Exclusive: Embassies in Teheran prepare escape plans

By AMIR MIZROCH <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





Mar. 23, 2007 0:57 | Updated Mar. 23, 2007 1:18




Several foreign embassies in Teheran are updating their emergency
evacuation plans should a Western or Israeli attack on Iran occur.

According to foreign sources, foreign diplomats believe a possible
attack would take place before the end of 2007. By that time, Iran might
have enough enriched uranium to cause a humanitarian and environmental
catastrophe from radioactive fallout should its nuclear facilities be
damaged or destroyed in an attack.

Embassies in all countries generally have evacuation plans for their
staff, but foreign sources describe the general atmosphere in Iran as
one of heightened preparedness. Recently, several diplomatic missions
based in Teheran have begun to reassess their plans, and embassies
without permanent security officers have requested them.

Embassy experts reportedly are testing various evacuation options and
logistics, such as timing routes to different destinations by different
types of vehicles. The plans include evacuation for all staff.

Foreign sources say both the United States and Israel, who accuse Iran
of wanting to develop nuclear weapons, want to give diplomatic efforts
aimed at stopping Iran's nuclear drive the best possible chance to
succeed.

But according to these sources, should the West or Israel feel that the
time needed for diplomatic efforts is longer than the time it would take
for Iran to obtain nuclear independence, they are likely to strike at
Iran's main nuclear facilities before the damage done by such an attack
would cause serious radiation fallout. Such fallout would likely kill
many civilians and render some parts of Iran uninhabitable for an
undetermined period of time.

According to this logic, the timing of such an attack would take place
just before Iran has enriched an amount of weapons-grade material that,
if damaged, would cause such a humanitarian and environmental
catastrophe, it could be construed as a nuclear attack.

The assessments posit that Israel and the US will try to delay an attack
until the last moment due to the expected Iranian counterattack and
regional deterioration.

Similar dilemmas over timing were faced by Israel before the 1981 raid
that destroyed Saddam Hussein's reactor at Osirak. According to "The
Raid on the Osirak Nuclear Reactor," an article by researcher Avi Hein,
the Israeli cabinet in 1981 received word that "a shipment of 90
kilograms of enriched uranium fuel rods is expected from France to Iraq,
ready for radiation." The moment the rods would be placed in the
reactor, there would be a danger of radiation fallout if the reactor was
attacked. This was the decisive factor for deputy prime minister Yigael
Yadin, who had initially opposed the plan to attack Osirak, but changed
his mind after receiving the news about the fuel rods, Hein wrote.

According to other published sources on the Osirak strike, Israel felt
any raid had to take place well before nuclear fuel was loaded to
prevent radioactive contamination.

It is now known that during the strike preparations, one question
affecting the timing was the estimated date the reactor would become
"live," after which a strike could cause radiation fallout on civilians.

In the current standoff with Iran, US pressure on many countries and
multinational corporations to divest from Teheran is bearing fruit. But
in the final analysis, Iran is not seen likely to stop its nuclear
program, and UN sanctions are regarded as likely to take too long to
have an effect.

Should it be attacked, Iran is expected to launch missiles against
Israel and an offensive against US forces in the Middle East. Teheran is
also expected to activate Hizbullah in a full assault against Israel.
Israeli security services also expect attacks on Jewish interests and
institutions worldwide.



Syria is still deciding if it will go "all the way" with Iran, or
abandon its one friend in the world and return to the international
fold. Syria's potential role in such a regional conflagration is
undetermined. Saudi Arabia has been exerting consistent and mounting
pressure on both Syria and Iran to change course.

Former Iranian president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani is making political
moves within Iran's Supreme Council to limit the power of President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - who many in Iran feel is out of the control of the
ruling elite.

At first, the ayatollahs acquiesced to Ahmadinejad's foreign policy line
- which has at its core the drive for nuclear power, the ambition to
replace Saudi Arabia as Islam's "core state," and the stated aim to
destroy Israel - because of the former mayor of Teheran's wide popular
support. For approximately the past year, there has been a noticeable
growing concern among the ruling elite that Ahmadinejad is slipping out
of their control, even though there is little chance he could take over
supreme power and authority.



 
<http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879153851&pagename=JPost\
%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
<http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1173879153851&pagename=JPost\
%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull> >







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to