" the man who today would be Commander-in-Chief , John S. McCain, III, stood
up for Fake Warrior (and Senate colleague) John Kerry against the
overwhelming evidence that his atrocity stories were damaging lies, eclipsed
only by his fraudulent s



http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=E4314996-F86C-49B2-BCAE-
7D3D042A2240
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=E4314996-F86C-49B2-BCAE
-7D3D042A2240> 
To Set The Record Straight 
By Henry Mark Holzer, FrontPageMagazine.com, 22 January 2008

If John Kerry had been elected President of the United States in 
November 2004, especially with the incoming majority Democrat 
Congress, it is highly likely that Iraq would be in the midst of a 
civil war, Iran's regional influence would have increased, Israel 
would be in more jeopardy than it is now, two Supreme Court seats 
would be occupied by clones of John Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsburg 
instead of by John Roberts and Samuel Alito, judicial decisions would 
have given even more "rights" to enemy combatants, domestic 
entitlements and earmarks would have skyrocketed, the Bush tax cuts 
would be history. And more!

Thankfully, Kerry was defeated. A new book by authors Scott Swett 
and Tim Ziegler, To Set the Record Straight, demonstrates that much 
of the credit for that defeat needs to go not to the "compassionate 
conservative" who now occupies the White House, but instead to 
Vietnam War swift boat veterans and former prisoners of war 
-and the "new media."

Before getting to a discussion of To Set the Record Straight, 
however, it is necessary in the name of full disclosure to reveal 
that Erika Holzer (my wife) and I were actively involved in 
unmasking John Kerry for what he is: a "Fake Warrior."

When in 2003 our book Fake Warriors: Identifying, Exposing, and 
Punishing Those Who Falsify Their Military Service was published, 
little did we know that Kerry would soon emerge as the quintessential 
Fake Warrior.

Given our sensitivity to the Fake Warrior problem, when the 2004 
election campaign began with constant references to Kerry's Vietnam 
War "heroism," and at the later Democrat Party nominating 
convention, he saluted and announced that "I'm John Kerry and 
I'm reporting for duty," our "phony meter" needle jumped into the red 
zone.

As a result, as page 202 of To Set the Record Straight recounts,

"On August 20 [2004], law professor and author Hank Holzer and his 
wife Erika reported in FrontPageMagazine.com that although the DD214 
[record of separation from service] posted on Kerry's campaign 
website cited a 'Silver Star with combat V,' no 'combat V' for 
valor had ever been issued with the Silver Star award.
The Holzers followed up four days later with a detailed analysis of 
the unusual fact that Kerry had received three separate citations 
for his Silver Star. The original citation, which was available from 
the Navy, but not posted on the Kerry campaign's website, described 
Kerry as pursuing and killing a single Viet Cong soldier. However, 
the two subsequent citations omitted the fleeing (and wounded) enemy 
soldier entirely, merely reporting that Kerry had 'led a landing 
party ashore in pursuit of the enemy.' The Holzers wondered how 
Kerry might have persuaded four-star Navy admiral John Hyland to 
reissue a sanitized version of his award, and speculated that the 
answer probably had to do with Kerry's friendship with Senator 
Edward Kennedy."

When we wrote those articles and several others showing that 
candidate Kerry was a military phony, we were not yet aware of just 
how much other evidence existed proving conclusively that he was 
actually the worst Fake Warrior in American political history.

Much of that evidence would be presented in the best-selling book by 
John O'Neill, Esq. and Dr. Jerome R. Corso, Unfit for Command, a 
crucial weapon in the fight against Kerry's candidacy. There were 
other weapons, too, all of which were leveled at Kerry's lies and 
slanders, too many of which obtained undeserved traction 
with the Kerry-favoring media, self-serving politicians, and a 
too-gullible public.

It is the authors' task in To Set the Record Straight to explain 
what brought the veterans' campaign against Kerry and Unfit for 
Command to life and, to quote the book's Introduction, to show

"how an ad hoc collection of veterans and political activists 
overcame their opponents' efforts to silence and marginalize them, 
and delivered the explosive proof about John Kerry's past to the 
public."

In essence, their book shows the political/cultural application of 
Isaac Newton's Third Law of Motion: "For every action, there is an 
equal and opposite reaction." John Kerry's presidential campaign book 
("action") caused the Swift Boat veterans to organize ("reaction").
And it was the abominable McCain-Feingold law's successful attack on 
free speech (proudly co-sponsored by Kerry) ("action") that provided 
a vehicle for the Swifties to bury Kerry in a pit of his own lies 
("reaction").

