http://blog.zeit.de/joerglau/2007/10/11/ayaan-hirsi-ali-bush-ist-zu-soft-mit
-dem-islam_827
 
Donnerstag 11.10.2007 

*       Die Freunde und die Feinde des Islams
<http://blog.zeit.de/joerglau/category/die-freunde-und-die-feinde-des-islams
> 

 
<http://blog.zeit.de/joerglau/2007/10/11/ayaan-hirsi-ali-bush-ist-zu-soft-mi
t-dem-islam_827> Ayaan Hirsi Ali: Bush ist zu soft mit dem Islam
Von Jörg Lau | 2:16 
Während ich Ayaan Hirsi Alis Recht auf Schutz durch den niederländischen
Staat - oder meinetwegen durch die EU - verteidige, finde ich ihre
Kriegsrhetorik zunehmend bedenklich. Hier das jüngste Beispiel aus einem
langen interview mit der libertären Zeitschrift “Reason”
<http://www.reason.com/news/show/122457.html> :

Reason: Should we acknowledge that organized religion has sometimes sparked
precisely the kinds of emancipation movements that could lift Islam into
modern times? Slavery in the United States ended in part because of
opposition by prominent church members and the communities they galvanized.
The Polish Catholic Church helped defeat the Jaruzelski puppet regime. Do
you think Islam could bring about similar social and political changes?

Hirsi Ali: Only if Islam is defeated. Because right now, the political side
of Islam, the power-hungry expansionist side of Islam, has become superior
to the Sufis and the Ismailis and the peace-seeking Muslims.

Reason: Don’t you mean defeating radical Islam?

Hirsi Ali: No. Islam, period. Once it’s defeated, it can mutate into
something peaceful. It’s very difficult to even talk about peace now.
They’re not interested in peace.

Reason: We have to crush the world’s 1.5 billion Muslims under our boot? In
concrete terms, what does that mean, “defeat Islam”?

Hirsi Ali: I think that we are at war with Islam. And there’s no middle
ground in wars. Islam can be defeated in many ways. For starters, you stop
the spread of the ideology itself; at present, there are native Westerners
converting to Islam, and they’re the most fanatical sometimes. There is
infiltration of Islam in the schools and universities of the West. You stop
that. You stop the symbol burning and the effigy burning, and you look them
in the eye and flex your muscles and you say, “This is a warning. We won’t
accept this anymore.” There comes a moment when you crush your enemy.

Reason: Militarily?

Hirsi Ali: In all forms, and if you don’t do that, then you have to live
with the consequence of being crushed.

Reason: Are we really heading toward anything so ominous?

Hirsi Ali: I think that’s where we’re heading. We’re heading there because
the West has been in denial for a long time. It did not respond to the
signals that were smaller and easier to take care of. Now we have some
choices to make. This is a dilemma: Western civilization is a celebration of
life—everybody’s life, even your enemy’s life. So how can you be true to
that morality and at the same time defend yourself against a very powerful
enemy that seeks to destroy you?

Reason: George Bush, not the most conciliatory person in the world, has said
on plenty of occasions that we are not at war with Islam.

Hirsi Ali: If the most powerful man in the West talks like that, then,
without intending to, he’s making radical Muslims think they’ve already won.
There is no moderate Islam. There are Muslims who are passive, who don’t all
follow the rules of Islam, but there’s really only one Islam, defined as
submission to the will of God. There’s nothing moderate about it.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to