Understanding Al-Qaeda's Pakistan PSYOP and Insurgency


The Troubling Effectiveness of al-Qaeda's PSYOP On The Pakistani Army


By Steve Schippert | September 25, 2007

http://threatswatch.org/analysis/2007/09/understanding-alqaedas-psy/

Going forward in the global conflict before us, it is important to
acknowledge and understand that al-Qaeda is currently engaged in an
Information Operation (IO) campaign inside Pakistan. This is in addition to
its efforts to gain influence outside of Pakistan, particularly with Muslims
in Europe, the Middle East and in the US. The primary target of the Pakistan
campaign is the Pakistani military and it is driven by al-Qaeda's
accelerating insurgency inside Pakistan. Understanding how and why al-Qaeda
has undertaken this effort allows decision makers greater understanding of
al-Qaeda's aims and equips them with a 'lay of the land' required to counter
al-Qaeda's message and objectives.

Usama bin Laden's latest recorded message is the third in just two weeks
following three years of virtual silence from the al-Qaeda leader. In it,
bin Laden calls on Pakistani Muslims to acknowledge that Musharraf's actions
are examples of his loyalty to the United States and representative of his
unbelief. For bin Laden and his compatriots, such unbelief marks Musharraf
as 'kufr' and places the requirement on believers to make "armed rebellion
against him." The misguided understanding that bin Laden and al-Qaeda have
of Islam makes it obligatory to fight against those who rule outside of
their interpretation of Islam, and its overly broad application of tawhid.
Yet bin Laden crafts a different message for the Pakistani Army, whom he
advises to "resign" from their jobs, "disassociate yourself from Pervez and
his Shirk (polytheism)" and "enter anew into Islam." There is a reason for
this, which will be discussed below.

Ayman al-Zawahiri's latest video message and bin Laden's audio message,
released on the same day, mark as-Sahab's 77th and 78th propaganda
productions this year alone. There is a clear shifting of gears in the
al-Qaeda Information Operations, most notably within Pakistan as well as
their international efforts surrounding the 6th anniversary of the September
11th attacks.

Before looking further into the al-Qaeda Pakistani IO campaign, we must
address the al-Qaeda-Taliban insurgency actively ongoing in Pakistan. 

al-Qaeda in Pakistan - From Terrorism to Insurgency

There is, of course, no single agreed upon definition of terrorism.
Terrorism is defined in the US Code of Federal Regulations as ".the unlawful
use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or
coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in
furtherance of political or social objectives." (28 C.F.R. Section 0.85) For
instance, terrorism is - among other things - a tactic employed to increase
support for a group through inspiration while also decreasing effective
resistance to the group through intimidation. An example of this type of
terrorism would be the beheading of those deemed to be 'spies' for the
Americans in South Waziristan, the multiple car bomb and rocket attacks, or
the anti-aircraft assassination attempts on Musharraf. Additionally, the
bombings that took place after the Pakistani government raid on Lal Masjid
(the Red Mosque) are an example of the use of terror to gain influence. No
matter the definition of terrorism being applied, al-Qaeda has clearly been
a terrorist organization in Pakistan. 

Beyond Pakistan, Al-Qaeda seeks to - in part - influence American foreign
policy through terrorist means. But within Pakistan, al-Qaeda has clearly
and by specific design transformed from being simply a dangerous
international terrorist group within Pakistan to a full-fledged internal
insurgency against it. This transformation is represented through the
efforts of al-Qaeda to acquire the armored assets of a state Army and its
nuclear weapons, as well as the pursuit of land holdings to be integrated
into the larger objective of creating an Islamic state to be ruled by a
successor to the Prophet, a Khalifa or Caliph, nearly 1350 years after the
last of the 'rightly guided' rulers.

