years.

The result of his journey is What's Left? How Liberals Lost Their Way, an
exuberant, punchy, scornful polemic on how the radical idea went radically
wrong. To be published in Australia next week, it is already causing a fair
storm in Britain, where it came out three weeks ago and is already in its
fourth print run, with 15,000 sold.

The writers Martin Amis and Christopher Hitchens have lined up to praise it.
Predictably, the right loves it: a "splendid, passionate book" that caught
the best of conservative thought, wrote The Times columnist Daniel
Finkelstein. (The endorsement reminded Cohen, he writes on his website, of a
scene in Rosemary's Baby where the satanists hiss at Mia Farrow: "Join us!
It's easier that way!")

Just as predictably, many - though by no means all - on the left hate it. To
the feminist Beatrix Campbell it is "intemperate, petulant" abuse posing as
argument. Simplify and exaggerate is Cohen's approach, writes former New
Statesman editor Peter Wilby, an old friend of Cohen's who thinks "he is,
and always was, a political innocent".

But whatever is said about Cohen - and a Google search will turn up any
amount of vitriol - he insists he has not swerved right, like those American
former commies who turned neocons. Some old comrades might look the other
way when he passes in the street; he is no longer a leftie's leftie. But he
is adamant he is still a leftie.

"My book grew out of a vicious barney on the left that began after 9/11 and
grew from there," he says. "It's been like an 18th-century pamphlet war."
Cohen, a classic pamphleteer, seems to have relished it.

It is only noon but we are in the pub because Cohen, a nervy character with
a capacity for sudden, convulsive laughter, has insisted we leave the north
London cafe we met in so he can smoke. Over two pints and about 10
cigarettes he explains, with a rapid-fire delivery that resembles the style
of his book, why he wrote it.

The left has forgotten its core principles, he charges. It has abandoned its
commitment to democratic and human rights struggles in poorer countries. In
place of its old internationalism is an isolationist and narcissistic
obsession with the evils of Western corporations and governments - in
particular with the Great Satan, the United States.

As evidence, he tells the story of Hadi Saleh, to whom he dedicates the
book. Saleh was an Iraqi exile and trade unionist who, despite opposing the
war, went back to Iraq after the toppling of Saddam to try to build a union
movement. As a result, former members of Saddam's secret police murdered him
last year.

Cohen says there were very good reasons, as well as bad ones, to oppose the
war. But, he argues, once Baghdad had fallen, the left's duty was to form
alliances with Iraqi democrats trying to resist Baathists and Islamists.

Some did: the British Trades Union Congress supported Saleh's work. "They
have behaved brilliantly," Cohen says. "They opposed Bush and Blair but when
it came to showing solidarity and shipping aid to Iraq, they did it."

But they were the exception, he argues. "Your typical London publisher or
BBC editor" in the left-liberal elite would not support Saleh, if they even
knew he existed, because to do so would mean indirectly supporting Tony
Blair and George Bush, architects of an illegal war.

"Why isn't Hadi Saleh as famous as Nelson Mandela?" he demands. "Because no
one wants to know."

This is a generalisation, but it is that kind of sweeping book. What's Left?
is not merely or even mainly about Iraq. It is about a certain left-wing
tolerance for totalitarianism; about apologetics for Serbian concentration
camps and militant Islam. The Guardian columnist Martin Kettle wrote that it
was also about the left's "retreat from the street to the sofa".

Left is a fairly meaningless term, ranging from Leninists to liberals. In an
effort to define it, Cohen separates the far left, the old left - grouped
around trade unions - and what might be called the soft left of middle-class
progressives.

One of the left's great losses, he believes, has been the severance of the
last group from the working class. He blames it on the decline of the Labour
Party as a mass party, but also intellectuals' abandonment of the working
class when it failed to become the vehicle for the social transformation
they longed for.

Today, while academics bury their heads in racial and sexual identity
politics, the working class is seen as a reservoir of racism and homophobia,
he says. It has gone "from the salt of the earth to the scum of the earth in
three generations".

The book is also about the disappointment of middle-class liberals with
politics, even as - or perhaps because - politics delivered many of the
changes they demanded. In a sparkling passage, Cohen imagines going back 100
years and telling an audience of the liberal intelligentsia what the world
looks like today.

Women will have the vote, the time traveller says. Nearly all monarchies and
empires will be gone. Minority groups will have rights; machines will end
drudgery. Health care will be free, almost no newborns will die and most
people will live to 80.

"Your future has everything we have always wanted," the liberals will cry.
"So it has, you reply, which is why you will hate it."

But with the death of socialism, the left's disillusionment was complete,
Cohen writes. It no longer proposed alternatives to the democratic,
free-market state. It was no longer for anything, merely against. What it
was against most was the one superpower that the fall of the Berlin Wall
left standing.

"My anti-Americanism has become almost uncontrollable," wrote the English
novelist Margaret Drabble. "It has possessed me, like a disease . I detest
Disneyfication, I detest Coca-Cola, I detest burgers."

Drabble wrote that after the Iraq war. But Cohen finds similar sentiment
well before the war, including just after September 11.

"American bond traders, you may say, are as innocent and as undeserving of
terror as Vietnamese or Iraqi peasants," wrote his friend, Peter Wilby, in
the New Statesman. "Well, yes and no.

"If America seems a greedy and overwhelming power, that is partly because
its people have willed it. They preferred George Bush to both Al Gore and
Ralph Nader. These are harsh judgements but we live in harsh times."

Cohen now sees Wilby's view as "morally bankrupt", yet at the time he might
have sympathised. What changed him, he says, was talking to Iraqi exiles in
Britain about the monstrous nature of Saddam's regime. He came to believe
that any plan to rid Iraq of Saddam deserved support. Not all the exiles
backed the invasion, but what amazed Cohen was that when debate over the war
began, few on the left showed interest in their stories.

Where were the banners, he asks, opposing Saddam as well as the US? Why did
the decent left allow the then Labour MP George Galloway - who in 1994 flew
to Baghdad to salute Saddam's "courage, strength [and] indefatigability" -
to lead the million-strong anti-war rally of February 2003?

Cohen's critics say he tars the broad left with the sins of its extreme
wing. They say most anti-war protesters did not endorse Saddam or Islamism
by opposing the war. They just thought it was a dumb idea that would kill a
lot of people and inflame, not reduce, terrorism. That turned out to be a
reasonable assumption.

Kettle writes that the book "ought to force anyone on the left to think
carefully about where their movement has ended up in the modern world". But
he also thinks Cohen and other war supporters have their own lessons to face
up to.

"They were right about many things," Cohen says, perhaps a little ruefully,
about what he calls the sensible anti-war left. Still, "I would not turn the
clock back and put Saddam in power. That strikes me as an incredible thing
to suggest."

He thinks that the left must stop dwelling on the decision to invade and who
was to blame, and look at what to do now. In this he sounds a little like
Blair, and Cohen would not deny it. "I am a lot softer towards him than I
was," he says. "This Labour Government has spent a fortune on public
services and redistributed a lot of money. Generally, it is probably about
as left-wing as you can get in a modern democracy."

What's Left? is bound to provoke passionate responses, many hostile. Will it
also spur, even shame, people on the left to renew the internationalism
Cohen believes it so desperately needs? The author, for one, believes it
will.

"I don't think radical Islam is going to go away," Cohen says. "I am trying
to save the best left-wing traditions of internationalism, democratic
socialism, anti-fascism, feminism. Because I think we're going to need
them."



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/4It09A/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/TySplB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to