http://www.samizdata.net/blog/ <http://www.samizdata.net/blog/> 

November 10, 2007

Yet another complete non meeting of minds

Perry de Havilland (London) Middle East & Islamic

Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari, head of the Muslim Council of Britain, has
given an interview

[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/10/nbari110.xm
l
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/10/nbari110.xm
l> ]

to the Telegraph which neatly puts on display the vast cultural gulf
and complete lack of understanding on the Muslim side when they
discuss how Muslim and Western cultures can learn from each other. Dr.
Bari says...

"Terrorists are terrorists, they may use religion but we shouldn't
say Muslim terrorists, it stigmatises the whole community. We never
called the IRA Catholic terrorists."

The various global franchisees of Al Qaeda do the things they do
precisely because of their interpretation of the values and
imperatives of Islam. They are motivated 99% by religion and therefore
they can only be correctly described as Muslim or Islamic terrorists.
Describing them as 'Asian' as the BBC often does (as in "two Asian men
were arrested today and held under the Prevention of Terrorism
Act...") is a grotesque bit of racism, because their race and
ethnicity is utterly irrelevant to why they were arrested. They were
arrested because they are suspected Muslim terrorists, not Asian
terrorists.

The IRA on the other hand was a secular Marxist Irish nationalist
paramilitary organisation that just happened to be drawn from the
Catholic community. What they were not doing was trying impose
Catholicism on anyone. They were trying to end British sovereignty in
Ulster and make Ulster part of the Irish Republic, hence they were
called 'Republican' terrorists...Being a Catholic but supporting the
Union still made you an enemy of the IRA, as many people found to
their cost. This is also why opposing paramilitary outfits like the
UDA were usually called 'Loyalists' paramilitaries rather than
'Protestant'. If anyone seriously thinks the Troubles in Ireland were
a religious conflict, they have clearly not been paying attention.
That Dr. Bari did not bother to figure this out suggests to me that
like so many of his ilk, he cannot see the world through anything
other than the distorting lens of religion.

Sir Salman Rushdie should never have been knighted, he says. "He
caused a huge amount of distress and discordance with his book, it
should have been pulped."

The 'Satanic Verses' should have been pulped by whom? I assume Dr.
Bari means the State, in order to prevent 'distress and discordance'.
So if a large number of non-Muslim British people find the Koran
causes them "distress and discordance", as well it might, is Dr. Bari
really wise to want the State to take upon itself the role of pulping
books in order to sooth people's distress and prevent discord?

According to a recent report by the Policy Exchange think-tank,
the bookshop at the east London Mosque, which Dr Bari chairs, stocks
extremist literature.

"The bookshops are independent businesses," he says. "We can't
just go in and tell them what to sell ... I will see what books they
keep, if they have one book which looks like it is inciting hatred, do
they have counter books on the same shelf?"

So he wants Rushdie's book pulped but is quite sanguine about Islamic
books calling for violence and hatred just so long as contrary Islamic
views are also available. All animals are equal but some are more
equal than others, eh Dr. Bari?

He says we should look favourably upon arranged marriages and learn
from Islam by become less overtly sexual and more modest. Why exactly?
I met many Bosnian 'Muslims' who had learned quite the opposite lesson
and saw no reason not to wear miniskirts and enjoy their sexuality
rather than becoming psycho-sexual cripples.

But when I read this bit, it became clear to me that Dr. Bari was not
merely well meaning but wrong:

Is stoning ever justified? "It depends what sort of stoning and
what circumstances," he replies. "When our prophet talked about
stoning for adultery he said there should be four [witnesses] - in
realistic terms that's impossible. It's a metaphor for disapproval."

I see...
woman_stoned_to_death.jpg

[Caption:]"Don't worry, dear, what we are about to do to you is
just a metaphor"

[You've seen the picture--or go to the source URL, above.--J]

It is pictures like that which fill my mind with homicidal rage. The
Muslims partially burying this Muslim woman, in preparation for her
being stoned to death in accordance with the Koran, all deserve
nothing less than a bullet in their brains, to be put down like rabid
dogs. And when I hear people like Dr. Bari describing this practice as
a "metaphor for disapproval" rather than a method of theocratic
execution, my feelings towards him move from mere disagreement into
transcendent loathing. Take a moment and really look at that fucking
picture. According to Dr. Bari, if there were four witnesses, that is
perfectly okay then. Try getting your head around that. 

And so when a man who cannot bring himself to unequivocally condemn
such barbarity tells us that we have anything whatsoever to learn from
what he sees as Islam, it would be fair to say "I do not think so". As
I discovered in Bosnia in the 1990's, being a Muslim and accepting the
norms of western post-Enlightenment civilisation is entirely
possible... 'Muslim' becomes more of an ethic identity rather than a
religious one, in which you just have to ignore large chunks of the
Koran or 'interpret' them into something harmless (and face it, there
are parts of the Old Testament most Christians prefer to gloss over
too). The key is that the Bosnian Muslims became more and more secular
(i.e. less religious), more western, the west did not become more like
them.

That said I am sure you can be a practising Muslim and still embrace
western modernity. I would be astounded if Tory MEP Syed Kamall 

[http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=people.person.page&personID=123004
<http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=people.person.page&personID=123004
> ],

who is well and truly on the libertarian wing of his party, would have
any problem whatsoever condemning stoning as a barbarous throwback
regardless of how many witnesses there were to a woman's infidelity.
People like Syed have simply grafted many of the best bits of the
European enlightenment onto their religion and as a result made
themselves wholly compatible with any pluralistic tolerant society. Is
it still Islam? Well I am sure Syed would say it is.

But sadly the Pakistani and Saudi flavour of Islam that Dr. Bari is
part of have done nothing of the sort and show no signs they actually
want to embrace modernity at all. Their notions of Islam, which is
clearly the most evangelical version of the religion, is a toxic
political and philosophical creed that is simply incompatible with
liberal modernity and Dr. Bari's equivocation about stoning people to
death tells you everything you need to know about where he is coming
from intellectually.




--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to