Page Printed from: 
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/the_muslim_brotherhoods_propag.html  at 
April 02, 2007 - 07:38:36 AM EDT

AMERICAN  THINKER

April 02, 2007  

The Muslim Brotherhood's  Propaganda Offensive
By Rachel Ehrenfeld and Alyssa A.  Lappen

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) is heightening its U.S.  propaganda offensive in 
advance of the 2008 presidential elections, taking  advantage of the political 
uncertainty and opposition to the current  Administration's defense policies 
against radical Muslim terrorist  organizations and states. 
 
Incredibly, "Hear  Out the Muslim Brotherhood," an op-ed in the Boston Globe on 
 Sunday March 25, portrayed the outlawed Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood as a  
reforming tool to promote democracy and stability there and throughout the  
Middle East, and praised the MB for "surviving" decades of oppression by  
previous Egyptian regimes. 

However, a referendum on March 26, 2007 in Egypt banned "the creation of 
political  parties based on religion." The MB, the biggest opposition group 
boycotted the  vote and later criticized the results because of low voter 
turnout.

The  MB, which is illegal in Egypt, Libya and Syria, operates in at least 70  
countries. It is busy preparing the ground to establish Islamic global  
dominance, successfully using Western democracy to legally inject itself into  
the political process, while using the free media to portray the Brothers as  
reformers and protesting any attempt to limit their subversive activities.  
Indeed, even the Wall Street Journal agrees  that in Egypt the MB "has become 
something of a default opposition."  Criticizing Egypt's President Hosni 
Mubarak for the latest crackdown on the  MB, the Journal declared, "Not even a 
modern-day Pharaoh can forbid  people from gathering in mosques."

The Journal recognized that  "free elections are no guarantee that liberals 
will win." The Hamas takeover  of the Palestinian Authority is a recent 
reminder. But since "[P]ast attempts  to suppress the Brotherhood have only 
increased its popularity," the  Journal disapproves of Mubark's crackdown, and 
laments the U.S. "weak  criticism," since "tolerating authoritarian regimes in 
the interest of  "stability" ensures that liberals will always lose." Similar 
arguments were  made by Human Rights Watch, which also demanded the  immediate 
release of hundreds of Muslim Brothers from Egyptian  prisons.
 
In addition to the Globe, Foreign Affairs and the New York Times have  lately 
also run apologias for the Muslim Brotherhood. In "Strategic Thinking  about 
the Muslim Brotherhood," published in the March/April edition of  Foreign 
Affairs, Robert Leiken and Steven Brooke argued that 
"the  differences between the Brotherhood and the jihadists abound, and it is  
imperative to differentiate them...[thus] we should begin to explore whether  
the moderate current of the Muslim Brotherhood is a worthy  interlocutor."

Meanwhile, The New York Times is busy  whitewashing one of the MB's most 
corrosive European leaders, Tariq Ramadan, who was barred last September from 
the  U.S. because he funded Hamas. Ramadan's protest was  published last 
October in The Washington  Post. In his op-ed,  Ramadan declared that unlike 
the  enlightened Europeans who allow criticism, especially regarding the war on 
 terrorism, "the U.S. government's paranoia has evolved far beyond a  fear of 
particular individuals and taken on a much more insidious form: the  fear of 
ideas." But Ramadan's "ideas" and influence among Muslims are nothing  to 
sneeze at. Indeed, his association with and direct  involvement with al-Qaeda 
operatives in Europe, Africa and the Middle  East is well documented by Spanish 
and French courts.

That information,  however, seem to have escaped the attention of U.S. media 
outlets that keep  singing Ramadan praises. Lately, The New York Times seems to 
be serving  as Ramadan's mouthpiece.

A lengthy favorable profile of Ramadan's  appeared in the February 4, 2007, NYT 
 Sunday Magazine. At the end of the 5,181 word article, "Tariq Ramadan  Has an 
Identity Issue," Ian Burama concluded: "Ramadan offers a  different way... 
values that are as universal as those of the European  Enlightenment... these 
values are neither secular, nor always liberal, but  they are not part of a 
holy war against Western democracy either. His politics  offer an alternative 
to violence, which, in the end, is reason enough to  engage with him, 
critically, but without fear." Further arguments on  Ramadan's behalf were made 
in the April 1, 2007 New York Times Book Review, by Stephanie Giry. Praising  
Ramadan's latest book -- tellingly titled "In the Footsteps of the Prophet" --  
Giry recommends,

"Taking him [Ramadan] literally could be one way to  get beyond his critics' 
accusations, as well as the paranoid legalism of the  State Department."
Moreover, she finds "Ramadan's universalist, apolitical  view of Islam" as the 
"the pragmatic resolution of social  frictions."

