Rice doesn't even understand Russians, supposedly her specialty, much less
Muslims.
 
B
 
 

An Israeli Strike on Syria Kindles Debate in the U.S. 
By
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/m/mark_mazzetti/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> MARK MAZZETTI and
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/helene_cooper/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> HELENE COOPER
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/washington/10diplo.html?ref=world
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/10/washington/10diplo.html?ref=world&pagewan
ted=print> &pagewanted=print

 
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/national/usstatesterritoriesandpossessio
ns/washingtondc/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> WASHINGTON, Oct. 9 - A sharp
debate is under way in the Bush administration about the significance of the
Israeli intelligence that led to last month's Israeli strike inside
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/sy
ria/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> Syria, according to current and former
American government officials.

At issue is whether intelligence that
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/is
rael/index.html?inline=nyt-geo> Israel presented months ago to the White
House - to support claims that Syria had begun early work on what could
become a nuclear weapons program with help from North Korea - was conclusive
enough to justify military action by Israel and a possible rethinking of
American policy toward the two nations. 

The debate has fractured along now-familiar fault lines, with Vice President
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/c/dick_cheney/in
dex.html?inline=nyt-per> Dick Cheney and conservative hawks in the
administration portraying the Israeli intelligence as credible and arguing
that it should cause the United States to reconsider its diplomatic
overtures to Syria and North Korea. 

By contrast, Secretary of State
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/r/condoleezza_ri
ce/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Condoleezza Rice and her allies within the
administration have said they do not believe that the intelligence presented
so far merits any change in the American diplomatic approach.

"Some people think that it means that the sky is falling," a senior
administration official said. "Others say that they're not convinced that
the real intelligence poses a threat." 

Several current and former officials, as well as outside experts, spoke on
the condition of anonymity because the intelligence surrounding the Israeli
strike remains highly classified. 

Besides Ms. Rice, officials said that Defense Secretary
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/robert_m_gates
/index.html?inline=nyt-per> Robert M. Gates was cautious about fully
endorsing Israeli warnings that Syria was on a path that could lead to a
nuclear weapon. Others in the Bush administration remain unconvinced that a
nascent Syrian nuclear program could pose an immediate threat.

It has long been known that North Korean scientists have aided Damascus in
developing sophisticated ballistic missile technology, and there appears to
be little debate that North Koreans frequently visited a site in the Syrian
desert that Israeli jets attacked Sept. 6. Where officials disagree is
whether the accumulated evidence points to a Syrian nuclear program that
poses a significant threat to the Middle East. 

Mr. Cheney and his allies have expressed unease at the decision last week by
President Bush and Ms. Rice to proceed with an agreement to supply North
Korea with economic aid in return for the North's disabling its nuclear
reactor. Those officials argued that the Israeli intelligence demonstrates
that North Korea cannot be trusted. They also argue that the United States
should be prepared to scuttle the agreement unless North Korea admits to its
dealing with the Syrians. 

During a breakfast meeting on Oct. 2 at the White House, Ms. Rice and her
chief North Korea negotiator, Christopher R. Hill, made the case to
President Bush that the United States faced a choice: to continue with the
nuclear pact with North Korea as a way to bring the secretive country back
into the diplomatic fold and give it the incentive to stop proliferating
nuclear material; or to return to the administration's previous strategy of
isolation, which detractors say left North Korea to its own devices and led
it to test a nuclear device last October.

Mr. Cheney and Stephen J. Hadley, the national security adviser, also
attended the meeting, administration officials said. 

The Israeli strike occurred at a particularly delicate time for American
diplomatic efforts. In addition to the North Korean nuclear negotiations,
the White House is also trying to engineer a regional Middle East peace
conference that would work toward a comprehensive peace accord between Arabs
and Israelis. 

The current and former American officials said Israel presented the United
States with intelligence over the summer about what it described as nuclear
activity in Syria. Officials have said Israel told the White House shortly
in advance of the September raid that it was prepared to carry it out, but
it is not clear whether the White House took a position then about whether
the attack was justified.

One former top Bush administration official said Israeli officials were so
concerned about the threat posed by a potential Syrian nuclear program that
they told the White House they could not wait past the end of the summer to
strike the facility. 

Last week, Turkish officials traveled to Damascus to present the Syrian
government with the Israeli dossier on what was believed to be a Syrian
nuclear program, according to a Middle East security analyst in Washington.
The analyst said that Syrian officials vigorously denied the intelligence
and said that what the Israelis hit was a storage depot for strategic
missiles.

That denial followed a similar denial from North Korea. Mr. Hill, the State
Department's assistant secretary for East Asia and Pacific affairs, raised
the Syria issue with his North Korean counterparts in talks in Beijing in
late September. The North Koreans denied providing any nuclear material to
Syria.

Publicly, Syrian officials have said Israeli jets hit an empty warehouse. 

Bruce Riedel, a veteran of the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/central
_intelligence_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org> C.I.A. and the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/n/nationa
l_security_council/index.html?inline=nyt-org> National Security Council and
now a Middle East expert at the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/b/brookin
gs_institution/index.html?inline=nyt-org> Brookings Institution, said that
American intelligence agencies remained cautious in drawing hard conclusions
about the significance of the suspicious activity at the Syrian site. 

Still, Mr. Riedel said Israel would not have launched the strike in Syria if
it believed Damascus was merely developing more sophisticated ballistic
missiles or chemical weapons. 

"Those red lines were crossed 20 years ago," he said. "You don't risk
general war in the Middle East over an extra 100 kilometers' range on a
missile system."

Another former intelligence official said Syria was attempting to develop
so-called airburst capability for its ballistic missiles. Such technology
would allow Syria to detonate warheads in the air to disperse the warhead's
material more widely. 

Since North Korea detonated its nuclear device, Ms. Rice has prodded Mr.
Bush toward a more diplomatic approach with North Korea, through talks that
also include Japan, Russia, South Korea and China. Those talks led to the
initial agreement last February for North Korea to shut down its nuclear
reactor in exchange for fuel and
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/f/food_aid/ind
ex.html?inline=nyt-classifier> food aid.

That deal angered conservatives who believed that the Bush administration
had made diplomacy toward North Korea too high a priority, at the expense of
efforts to combat the spread of illicit weapons in the Middle East. 

"Opposing the Israeli strike to protect the six-party talks would be a
breathtaking repudiation of the administration's own national security
strategy," said
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/john_r_bolton/
index.html?inline=nyt-per> John R. Bolton, former United States ambassador
to the
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/united_
nations/index.html?inline=nyt-org> United Nations. 

But other current and former officials argue that the diplomatic approach is
America's best option for dealing with the question of North Korean
proliferation.

"You can't just make these decisions using the top of your spinal cord, you
have to use the whole brain," said Philip D. Zelikow, the former counselor
at the State Department. "What other policy are we going to pursue that we
think would be better?"


(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to