Not at all... B How secure are security clearances?
By Ben <http://www.fcw.com/cgi-bin/udt/fdc.collector?client_id=fcw&form_id=mailedit form&link_id=8&title=How%20secure%20are%20security%20clearances?&author=Ben% 20Bain&address=http%3A//www.fcw.com/online/news/150876%2D1.html&summary=Rece nt%20guilty%20plea%20of%20former%20FBI%2C%20CIA%20employee%20calls%20the%20p rocess%20into%20question> Bain Published on November 26, 2007 http://www.fcw.com/online/news/150876-1.html?type=pf The recent revelation that a Lebanese woman gained U.S. citizenship through a sham marriage and worked for the FBI and then the CIA for nearly a decade has placed the intelligence agencies' security clearance processes under scrutiny. Although Nada Nadim Prouty pleaded guilty Nov. 13 to conspiracy, unauthorized access to an FBI database and naturalization fraud charges, which could send her back to Lebanon, she leaves behind unanswered questions for U.S. officials. For instance, how did Prouty slip through repeated background investigations by both intelligence agencies, which failed to uncover that Prouty paid an unemployed U.S. citizen to marry her so she could gain citizenship in 1990? Furthermore, although the FBI hired her before the 2001 terrorist attacks heightened security awareness, some experts wonder how she managed to get a job with the CIA in 2003. In the past few years, the FBI introduced a new vetting process for foreign-born applicants. Even before those changes, however, Prouty's position as an FBI special agent required that she pass a polygraph test and that investigators conduct interviews with her former spouse - neither of which raised any flags. The incident is an opportunity for evaluation, said Stephen Kodak, an FBI spokesman. "FBI continually seeks and implements improvements to our background and selection process." The CIA also will continue to re-evaluate its policies and procedures around granting security clearances, said George Little, an agency spokesman. Neither agency would comment on the extent to which they shared information regarding Prouty's background investigations. Prouty left the FBI after four years, so the agency never conducted a mandatory five-year reinvestigation. "When she obtained employment at the CIA, she most likely received a polygraph," said Evan Lesser, director of Clearance- Jobs.com. "I would put most of the blame on the CIA vetting process for new hires. This is a rare exception of someone slipping through the cracks because they were a naturalized citizen before their FBI employment." Whether the security problems are widespread or acute, their existence is cause for concern, said Lawrence Halloran, deputy staff director for Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. "It doesn't have to be endemic as it only takes one spy," Halloran said. Prouty pleaded guilty to unlawfully searching the FBI's Automated Case Support computer system for information about an FBI Detroit field office investigation into Hezbollah in 2003. Prouty was not charged with espionage or sending information to the terrorist organization. But court documents mention that her sister had attended fundraising events where a leading Hezbollah figure was the keynote speaker. The Office of Personnel Management handles 90 percent of the background investigations for agencies. However, some excepted agencies, such as the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency, handle their own processes, said Michael Orenstein, an OPM spokesman. When an employee wishes to transfer to another agency, as Prouty did, departments usually have reciprocity that extends between the excepted service agencies and nonexcepted agencies. However, if some part of the new job warrants additional investigation into the applicant's background, agencies might pursue further inquiries, Orenstein added. The 2004 Intelligence Reform Terrorism Prevention Act aimed to improve reciprocity among agencies by having OPM manage a database with background information from various federal agencies. "The problem with the system is that it varies," Halloran said. "The answer to this in terms of reciprocity is to standardize the process." (F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with "Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
