http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Printable.aspx?GUID={DE9BC115-7388-46A3
-8ED9-813BD71AEA25}
 

Islam's Love-Hate Relationship with Homosexuality 

By Serge
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/authors.aspx?GUID=de9bc115-7388-46a3-8
ed9-813bd71aea25> Trifkovic
FrontPageMagazine.com | 1/24/2003 

 

One in a series of excerpts adapted by Robert Locke from Dr. Serge
Trifkovic's new book 

 
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1928653111/centerforthest01A/103-727
4331-7038203> The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically-Incorrect Guide to
Islam

"This sin, the impact of which makes one's skin crawl, which words cannot
describe, is evidence of perverted instincts, total collapse of shame and
honor, and extreme filthiness of character and soul. The heavens, the Earth
and the mountains tremble from the impact of this sin. The angels shudder as
they anticipate the punishment of Allah to descend upon the people who
commit this indescribable sin." (
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#I> 1)

There are many sins in Islam that may fit this description, from idolatry,
atheism, and apostasy, to drunkenness, adultery, and questioning the divine
origin of the Koran. In this particular instance it refers to homosexuality,
for which a death sentence remains on the statute books and is enforced in
several Islamic countries.

In Saudi Arabia on April 16, 2001, five homosexuals were sentenced to 2,600
lashes and 6 years in prison, and four others to 2,400 lashes and 5 years'
imprisonment for "deviant sexual behavior." Amnesty International
subsequently reported that six men were executed on charges of deviant
sexual behavior, some of which were related to their sexual orientation, but
it was uncertain whether the six men who were executed were among the nine
who were sentenced to flogging and imprisonment in April (2
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#II> ).

It is difficult to establish precisely the number of homosexuals that have
been executed in Iran since the Islamic revolution in 1979, since not all
sentences are widely publicized, but estimates range from several hundred to
4,000 (3 <http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#III>
).  According to Amnesty International, at least three homosexual men and
two lesbians were publicly beheaded in January 1990. The Islamic Penal Law
Against Homosexuals, approved in July 1991 and ratified in November of that
year, is simple. Article 110: "Punishment for sodomy is killing; the Sharia
judge decides on how to carry out the killing." Article 129: "Punishment for
lesbianism is one hundred (100) lashes for each party." Article 131: "If the
act of lesbianism is repeated three times and punishment is enforced each
time, the death sentence will be issued the fourth time."

While the Taliban ruled Afghanistan, it regularly executed homosexuals.
Islamic jurists in Kabul and Kandahar only differed on the method of
killing. One group of scholars believed the condemned should be taken to the
top of the highest building in the city and hurled to their deaths, while
others advocated placing them in a pit next to a wall which was to be
toppled on them, so that they are buried alive. Both methods were solidly
grounded in authoritative tradition, and both were applied. At least five
men convicted of sodomy by Afghanistan's sharia courts had been "placed next
to walls by Taliban officials and then buried under the rubble as the walls
were toppled upon them." In one such incident, three homosexuals were
punished thus while Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar watched along with
thousands of spectators. After the 30-minute waiting period, the three men
were still alive, but two died the next day. What became of the third is
unknown (4 <http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#IV>
).  The punishment by stoning is derived from the Koranic account of Sodom's
destruction by a "rain of stones," which was itself the product of
Mohammed's misunderstanding of the Hebrew story of "fire and brimstone,"
i.e. sulfur: 

"We also (sent) Lut: he said to his people: "Do ye commit lewdness such as
no people in creation (ever) committed before you? For ye practice your
lusts on men in preference to women: ye are indeed a people transgressing
beyond bounds." And his people gave no answer but this: they said, "drive
them out of your city: these are indeed men who want to be clean and pure!"
But We saved him and his family, except his wife: she was of those who
lagged behind. And We rained down on them a shower (of brimstone): then see
what was the end of those who indulged in sin and crime!" (5
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#V> )

