The Truth Behind Al Qaeda's Holiday Terrorism Threat 


Friday , November 09, 2007


By Catherine Herridge


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,310278,00.html


  <http://www.foxnews.com/foxfan/images/catherine130.jpg>
<file:///C:/images/clear_dot.gif>       
FNC     
In this week's Intelligence Briefing: MI5, malls and making it work at the
Pentagon.

The week began with stunning news out of England. It was my day off and I
was taking some time to read the paper and one story immediately caught my
attention. The head of MI5, her majesty's intelligence service, a man who
rarely speaks publicly, said 2000 extremists are living in Great Britain and
there are maybe twice as many they don't even know about - stunning
information.

The trend the British are seeing is important and has implications for this
country because British citizens typically do not need special visas to
travel to the U.S. British intelligence has identified this pattern:
extremists travel to Pakistan, generally the tribal areas where Al Qaeda
leadership has gained a foothold, or Afghanistan to train, and then they
return to their own country to launch attacks.

The top counterterrorism official in this country recently told me of two
big terror busts in Europe: one in Germany targeting the U.S. airbase at
Ramstein, and another plot in Denmark - both tied to the tribal areas of
Pakistan. This is an area where Al Qaeda has regained a foothold, allowing
them to plan operation, recruit jihadists who don't fit the typical profile,
and, most importantly, teach people how to make IEDs. It's not so hard to
learn in Iraq, where explosives are everywhere, but back in their own
country, these recruits will need to buy the materials and put the device
together with a detonator, from scratch.

Stop and think about it. Europeans going to Pakistan to train. As one
counterterrorism official put it, "They are trying to move west." So far,
they have been successful in London and Madrid - but, what they'd really
like to do is hit the U.S. In fact, according to the national intelligence
estimate, the intelligence community's best projection over the next year,
states that Al Qaeda will likely intensity its effort to get operatives into
the U.S.

By late in the week, another law enforcement bulletin is leaked to the
media. This is a pretty common occurrence. It's not classified information
or anything, just often the result of persistent reporting. The intelligence
was picked up in late September that Al Qaeda wants to hit malls in Chicago
and Los Angeles. It came from a reliable source. That means they've
delivered the goods for us in the past. But, the problem lies in the fact
that the source does not have first-hand knowledge of the threat, it came to
them, through a second or even a third-hand source so there is no way to
corroborate it.

So, a lot of people ask me why bother putting it out there in the first
place. Well, that is how law enforcement and Homeland Security works these
days. They get something, in this case it was specific to malls in Chicago
and Los Angeles, so they put it out there so local cops and local security
can decide whether to ramp things up.

For some context, about this time every year, before Thanksgiving leading up
to Christmas, there is usually some sort of threat information targeting the
U.S. Some years it is malls, others, if my memory is correct, it's at
airports or mass transit. This is part of Al Qaeda's plan - to disrupt the
economy. In their mind, this may be enough to scare people away from a
little shopping, even if nothing is in the pipeline.

It is hard to say how credible this intelligence is. You can't dismiss it
out of hand. One of my contacts is noticing a lot more chatter on the
jihadist forums about striking small blows. That may be code for smaller
attacks which could be equally effective at hurting the economy and our
resolve than the "big spectaculars" like 9/11. In some of the recent tapes,
Al Qaeda has spoken of this as well. I am paraphrasing here, but why dream
of a nuclear strike on the U.S. if you can never get a hold of a bomb that
works?

It seems like a lot of confusing contradictory information, so always try to
remember the context. This is what a good Intel analyst always tells him or
herself.

And today, Friday, for a change of pace, I am over at the Pentagon filling
in. Jennifer Griffin has been logging some travel overseas with Secretary
Gates, so I am here to pick up the slack. It is fun to work here. My husband
is in the military, so I sometimes run into familiar faces and the producer
Justin Fishel couldn't be more pleasant.

The Pentagon is an easy place to get lost in - the first time you come, you
want to bring a ball of string so you can find your way back out again. I
have it down pretty well now. It is a lot of fun to swap hats for a day or
so!

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to