Iran Is Pushing Its Luck



[Opinion] With seizure of British marines, Tehran might be going too far

Alan Mota (al0021)



Published 2007-03-24 17:51 (KST)

On March 23 the British government announced that 15 marines from the
British navy were seized by Iranian forces while making routine
inspections on merchant ships going to Iraq. According to the British
government, they were outside Iranian waters when the Iranian forces
escorted their ships to national waters and detained them. The Iranian
government has so far refused to speak on the issue, and news agencies
throughout the world have their reports based solely on the British
minister of defense's side of the story.

This confrontation -- if it can be described this way -- has happened in
one of the most tense moments so far in the Iran-West relationship. A
draft resolution on Iran's nuclear program in the U.N. was finally
scheduled for voting, and it's supposed to happen on March 24.

The speeches on both sides -- the Western, mostly America and Britain,
and the Iranian -- have been getting harsher. And while the more radical
types don't rule out the hypothesis of war, most people know that, for
lack of feasibility more than for peaceful intentions, an attack on Iran
is out of question.

But everything has a limit. The religious leader of Iran -- Ayatollah
Khamenei -- already stated that if a resolution against Iran's nuclear
program -- which he would consider "illegal" -- is passed, that would
open room for Iran to act the same way.

"We have acted according to international norms [in the nuclear sphere]
until recently, but if they [the West] take illegal measures, we will
have a commensurate response," Khamenei said.

Obviously, these are considered provocations by the Western powers,
which prompts them to act harder. However, even though Iran as well as
the U.S. and Britain will refuse to admit it's part of the political
game --- there's has been a certain "accord" that no country will go
past threats or a few sanctions.

Although such an "accord" probably didn't predict military intervention.
On one side, the U.S. army raided an Iranian consulate in the Iraqi city
of Arbil, seizing computers and documents and detaining Iranian staff.
Now, with the Iranian bust on British marines, the situation is
escalating to a point of retaliation after retaliation, and no one knows
where this might end.

The British Foreign Secretary had a meeting with the Iranian ambassador
in the U.K., a "brisk but polite" meeting, according to her, where she
made clear that Britain wants the immediate return of their men. But
this doesn't mean that the tension was reduced, even though it's very
unlikely that the Iranian government will mistreat or torture the
British soldiers.

The consequences of the Iranian act have also gone outside the political
sphere. The price of the crude oil barrel rose 1 percent on March 23 to
US$62 a barrel, which totals a 4.5 percent rise on the May oil contracts
only this week. Even though the prices are still lower than a year ago
-- 2.6 percent --, this was the highest close for a front-month contract
since Dec. 22. As it is widely known, the oil market is one of the most
sensitive to the ups and downs of the unpredictable political scene in
the middle east. And unfortunately, as it was seen in the 1970s and
1980s, they're usually not wrong.

It's still too early to get any conclusion out of Iran's action,
especially because no Iranian authorities have spoken so far (at the
time of writing), regardless of the British authorities' cries for the
release of the seized sailors. But it is clearly an act with a tint of
political challenge, especially with the voting of the draft resolution
on the near horizon.

Iran is said to be taking on the American/British stalemate on Iraq,
pushing further and further for their interests with no fear of
retaliation, a strategy knowingly used also by North Korea. This has
been shifting attentions from Iraq to Iran, and the Iranian government
might be unwillingly putting itself into place as the "new enemy" in the
international political scene, ahead of its "evil axis" partner North
Korea.

This way, Iran might be pushing its luck against the immobility of the
Western powers, and this can have dire consequences for Iranian
citizens, the world markets and, ultimately, world peace.



 
<http://english.ohmynews.com/ArticleView/article_view.asp?no=352096&rel_\
no=1
<http://english.ohmynews.com/ArticleView/article_view.asp?no=352096&rel_\
no=1> >





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to