Hezbollah is Iran's Army in Lebanon, not a Militia or Resistance. 
By: Elias Bejjani 

November 13/07

http://middle-east-analysis.blogspot.com/2007/11/hezbollah-is-irans-army-in-
lebanon-not.html
 
Hezbollah's General Secretary Sayed Hassan Nasrallah delivered a fiery and
tantamount speech on Sunday November 11/07 in which he vows to maintain his
party's Military Might, challenged the whole free world, the UN resolutions,
the majority of the Lebanese people, and evilly refused to disarm. His
speech was seen by many observers as an open and bold declaration of war,
and a mean Iranian-Syrian instigation for a coup in Lebanon. He said
verbatim: "No one in the world can disarm Hezbollah, The resistance in
Lebanon has determination, will, manpower and sufficient weapons to face
Israel in a new conflict, No to the implementation of the UN Resolution
1559.(  <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/text_of_resolution_1559.htm>
Security Council Resolution 1559) Hezbollah's recent maneuvers convey a
message that the resistance is ready to make a historic victory that would
change the face of the region. Any Lebanese president elected by a simple
majority will not be recognized by the opposition, which would consider him
to be an impostor," 
 
Clear, public, strong and deterrent stances in regards to Nasrallah's recent
threats are urgently required from all Lebanese parties, communities and
institutions, the United Nations and its Security Council, Europe, Free
world countries, and the Arab League, because Hezbollah, this Iranian
"Wilayat Al Fakih, Republican Guards" party, is apparently determined to
topple the Lebanese democratic regime and erect in its place a replicate of
the oppressive and religious Iranian Republic. 
 
It is no longer acceptable, by any measure of law and self-respect, for any
Lebanese from any social, religious, or ethnic background to surrender or
remain passive towards these national and moral debaucheries. We, the
Lebanese both in Lebanon and the Diaspora, must rebel against this hostage
conditioning imposed upon us by terrorist and fundamentalist groups. 
 
It is no longer acceptable that the Lebanese tolerate any further
coexistence with conditions of fear, obedience, self-delusion, falsification
of facts, and false witnessing. 
 
It is no longer acceptable that the Lebanese play the role of the falling
prey hiding behind outdated and obsequious political stances. 
 
We should not remain silent watching the madness of pervert politicians
whose only goal is to serve their own self-interest, bank accounts, and lust
for power
that inhabits their sick minds, all at the expense of the nation, its
survival, and the Lebanese people's livelihood and dignity. 
 
The highest of these sacrileges is the Hezbollah condition, its confused
terminology, its fabricated accomplishments, its destructive role, its
Irano-Syrian expansionist conspiracies, and its aggressions of all forms.
This party, invented by Iran and nurtured by Syria since 1982 has been
tasked with murder, assassinations, terror, the subjugation of the Lebanese
Shiites, and the sabotage of the Lebanese regime and its dismantlement. This
is neither a party, nor a resistance; rather, it is a formal de facto
Iranian Army stationed in Lebanon, directly backed in weapons and funds by
the Iranian regime. Hezbollah's ties to the Iranian regime transcend
Lebanon's 
boundaries, and the group returns the favor to Tehran by training Shiite
insurgents in Iraq to attack US interests there and worldwide. 
 
No one among the Lebanese ignores that the financier, the ideologue, and the
decision maker behind Hezbollah's marching orders is simply the Iranian
regime. All Hezbollah's local leaders are appointed and demoted by Iran.
Their absolute loyalty is to Iran and to the religious edicts originating
from its Mullahs. These Iranian agents have not one grain of loyalty
whatsoever to Lebanon, its institutions, its constitution, and its society. 
 
Hezbollah's ethics and the doctrine of its masters in Damascus and Teheran
consider Lebanon their war playground, no more no less. And the declared
duty of
this "Jihadist"-"Godly" party is to transform Lebanon by all means into a
satellite state to Iran's "Wilayat Al Fakih" state, a replicate of its
fundamentalist mullah regime imposed through terror on the Iranian people. 
 
The Syrian occupier (1976-2005) nurtured the Iranian Hezbollah during its 30
years of occupation of Lebanon. It provided it with all necessary logistical
support to dominate its zones of influence within Lebanon in all aspects:
militarily, culturally, and religiously. The Assad regime allowed Hezbollah
to erect its own closed security quarters in Beirut, the South, and the
Bekaa. As to the Iranian mullah regime, it committed to the financing,
armament, and training of Hezbollah as well as the control of its
administration, direction, and decision making. 
 
There has never been a consensus on Hezbollah's "resistance" role, because
it was never a resistance against Israel as it has marketed itself. Neither
was Israel's withdrawal back in 2000 due to Hezbollah's "resistance". It was
rather based on a public decision adopted by the Israeli state since 1985
due to local Israeli domestic considerations and to constant pressures from
the Clinton Administration. Indeed, Hezbollah's actions played in favor of
the Israeli occupation of the south lasting as long as it did, by delaying
for 15 years an otherwise inevitable withdrawal. The reason: The presence of
the Israeli army in Lebanon was convenient to the Syrian and Iranian
regimes. This is why, following that withdrawal in 2000, Hezbollah - again
instructed by Damascus and Tehran - concocted the Shebaa Farms 
charade to justify its continued "resistance" and its raison d'etre to
continue raping Lebanese sovereignty and inflicting harm to Lebanon as a
nation and as a people.
 
