http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2007/09/john-bolton-looks-at-new-un-season.ht
ml



John
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Er/YidWithLid/%7E3/160884046/john-bolton-look
s-at-new-un-season.html> Bolton Looks at the New UN Season 




Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is just the first act in an annual NYC tradition-- the
circus is in town. Its the annual march of tyrants and dictators at the UN.
For the next few days creeps of all kinds will be driving up First Avenue in
Manhattan with great fanfare to bash the United States in speeches to the
United Nations General Assembly. Its really nothing new, it has happened in
Democratic Administrations and Republican ones. As UN Ambassador John Bolton
had to sit through this circus. Here is his preview of this years circus
season. 

 
<http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=YTkzMDM5OTQwMzNmZTBiOGUwMTAzYzM0
ZDMzYWUwZjY=> Big Apple Theater
The annual assembling. 
By Stephen Spruiell

It's that time of year again: time for the world's most notorious
human-rights violators to visit the United States and denounce it on its own
soil. The annual meeting of the United Nations General Assembly begins in
New York City on Tuesday. At National Review Online, we asked former U.N.
ambassador John Bolton to make sense of it all for us.

First thing to keep in mind, Bolton explains, is that although dozens,
maybe over 100 heads of state and government will be [at the U.N. this
week], along with practically every foreign minister there is, what happens
in the General Assembly is nothing but theater. Other than watching [Iranian
president Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad perform, or [Venezuelan president] Hugo
Chavez, or take your pick, there's no serious business involved there.

Even though the U.N. General Assembly is little more than a stage for world
leaders to perform upon, sometimes those performances can yield substantial
results. Last year, when Hugo Chavez spoke, Bolton says, he spoke the day
after Bush, and he said, "The devil was here before me. I can still smell
the sulfur."

That was critically important to helping us stop Venezuela from getting a
non-permanent seat on the Security Council, because, just what a clownish
performance that was, it showed what a problem Venezuela would have been for
two years,Bolton says. So that's why the theater of the General Assembly
will possibly tell us some things, but it's not where anything actually
happens.

That doesn't mean that world leaders won't be pursuing serious business this
week, only that most of it will take place behind the scenes in bilateral or
multilateral meetings on subjects that typically are hardly related to the
U.N. at all,Bolton says. They're taking place because everybody's in New
York, and you can have a lot of meetings with everybody concentrated in one
spot.

To the extent that the United States engages the U.N. this week, Bolton
says, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice will be focused on two issues: the
Arab-Israeli peace process and Iran's nuclear program.

Rice is determined to make this Middle East peace process come alive, which
I find hard to understand, Bolton says. What Condi wants to do is gin up
support for this October regional peace conference and for what she has
clearly made a priority, which is the resolution of the two-state issue by
the end of Bush's administration. I think this is foolish and
counterproductive.

There's nobody effectively to talk to on the Palestinian side,Bolton argues.
You're not going to talk to Hamas, which is a terrorist organization, in
Gaza, or for that matter Fatah or what's left of the Palestinian Authority
in the West Bank, which can't fulfill any commitments it makes anyway. So I
just think this is chasing our tail at a time when we should be focused on
issues that may be hard to do, but which are very important, such as
preserving the democratic process in Lebanon.

Bolton points to the latest assassination of an anti-Syrian member of the
Lebanese parliament as an example of just how precarious that government's
position is. There's little doubt in my mind where the order to do that came
from, Bolton says, and it shows just how bold the Syrians and, inferentially
at least, the Iranians are. We've got murder investigations going on under
the authority of the Security Council, they want to set up an international
tribunal, and yet the anti-Syrian politicians are still getting killed.

Instead of focusing on Israeli-Palestinian issues, Bolton says, what we
should be focused on is trying to preserve the possibility of a democratic
government [in Lebanon] that might actually at some point root out Hezbollah
and achieve real peace with Israel.

Of Rice's second priority at the U.N. Iran's nuclear program  Bolton says,
Condi has finally said a couple of tough things about Mohammed Elbaradei of
the International Atomic Energy Agency  long overdue, in my view. And she
said the sanctions have to have teeth.

Now that was a good idea about four years ago, Bolton says, but today we're
long past the point where anything the Security Council is able to do will
have any measurable impact on Iran's decision-making, its commitment to get
nuclear weapons or its technical operational progress in achieving that
objective.

Bolton says that Israel's raid into Syria has put the focus this week on
both the Arab-Israeli issue and Iran's nuclear activities, particularly the
role, if any, played by North Korea. In addition to reports
<http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2512380.ece>
that a shipment of nuclear materials from North Korea was the target of the
raid, Bolton says it is logical to think North Korea might be outsourcing
part of its nuclear program to Syria.

Given that we don't know exactly what is happening with the North Koreans
and Syria on the nuclear front, we know, and it's been public for some time,
that on the ballistic-missile front, there's extensive cooperation between
North Korea, Iran and Syria, Bolton says. If you're North Korea looking to
avoid detection and verification of this commitment to give up nuclear
weapons, which I don't think the North Koreans will ever do, it's perfectly
logical to say, well, we outsourced a lot of our ballistic-missile work, why
don't we outsource some of our nuclear program as well.

Syria would not do that with North Korea without, at a minimum, Iranian
acquiescence, Bolton adds. In some respects, Iran has a problem similar to
North Korea's, namely to continue its program without detection. It may well
be they've got facilities [in Syria] too.

Bolton says that increasing evidence of connections between Syria, Iran and
North Korea  and the threat such cooperation poses to Israel, the region and
a whole range of U.S. interests  should be heightening our concern, not to
try to deal with the Syrians or the Iranians as the Baker-Hamilton
Commission recommended, but to take steps to remove the problem by changing
the regimes.

He adds that the Israeli raid was a signal not just to Syria but to the
Iranians as well, and that more than anything else was an encouraging
development.

This will be the first meeting of the General Assembly presided over by its
new secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon. Bolton says Ban started out with some
very positive things  making his personal financial disclosure papers
public, which Kofi Annan refused to do, but that in recent months, Ban has
shown signs of being absorbed by the U.N. culture.

Bolton says Ban failed a key test two months ago when he personally
intervened on behalf of China on the question of whether Taiwan should be
allowed to apply for U.N. membership.

Membership in the U.N. is a decision for the member governments, Bolton
says. The secretary-general has no role whatever. So he should have said,
well, they've applied, it's up to the membership. But this is a case where
China really wanted this, they wanted him to say it, and he did.

Bolton says that's a troubling sign, because basically China and the United
States put him in office. The Europeans  Britain, France, Russia  had very
little to do with this call. And when the U.S. and China are aligned, Ban
Ki-moon will follow that lead. The test for Ban Ki-moon is, what happens
when China and the U.S. disagree.

Bolton says, here was a case  not that the administration is very helpful to
Taiwan, but it has never been the U.S. position that [the U.N. resolution
replacing Taiwan's representatives with  China's] declared Taiwan a part of
China  where we had a disagreement with China, and he went China's way.

Finally, Bolton addressed the intense controversy surrounding the proposed
activities of Iranian president Ahmadinejad on American soil.[The
controversy] heightens the interest we'll see in Ahmadinejad's speech,
Bolton says. Last year, he said he thought he saw the light of heaven
descending on him in the podium.

That's one upside to the forum,  a dictator who's free to lecture us in our
own country is just as free to make himself look foolish in front of the
world. 

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to