http://www.latimes.com:80/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-screening11nov11,0,37
8608.story?coll=la-home-center
 

Japan's welcome mat getting prickly

New rules requiring fingerprints and digital photos of visitors are
revealing about attitudes toward foreigners, critics say.
By Bruce Wallace
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

November 11, 2007

TOKYO - The kind of greeting a foreigner receives at immigration upon
arrival at an international airport can be a good, if imperfect, indication
of the country that waits on the other side of the barrier.

London's Heathrow? Long queues and lousy service.

New Delhi's Indira Gandhi International? Crumbling infrastructure and
over-the-top bureaucracy.

Some Middle Eastern airports? Slow-moving lines that can be circumvented
with the right connections and cash.

Now the Japanese government has created new immigration procedures for
foreign visitors -- rules that critics say are all too revealing about
official attitudes toward foreigners.

On Nov. 20, Japan will begin fingerprinting and photographing non-Japanese
travelers as they pass through immigration at air and sea ports. The
government says the controls are a necessary security measure aimed at
preventing a terrorist attack in Japan.

The new system is modeled on the U.S. program instituted in 2004 that takes
digital photos and fingerprints of travelers entering the United States on
visas. But the Japanese system goes further by requiring foreign residents
-- in addition to visitors -- to be photographed and fingerprinted.

There are exceptions: diplomats, children younger than 16, U.S. military
personnel serving in Japan, and long-term residents of Korean or Chinese
descent whose presence here is largely owed to Imperial Japan's overseas
conquests. But all other foreigners will be scanned each time upon entry.

Critics say the data collection is a dubious terrorism-fighting measure,
instead reflecting the government's desire for closer surveillance of
foreigners.

"The Japanese government has a long history of not wanting long-term foreign
residents, and they really feel they need more control over foreigners,"
said Sonoko Kawakami of the Japanese chapter of Amnesty International. "The
government just wants to gather as much information as possible on people."

The only terrorist spectaculars in Japanese history have come from homegrown
groups: the Japanese Red Army, which conducted attacks around the world in
the 1970s and '80s, and the Aum Shinrikyo cult, which carried out a sarin
gas attack on the Tokyo subway in 1995.

But officials say Tokyo's support for the U.S.-led wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan makes Japan a target, and taking biometric data such as
fingerprints and digital facial photos is the only way to nab terrorists
traveling on fake passports.

At least that was the recent contention of Japan's justice minister. He even
offered a bizarre personal anecdote to explain how easy it was for
non-Japanese to sneak into the country. "A friend of my friend is a member
of Al Qaeda," Kunio Hatoyama told foreign reporters in Tokyo, saying that
the man had entered Japan numerous times using fake passports and disguises.

Hatoyama later backtracked slightly on his story, distancing himself from
any connection to Al Qaeda and raising suspicions that he had embellished
his anecdote to press the case for fingerprinting foreigners.

But Hatoyama has long been among the senior public officials who believe
Japan is already too open to overseas workers. When he became justice
minister in August, Hatoyama made it clear he had no intention of proceeding
with earlier plans to allow in more unskilled workers.

That, he warned, could lead to an increase in crime.

Statistics, however, show that the number of crimes committed by foreign
visitors is falling. And despite alarm about particularly sensational crimes
that attract media attention, Japan's overall crime rate is declining or
flat.

That hasn't stopped some senior Japanese politicians from stoking
anti-immigrant fires by contending that foreigners living in Japan commit a
higher proportion of crimes. And those contentions have sent bureaucrats in
search of ways to weed out the "good" foreigners, presumably those with
money to invest, from "bad" ones, such as the Chinese pickpocket gangs that
get so much media attention here.

The new immigration system appears to be one answer. Fingerprinting is
actually a resumption of a system that was abandoned in 2000 after strong
protests by long-term Korean, Chinese and Taiwanese residents who resented
being fingerprinted in their own country. A jittery, post-9/11 America
provided the initiative for the Japanese to revive it.

The law instituting the new regime passed parliament last year with very
little outcry. The Federation of Japanese Bar Assns. was a lonely critical
voice, complaining that fingerprinting people who had already been granted
residency was an infringement on civil liberties. But the government avoided
a repeat showdown with the Koreans and Chinese by exempting them from the
new requirements.

"The Japanese public does not see this as 'our' problem," said Masashi
Ichikawa, a human rights lawyer in Tokyo. "The climate is that it is
legitimate to be 'against terrorism,' and that people just have to follow
the rules."

The fingerprinting issue underscores the Japanese dilemma in dealing with
foreigners.

On the one hand, in this age of increased global mobility, the threat of
terrorism, though remote, is a plausible one.

But on the other, the Japanese government needs more foreigners. Japan has
low unemployment by global standards and faces a demographic crunch as its
population ages and workforce shrinks. Tokyo is fighting to preserve its
position as a world financial center as competitors such as Singapore
actively cultivate a welcoming aura for foreign businesses.

And Japan is still searching for ways to address its tourist deficit at a
time when well-heeled travelers have a widening array of Asian destination
choices.

It remains to be seen whether treating every visitor as a potential
terrorist, until their fingerprints prove otherwise, is the best way to roll
out the welcome mat.


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to