The so-called "consensus" on Hezbollah's "resistance" during the Syrian
occupation was a coerced position obtained through force and terror, and had
nothing to 
do with the deliberate will and thinking of the Lebanese people. The "Shebaa
Farms" themselves were occupied and annexed by Syria from Lebanon in the
1950s - after the murder of 3 Lebanese gendarmes posted there - until they
were captured by Israel in 1967 during the six-day war. Shebaa falls under
UN resolutions 242 (
<http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/unresolution242.htm> Security Council
Resolution 242) and 338, ( <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/un338.htm>
Security Council Resolution 338) and are considered by the international
community as Syrian land. Hezbollah, Syria and Iran have marketed this lie
to justify their continued occupation of Lebanon and to continue fomenting
tensions along the Lebanese-Israeli borders. 
 
It must be noted that the 1989 Taef Accord  (
<http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/taefagreement.htm> Taef Accord) never
mentioned any role of a "resistance". It banned all armed organizations and
weapons outside the legitimacy of the Lebanese State, and explicitly called
for all militia weapons to be surrendered to the State as well as for the
disbanding of all militias within 6 months of the implementation date of the
Accord . It also upheld
<http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/arm02.htm> The 1949
Lebanese-Israeli Armistice Agreement 
 
It is to be noted as well that the 2004 UN Resolution 1559 is an
international embodiment of the "Taef Accord". It repeats clearly and
without any ambiguity all of the provisions of Taef as to the disbanding of
militias, the collection of illegal Palestinian and Lebanese weapons, and
the support for the establishment of the Lebanese State's authority over all
its territory using its own armed forces. 
 
So to all the Lebanese sovereignist politicians and all honest Lebanese we
say: Enough self-delusion, end the humiliation and the submission, announce
loud and
clear, candidly and without fear, to all the media, that Hezbollah was never
a "resistance", and that under all international and legal norms, Hezbollah
is a formal Iranian Army stationed in Lebanon. Therefore, all allegations as
to its so-called "resistance" role and its "sacred" weapons, are simply a
crime against the truth and a brazen aggression against the people of
Lebanon, against our existence, history, and dignity. As to those who
suggest the merger of Hezbollah with the Lebanese army, they need to
understand that such move would allow Hezbollah to dominate the army of the
Cedars Nation and to consequently transform the Lebanese state into a total
Hezbollah state. So be vigilant against this mortal ploy. 
 
Any Lebanese presidential candidate who avoids dealing with these truths
with courage and candor will be a toy in the hands of Hezbollah, a hostage
in the hands
of its masters in Damascus and Teheran, and an obedient tool in the hands of
Hassan Nasrallah who would complete his domination of the Lebanese State. 
 
In summary, the entire Lebanese problem today can be defined in two visions.
The first is one of a free, sovereign, and independent Lebanese State with
its thriving civil society, coexistence model, freedoms, democracy, and
peace under international law and UN resolutions. The second is one of an
Iranian-Syrian Hezbollah mini-state which, through threats and force, is
expanding like an octopus to swallow the whole of Lebanon, impose its
ideology and stone-age fundamentalism and totalitarianism, will annihilate
everything Lebanese in identity and history. It will kill all that Lebanon
has stood for centuries by making it a hostage to antiquated Islamic and
Arab Nationalist ideologies. 
 
The choice between these two visions is one to be made by the Lebanese who
in their vast majority opted for the Lebanese State when 1.5 million of them
demonstrated on March 14, 2005 during the peaceful and civilized "Cedars
Revolution". However, the Lebanese cannot on their own deter Hezbollah's
evil 
state-within-the-state which is an advanced base for the Axis of Evil
(Syria-Iran). Lebanon therefore needs urgent military assistance from the
international
community in case of a final assault by Hezbollah, Syria and Iran in their
attempt to sabotage the Lebanese presidential elections on November 21. 
 
All free nations, Arab, European, and American, must realize that Lebanon
must not fall under the domination of the two Axis of Evil states through
their Hezbollah army in Lebanon. This is a very dangerous matter that will
threaten stability and the future of sustainable peace, not only in the
Middle East, but around the world. It happened before in Lebanon: In 1975,
then in 1983. Both times, Lebanon was abandoned and the Free World fled
before the march of barbarity, only to see its instruments - bombs, planes,
and suicide bombers - follow it into every one of its cities. It should not
happen again. Let those who have ears listen. 
 
Related Links:
 <http://www.10452lccc.com/elias.english06/shaba17.8.06e.htm> Special report
on the Shebaa Farms exposing the lies and fallacies of the so-called
resistance and liberation. 
 <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/unresolution242.htm> Security Council
Resolution 242
 <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/un338.htm> Security Council
Resolution 338 
Security  <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/text_of_resolution_1559.htm>
Council Resolution 1559
 <http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/mideast/arm02.htm> The 1949
Lebanese-Israeli Armistice Agreement 
 <http://www.clhrf.com/unresagreements/taefagreement.htm> Taef Accord
  

**Elias Bejjani
Chairman for the Canadian Lebanese Coordinating Council (LCCC) 
Human Rights activist, journalist & political commentator.
Spokesman for the Canadian Lebanese Human Rights Federation (CLHRF) 
E.Mail  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LCCC Web Site  <http://www.10452lccc.com/> http://www.10452lccc.com
CLHRF Website  <http://www.clhrf.com/> http://www.clhrf.com

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to