This willful blindness to Ramadan's agenda to globalize the  Shari'a and 
establish the Caliphate is so prevalent that the media apparently  chose to 
ignore his arrest on March 13, 2007, at Charles de Gaulle  International 
Airport, for "insulting a public agent." The incident was  reported only by the 
Terror Finance Blog,  while the international media kept mum. A week later, a 
local Swiss newspaper  Tribune de Genève, reported the story  with Ramadan's 
complaint that, "he had to spend the whole night in a dirty  cell because of 
the police ‘overzealousness'." Ramadan, who faces up to 6  months of 
imprisonment and a fine of €7,500, is expected to be sentenced by a  criminal 
court on April 6.

And Ramadan does not work alone. Feeding his  arguments, the MB's Ikhwan 
English website, developed in late 2006, runs  articles promoting the 
"benevolence" of the movement and the MB's " reform and moderation," and 
praising multiculturalism as  the way to proliferate Islam. 
 
On the MB Arabic website, however,  their leader Mahdi Akef, in his February 22 
weekly address, reassured his  followers that "the jihad will lead to smashing 
Western  civilization and replacing it with Islam which will dominate the  
world." Moreover, Akef decreed that in the event that Muslims cannot  achieve 
this goal in the near future, "Muslims are obliged to continue  the jihad that 
will cause the collapse of Western civilization and the  ascendance of the 
Muslim civilization on its ruins."

Akef further  declared that "the Western offensive against Islam," is failing. 
His evidence:  "the failure the American war machine to break the rock of the 
Iraqi  opposition, the difficulties facing the coalition forces in Afghanistan, 
and  the military defeat of the Israeli armed forces in Lebanon and against the 
 Palestinians." Hence, Akef called on the Arabs and Muslims to continue their  
terrorist attacks against the U.S. and Israel "until they withdraw completely  
from the Middle East." 
 
Akef's decrees and ideas of global  Islamic domination are not new. They were 
established by Muslim Brotherhood  founder Hassan al-Banna in 1928, and can be 
found on  ummah.net/ikhwan. The MB states its goals under the heading  
"Establishing the Islamic government," outlining  the specific guidelines to 
achieve them. The MB instructions  include: "Preparing the society is achieved 
through plans for:  spreading the Islamic culture, the possible media means, 
mosques, and Da'awa  [inviting others to Islam, an obligatory duty for 
Muslims], work in public  organizations such as syndicates, parliaments, 
student  unions." 

Indeed, the U.S.-designated terrorist organization  Hamas, which is the 
Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, took over  the Palestinian 
Authority in January 2006, and gave the MB its first field  test of grabbing 
power via democracy, to then enforce Shari'a law.  
 
Hamas' "accommodation" of the unity government ratified on March 17, without 
recognizing Israel and reiterating the  Palestinian's "right" to "violently 
resist the occupation," is akin to the  Iraqi's right to violently resist the 
U.S. and U.K. forces there. A ringing  endorsement was published by the U.S. 
based pro-Hamas, virulently  anti-American, al-Jazeerah Info, on March 26.  
Indeed, defeating Israel, the U.S. and the U.K. serve the overriding MB  
purpose of overthrowing all secular governments and imposing global Islamic  
law (Shari'a). 
 
Evidence of Muslim Brotherhood violence,  repression and authoritarianism upon 
taking power is abundant in the  Hamas-controlled Palestinian Authority. A 
recent report by The Australian, documents the "Strict  observance of Sunni 
Islam, through the rigid enforcement of radical Islamic  law, espoused by the 
global jihad network that follows the bin Laden  worldview,"
which has taken hold there. 
 
In February, six  Rafah pharmacists were attacked for selling Viagra to youths. 
And in March, at  least eight women accused of immoral behavior and 
fraternizing with men  outside their immediate families were hunted down and 
assassinated because  "death gave them honor that their conduct in life had 
not." 
 
A  ninth victim who survived multiple gunshots stated from her hospital bed 
that  she recognized her tormentors as members of the Hamas executive force. 
"So  long as Hamas is in Gaza, the situation will keep developing," she  stated.
 
Since Hamas, apart from Al Qaeda, is the most active  branch of the Muslim 
Brotherhood, stating, "The Brotherhood has consistently  demonstrated a 
long-term commitment to working peacefully..." is evidently  false and 
misleading. 

Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld is author of  Funding Evil; How Terrorism is Financed-and 
How to Stop It, Director of  American Center for Democracy, (ACD) and a  member 
of the Committee on the Present  Danger. Alyssa A. Lappen is a senior fellow at 
the ACD.

Page  Printed from: 
http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/04/the_muslim_brotherhoods_propag.html  at 
April 02, 2007 - 07:38:36 AM EDT 







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to