The Koranic claim that homosexuality was unknown before it first appeared in
Sodom is a uniquely Islamic concept; so is the notion that its destruction
was exclusively due to the homosexual practices of its inhabitants, a
departure from the Hebrew Scriptures. In addition to the Koran many hadiths
or authoritative traditional sayings mention liwat, (homosexual intercourse)
e.g. "When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes," and "Kill
the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to (6
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#VI> )."
Mohammed's first successor Abu Bakr reportedly had a homosexual burned at
the stake. The fourth caliph, Mohammed's son-in-law Ali, ordered a sodomite
thrown from the minaret of a mosque. Others he ordered to be stoned. One of
the earliest and most authoritative commentators on the Koran, Ibn 'Abbas
(died 687) blended both approaches into a two-step execution in which "the
sodomite should be thrown from the highest building in the town and then
stoned." Later it was decided that if no building were tall enough, the he
could be shoved off a cliff. Regardless of the exact method, 

"Moslem Jurists agree that, if proven of guilt, both of them should be
killed. However, jurists differ on the methodology of capital punishment (7
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#VII> )."  

There are seven countries in the world that carry the death penalty for
homosexual acts, and all of them justify this punishment with sharia.

In Moslem nations, the suppression of liaison between men and women outside
prearranged wedlock has produced frustrated sexual tension that has sought
and found release in homosexual intercourse through the centuries. Those
denied access to licit sexuality have sought and obtained outlets that have
produced chronic contradiction between normative morality and social
realities. Male and female prostitution and same-sex practices - including
abuse of young boys by their older male relatives - have been rampant in
Islamic societies from the medieval to the modern period. It should be
emphasized that those societies stress a distinction between the sexual act
itself, which was deemed acceptable, and emotional attachment, which was
unpardonable:

"Sexual relations in Middle Eastern societies have historically articulated
social hierarchies, that is, dominant and subordinate social positions:
adult men on top; women, boys and slaves below (8
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#VIII> )."  

A Moslem who is the active partner in sexual relations with other men is not
considered a "homosexual" (the word has no pre-modern Arabic equivalent);
quite the contrary, his sexual domination of another man may even confer a
status of hyper-masculinity. He may use other men as substitutes for women,
and at the same time have great contempt for them.  This depraved view of
sex, common in mainstream Moslem societies, is commonly found in the West
only in prisons. In all cases it is the presence of love, affection, or
equality among sexual partners that is intolerable. Equality in sexual
relations is unimaginable in Islam, whether heterosexual or homosexual. Sex
in Islamic societies has never been about mutuality between partners, but
about the adult male's achievement of pleasure through domination.

Historically, this state of affairs was not concealed from Western observers
who were fascinated, shocked, and often attracted by the outward appearances
of rampant, barely concealed pederasty. By 1800, a European traveler to
Egypt wrote: 

"The inconceivable inclination which has dishonored the Greeks and Persians
of antiquity constitutes the delight, or, more properly speaking the infamy
of the Egyptians ... the contagion has seized the poor as well as the rich."


The "contagion" in question was spelled out more bluntly by an earlier
writer, Thomas Sherley, describing the Turks: 

"For their Sodommerye they use it soe publiquely and impudentlye as an
honest Christian woulde shame to companye his wyffe as they do with their
buggeringe boys (9
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#IX> )."  

A 17th century French visitor to the Middle East went so far as to claim
that Moslems were bisexual by nature, and many male authors gave
descriptions of "licentiousness" (lesbianism) among women in harems and bath
houses. Homosexuality became known to the English as the "Persian" or
"Turkish" vice. 

This peculiar aspect of the Middle East has never entirely disappeared. The
sight of men, even soldiers in uniform, strolling along a street hand in
hand, strikes first-time visitors as extraordinary even today. The Moslem
world enjoyed a reputation as a haven for sex with boys and men well into
the twentieth century. The proclivities of many Western authors like Gustave
Flaubert, Oscar Wilde, or Andre Gide, reflected the pederast and homosexual
attractions of the Islamic world; the fascination continues in the "gay
culture" of our own time:

But the bottom line - and it's coming from a devout bottom - is that there's
still something extremely sensual and potent about the image of the Islamic
male. You only have to compare the stiff, asexual frigidity of Bush and his
bookmarmish wife with the moist-eyed, sensitive and soft-spoken quality of
the bearded Bin Laden, feminine yet virile, with his multiple wives and vast
progeny, to grasp the difference (10
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#X> ). 