An insurgency is a movement with specific governmental designs on the host
country. In
<http://usacac.leavenworth.army.mil/CAC/milreview/English/JulAug06/Hammes.pd
f> Countering Evolved Insurgent Networks, Col.
<http://www.amazon.com/Sling-Stone-War-21st-Century/dp/0760320594> Thomas X.
Hammes (USMC, Ret.) quotes Bard O'Neill to define an insurgency. O'Neill
wrote, "Insurgency may be defined as a struggle between a nonruling group
and the ruling authorities in which the nonruling group consciously uses
political resources (e.g., organizational expertise, propaganda, and
demonstrations) and violence to destroy, reformulate, or sustain the basis
of one or more aspects of politics."

In more accessible terms,  <http://www.terrorism-research.com/insurgency/>
Terrorism-Research.com offers that the ultimate goal of an insurgency "is to
challenge the existing government for control of all or a portion of its
territory, or force political concessions in sharing political power."

Both aptly describe al-Qaeda's actions, operations and aims within Pakistan,
a ready-made nuclear power which the terrorist group seeks to wrest complete
control. 

Perhaps the best way to describe al-Qaeda's Pakistan insurgency is to call
it a "Death by a Thousand Cuts." They have openly sought not only the
assassination of Pervez Musharraf, but also the demise - or reconfiguration
- of the Pakistani national government. In a strategy that has been executed
with remarkable patience, al-Qaeda has gained acknowledged control of
several sizable territories in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal
Areas. 

After defeating Pakistani forces on the battlefield, the Taliban-al-Qaeda
alliance have secured various 'peace accords' replete with concessions from
the Musharraf government. Effective control of North Waziristan, South
Waziristan, Bajour and Swat have been ceded to them and Pakistani forces
were - upon agreement - effectively withdrawn from the areas handed the
Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance through the accords. The accords, no matter how
presented by the Musharraf government, represented abject defeat.

Al-Qaeda Insurgency: Destination - Islamabad

Domination in these territories has allowed al-Qaeda the haven necessary to
rebuild its training and planning infrastructure as well as replenish its
human resources. After a few short weeks of basic military training, Taliban
conscripts are sent in waves across the border to battle US and Coalition
forces in Afghanistan. 

However, al-Qaeda has no designs on investing in regaining that territory.
There are no resources for them there - and a more formidable, if reduced,
military force to be reckoned with. One whose defeat of the terrorist group
drove them into Pakistan's border regions to begin with. Al-Qaeda's designs
are not back towards the west, but rather onward deeper into the heart of
Pakistan.

While al-Qaeda's Pakistan insurgency has been largely waged in the FATA
region, it's territorial aims are by no means limited to it. Rather,
al-Qaeda seeks control of all of Pakistan, including its military, weapons
and economic capabilities. Al-Qaeda has been executing this strategy one
territory, one victory at a time. And it now closes in on Islamabad. 

Indeed, an analysis by the Pakistani Interior Ministry warned Pakistani
President Pervez Musharraf of precisely this. The
<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/30/world/asia/30pakistan.html?ex=1340856000&;
en=e2c12da3c09d9ee1&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss> New York Times reported
that the 15-page internal Pakistani document warned Musharraf that "the
influence of the extremists is swiftly bleeding east and deeper into his own
country, threatening areas like Peshawar, Nowshera and Kohat, which were
considered to be safeguarded by Pakistani government forces." The Interior
Ministry document said that Peshewar endures the "highest number of
terrorist incidents, including attacks on local police," and that in Bannu
and Tank regions, police are "patronizing the local Taliban and have
abdicated the role of law and order." 

It is important to note that Peshewar is the capital of the North West
Frontier Province (NWFP). Much of the Pakistani government, non-Islamist
educators, officials and police forces live inside heavily armed and walled
communities in the NWFP, where they are more safe from al-Qaeda attack. The
NWFP borders the Federally Administered Tribal Areas under direct
Taliban-al-Qaeda control on one side and the Pakistani capital of Islamabad
on the other. The rising violence is a clear indicator of the expansion of
al-Qaeda's insurgency as it marches patiently but steadily toward Islamabad.
As evidenced by bin Laden's latest message, that patience may be nearing an
end.

