Study: Nuclear theft threat high 
Harvard group finds progress, but still a gap in protecting nuclear
materials
The Associated Press
Updated: 8:37 p.m. PT Sept 26, 2007

WASHINGTON - While there has been progress in protecting nuclear materials
in Russia, the threat of terrorists' stealing a nuclear device remains high
in many parts of the world, a private study concluded Wednesday.

"Terrorists are actively seeking nuclear weapons and materials to make
them," said the report by Harvard University's Managing the Atom project.

The group annually assesses progress, and the lack of it, being made to
protect nuclear weapons and other nuclear material that, if stolen by
terrorists, could lead to a nuclear explosion.

Matthew Bunn, the report's author, said Wednesday that "we are making real
progress" in increasing security for nuclear material and warheads in Russia
but that there remain "gaping holes" in the protection of nuclear materials
in many areas of the world.

"The gap has narrowed, but it remains a dangerous gap that needs to be
closed," Bunn said in a conference call with reporters.

Charles Curtis, president of the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a private
advocacy group that commissioned the report, said: "This is not a question
of the glass half full or half empty." He noted that while there has been a
measure of progress it takes only a few pounds of plutonium or highly
enriched uranium to fashion a bomb.

"We are not yet treating it as the No. 1 security threat to our nation and
the world," said Curtis, who was deputy energy secretary in the Clinton
administration.

Report details nations with nuclear ingredients
The report said the essential ingredients for a nuclear weapon exist in more
than 40 countries "and there are scores of sites that are not secure enough
to defeat the capabilities that terrorists and criminals have demonstrated"
should they seek to steal such material.

Neither the U.S. government nor the International Atomic Energy Agency has
"a prioritized list assessing which facilities around the world pose the
most serious risk of nuclear theft," the report said.

It said from information that is available the highest risks of nuclear
theft are in Russia, Pakistan and more than 140 research reactors, often
minimally guarded, in various countries that still contain highly enriched
uranium suitable for making a nuclear bomb.

"Pakistan's nuclear stockpiles are comparatively small, and are believed to
be heavily guarded. But face huge threats from armed jihadi groups and
nuclear insiders with a demonstrated willingness to sell sensitive nuclear
technology," said the report.

Other nuclear theft risks include the large-scale transport of civilian
plutonium in developing countries, including China and India.

"We need an urgent campaign to lock down all of these stockpiles ...
everywhere they exist in the world," said Bunn. He noted that there is no
agreement between the U.S. and China on securing that country's
weapons-related nuclear material.

Official: There is 'a great sense of urgency'
William Tobey, in charge of nuclear nonproliferation at DOE's National
Nuclear Security Administration, said there is "a great sense of urgency"
about improving security at the former Soviet locations and reducing the
risks at research reactors.

He said the agency has accelerated the program to remove highly enriched
uranium from research reactors, plans to complete security upgrades at
Russian nuclear sites by the end of 2008, and will have radiation detection
devices at all Russian border crossings by the end of 2011, six years ahead
of schedule.

The report acknowledges progress that has been made in U.S. efforts to
increase security over nuclear weapons materials in the former Soviet Union.
It said that 70 percent of the buildings with such material have had
security improvements.

While the U.S. global threat reduction initiative has expanded efforts to
remove highly enriched uranium from 129 research reactors across the globe
only 48 have been converted to low-enriched uranium or shut down as of the
end of 2006.

"Roughly half of the research reactors operating with HEU around the world
today are still not covered by the conversion effort," the report said.


C 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21001357/

  _____  

MSN Privacy <http://mobile.msn.com/device/en-us/privacy.aspx>  . Legal
<http://mobile.msn.com/device/en-us/terms.aspx> 
C 2007 MSNBC.com 
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to