The author of this passage, a self-confessed promiscuous homosexual, has
intuited something important, and dangerous. Excessively doting, downtrodden
mothers fixated on their offspring, and aloof, mostly distant and
domineering fathers, create preconditions for what is known in clinical
psychology as the "lost object homosexuality," as opposed to the pre-Oedipal
polyformous homosexuality, which is "love for men." The cry for the missing
father, that emanates across the Moslem world into the endless void from a
hundred thousand minarets five times each day, can never be answered. The
hatred that motivates Bin Laden and his "feminine yet virile" followers is
not the normal aggressiveness of the child for the father at the Oedipal
stage, which can be mediated and managed, but hard-core psychotic
homosexuality of the son abandoned by his father, a near-incurable condition
that can lead to homicidal, delusional paranoia.

This condition is well known to the practitioners of clinical psychology and
psychoanalysis in Great Britain, where thousands of sons of upper and
upper-middle-class families end up in neo-Islamic establishments known as
Public Schools. It is not too far-fetched to conclude that British
Islamophilia under Disraeli and after was not merely due to the usual game
of balancing the powers:

"I sometimes wonder if there is not some horrifying attraction, especially
for English boys brought up in a public school, to the brutal manliness that
regards sodomitic rape as an expression of virility. In any event, a series
of Anglo-Saxon males who have gone in search of their manhood found it in
Islamic culture: Sir Richard Burton, T.E. Lawrence, and Pasha Club are at
the head of a large pack, whose rear is brought up by the academic
camp-followers and foundation executives who find, in their defense of
Islam, the excuse for their hatred of Jews (11
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=5704#XI> )." 

Men and women have been created different, and the recognition of those
differences is essential in any society that does not want to follow the
path of post-modern depravity. The denial of that difference is essential in
the Faustian experiment to which the West is subjecting itself, and those
who do not wish to partake in the proceedings may find Islam's frank
admission of difference between sexes alluring; but that is the lure of
dementia as the cure for cancer.  Islam has found the opposite extreme of
the modern West's bed-hopping unisex feminism, and has found it equally a
source of opposite, though equally poisonous, pathologies.  The traditional
Western view, a balance between sexual equality and sexual difference,
between freedom and restraint, is the best answer.  Islam's problem of
homosexuality, a reflection of the deeper psychosis endemic to the Islamic
world view, illustrates a problem that cannot be solved short of Islam's
thorough and comprehensive reform and revision. 

Footnotes:

1. Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Fawzan, The Evil Sin of Homosexuality
http://www.islamweb.net/english/family/sociaffair/socaff-84.html

2. Associated Press, April 16, 2001.

3. http://www.iranian.com/Letters/1999/September/gay.html

4. Amnesty International report, May 1998

5. 7:80-84

6. Further examples are listed at
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_isla.htm

7. http://www.jamaat.org/qa/homo.html

8. Bruce Dunne, "Power and Sexuality in the Middle East," Middle East
Report, Spring 1998.

9. Brian Whitaker in The Guardian, November 19, 2001
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Print/0,3858,4302213,00.html

10. http://www.brucelabruce.com/Moslem/right.html

11. Th. Fleming, Chronicles (1999), op. cit.


  _____  

Serge Trifkovic received his PhD from the University of Southampton in
England and pursued postdoctoral research at the Hoover Institution at
Stanford. His past journalistic outlets have included the BBC World Service,
the Voice of America, CNN International, MSNBC, U.S. News & World Report,
The Washington Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Times of London, and
the Cleveland Plain Dealer. He is foreign affairs editor of Chronicles. 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to