Usama bin Laden's latest message implored the Pakistani public to take up
arms against Musharraf and warned the army's soldiers to break ranks and
fight Musharraf with al-Qaeda rather than serve him. This is a sign that
al-Qaeda's patient approach to its Pakistan insurgency has run its course.
There could be a maelstrom of events to follow in Pakistan.

AQ Targets Police for Violence and Army Soldiers for Influence

The al-Qaeda Information Operation (IO) is designed to support the
insurgency's incremental march on Islamabad. The key to understanding the
al-Qaeda IO and its insurgency goals is to understand how al-Qaeda primarily
targets Pakistani Interior Ministry forces (police, constabularies and the
Frontier Corps) for physical attack while targeting Pakistani regular army
forces for influence and subversion.

The persistent mention of Pakistani police forces - rather than Pakistani
Army forces - is expected in any Pakistani Interior Ministry report, as the
Police forces fall under the Interior. But Pakistani police forces also
decidedly bear the brunt of al-Qaeda's lethal attacks and not the Pakistani
Army. It's not that al-Qaeda and their indigenous Taliban allies cannot
attack the Pakistani Army with expectations of success. They most certainly
can and have. With bin Laden's latest audio message delivering a combination
invitation and ultimatum to Pakistani Army soldiers, al-Qaeda's designs for
the Pakistani Army are more clearly visible. The reason for attacking
Pakistani police forces is two-fold and - in this writer's view - also the
most elusive and yet perhaps most important indicator of the ongoing
al-Qaeda insurgency. 

First, the Interior Ministry is widely regarded as the one segment of the
Pakistani government with unwavering loyalty to Musharraf, whom al-Qaeda has
sought to assassinate several times. Unlike the military and the military's
intelligence arm (ISI), the Pakistani police forces, constabularies and
Frontier Corps of the Interior Ministry do not have historical ties to
Islamist groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, al-Qaeda and the Taliban. Interior
Ministry loyalty to Musharraf makes their ranks logical targets for the
Islamists who seek to kill and replace Musharraf atop an Islamist-run
Pakistani government.

Secondly, and most importantly, al-Qaeda at the same time seeks to avoid
open bloody conflict with the Army. Not because it fears the deadly
consequences of such a confrontation, but rather because al-Qaeda senior
leadership wants the Pakistani military intact - for themselves. Ideally,
they do not want to ultimately find Musharraf killed or oustered only to
have the military splintered internally between pro-government and
pro-al-Qaeda commanders. Al-Qaeda is executing an insurgency to gain
control, not to touch off a civil war. 

In the end, al-Qaeda's design is also to co-opt an intact military in order
to gain command of a military force with the assets of a state (aircraft,
armor, etc.) and direct control of Pakistan's nuclear arsenal. Recent
reports of defections of Pakistani military elements since bin Laden's
latest message to them indicates a level of success in the al-Qaeda IO
campaign targeting them. 

Measuring al-Qaeda's PSYOP Success

Three weeks ago, well over 200 Pakistani Army soldiers surrendered to a much
smaller number of fighters from the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance without a shot
fired. But the al-Qaeda IO campaign primarily targeting the Pakistani
regular army forces has a spillover effect on other forces - and the general
populace - as well. It is reported in Pakistan that many soldiers in the
Pakistani Army, Frontier Corps paramilitary and police forces are refusing
to fight or putting up little fight against their own countrymen inside the
Federally Administered Tribal Area.

It is difficult to dispute the success of al-Qaeda's Psychological Warfare
efforts inside Pakistan. The message has been consistent for several years
and al-Qaeda's patience and restraint in seeing it through are significant
qualities of the terrorist organization turned insurgent group. With every
message and in all their forms, al-Qaeda has sought to convince the Army
soldiers that they are not al-Qaeda's enemy, rather that they are simply
being misled by Musharraf. In bin Laden's latest message, he said of the
Pakistani Army, "we see the armies becoming tools and weapons in the hands
of the Kuffaar [unbeliever, referencing Musharraf and the US] against the
Muslims." 

This message resonates, as many Pakistanis are reluctant to take up arms
against other Pakistanis, whether those they would confront are Taliban or
al-Qaeda or not. It must also be considered that upwards of 30% of the
Pakistani Army are, like the Taliban, ethnic Pashtuns. The vast majority of
them are enlisted foot soldiers, as very few ethnic Pashtuns hold leadership
positions, largely due to internal social and educational dynamics.

Even among the Pakistani police forces in the North West Frontier Province,
many are said to have requested leave or simply deserted when faced with the
outlook of deadly confrontations with fellow Pakistanis among the
Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance. In other instances, including the Interior
Ministry's report that specifically cited the Bannu and Tank regions, police
are "patronizing the local Taliban and have abdicated the role of law and
order." 

Where True Power Lies.And Grows

This is an indication that fear is also a prime motivator among Pakistanis.
In the North West Frontier Province capital of Peshawar, al-Qaeda's black
banner of jihad can be seen displayed in the widows of many shops and flying
in various places. This does not necessarily mean that there is explicit
support in the hearts and minds of all Pakistanis there - even among those
flying the al-Qaeda banner. 

Though Peshewar and the rest of the NWFP are technically under Pakistani
state control, this indicates a reflection among the populace of where the
true power lies - outside the walled communities where many government
employees and 'moderate' citizens take refuge. In many cases, the al-Qaeda
banner may well be flown simply out of self-protection to avoid attack on
their particular shops. 

The police cannot protect everyone all the time, but al-Qaeda and the
Taliban can attack at their choosing. And from a local's perspective, this
is where the true power lies. And as more and more Pakistanis in the police
forces, the Frontier Corps and the regular army begin to show a reluctance
to do battle, the al-Qaeda power in these region grows, both in measurable
means on the ground and within the minds of the Pakistani populace.

Such are the tangible gains of effective, persistent and robust al-Qaeda
information operations, a classic PSYOP directed at both the Pakistani
population writ large and also expressly directed at the Pakistani Army. As
a result, Pakistani forces are engaging al-Qaeda and the Taliban less and
less. In fact, President Musharraf announced that in 2008, there will be no
Pakistani Army activity at all in al-Qaeda-held territory, deferring
engagement to the less capable and less effective Frontier Corps and
Pakistani police and constabularies. 

Conclusions

The growing success of this long running al-Qaeda PSYOP makes it clear that
the defeat of al-Qaeda and the elimination of their global headquarters in
Pakistan will not come from Pakistani sources or initiative. As with so many
other theaters in this global conflict, the initiative must again come
directly from the United States. The American public and American political
leaders must prepare themselves for the reality that, at this stage,
defeating al-Qaeda in Pakistan most likely requires American boots on
Pakistani soil.

The continued disengagement from the fight by Pakistani military forces
unwilling to combat terrorists and insurgents within their own country is
indeed troubling. President Musharraf's
<http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C08%5C25%5Cstory_25-8-2
007_pg7_1> recent decision to fully disengage and withdraw his most capable
combat forces from the Federally Administered Tribal Areas by January 2008
certainly does not bode well for continued distanced engagement or
non-engagement by American forces. In the end, defeating al-Qaeda in
Pakistan will require direct American military action on the ground. The
alternative is to accept the consequences of a strengthening al-Qaeda
insurgency that is gaining momentum. 

There can therefore be little debate that al-Qaeda and its global
headquarters in Pakistan must be defeated before they consume Pakistan and
the assets of a nuclear-armed state with professional military forces. The
first step is an effective IO strategy of our own to counter this very
powerful aspect of the insurgency. At current, only Pervez Musharraf openly
engages the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance in the war of words and ideas within
Pakistan. Unfortunately, these efforts amount to little given his poor
domestic credibility. More Pakistani voices are required, and they must
address the Pakistani people, bottom up, in a credible manner.

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to