It is usually difficult to pinpoint exactly when a political or 
cultural movement begins, and so it is with what would become the 
Swift Boat organization during the 2004 election.

Probably, it began in the spring of 1971 when a young former Marine 
sergeant named Bruce Kesler publicly denounced Kerry's Vietnam 
Veterans Against the War (VVAW) and created a small ad hoc group 
called Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace.

That June, Kessler, O'Neill (a swift boat veteran), and eight other 
veterans held a press conference, stating that the group's purpose 
was to support creation of "a viable South Vietnam with the 
capability for self-defense" and, domestically, "to advocate for 
better benefits for Vietnam veterans."

In his statement, O'Neill challenged Kerry's assumed leadership of 
Vietnam veterans and, at the end of that month, made his anti-Kerry, 
anti-VVAW case on the now famous Dick Cavett television show. Much 
of the O'Neill-Kerry exchange is presented in To Set the Record 
Straight, making it clear that O'Neill had the facts belying 
Kerry's atrocity tales and that Kerry lied and obfuscated about them.

Following that legendary TV show, a variety of individuals and ad 
hoc groups tried to get out the truth about the war and expose the 
slanders and lies of Kerry and other anti-war activists and 
propagandists, especially about their atrocity stories.

The veterans didn't meet with great success, and for years the issue 
remained quiescent, arising only whenever something popped up to 
remind Americans of antics like VVAW's earlier demonstrations or when 
Hanoi Jane Fonda was in the news.

Unfortunately, alleged American atrocities in Viet Nam and John 
Kerry's military and political "heroism" were indelibly imprinted on 
the American public's collective consciousness.

At least, that is, until 2003, when narcissist Kerry released his 
campaign biography. Entitled Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the Vietnam 
War, it was written by the then-respected historian Douglas Brinkley.

It is a measure of how invested Kerry was in his self-created hero 
legend, and how blind he was to the potential pitfalls of the truth 
that he apparently failed to realize that Tour of Duty: John Kerry 
and the Vietnam War would presage his political downfall.

The book ("action") put Kerry's antiwar conduct and alleged heroism 
in play, courting the inevitable ("reaction").

And it was not long in coming.

In late January 2004, retired Rear Admiral Roy Hoffmann - commander 
of the Navy's Swift Boat operation in Vietnam in 1968 and 1969 - read 
Tour of Duty.
Among other serious misgivings about the book, Hoffmann was greatly 
offended by being compared with "the crazed and murderous Colonel 
Kurtz in Francis Ford Coppola's film Apocalypse Now"- yet another 
iteration of Kerry's earlier fantasy stories about American 
atrocities.

In response, Hoffmann contacted some former Swifties, and the ball 
began rolling.
Soon, veterans from all over the country were disputing Kerry's 
stories about atrocities and his alleged valor, and a consensus 
developed that Kerry was unfit for the presidency and the 
Commander-in-Chief position it conferred.

At a meeting on April 4, 2004, "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" was 
conceived. On April 23, 2004, about six months before election day, 
the organization was born when, as a "527" not-for-profit, it filed 
with the IRS.

Ironically, because of the Kerry co-sponsored McCain-Feingold 
legislation muzzling certain political speech (another "action"), 
the Swifties had to choose the 527 not-for-profit organizational form 
(another "reaction") - which, as it turned out, would make possible 
large financial contributions that enabled the Swifties to 
disseminate the truth about Kerry's atrocity lies and military 
self-aggrandizement.

To Set the Record Straight tells that dramatic story, providing 
many, and some shocking, details not well known until now:

* Who the Swifties and other veterans who came forward were, 
why they stepped up, and at what personal cost.

* The organization's disappointing - indeed, sabotaged - 
first press conference.

* How the mainstream media carried Kerry's water, dumping on the 
Swifties at every opportunity.

* Swifty circumvention of that biased media by use of the Internet.

* Internal organization of the pro-truth, anti-Kerry effort, and its 
chain of command.

* Conceiving, researching, writing, publishing, and promoting the 
O'Neill-Corsi blockbuster book about Kerry, whose title said it all: 
Unfit for Command.

* Development and utilization of the Swifties' television campaign.

* Kerry's counterattack, and why it failed.

* How former POWs joined the Swifties' effort, and their impact.

* Exposing Kerry's phony medals and awards, and his quick exit from Vietnam.

For all of this, and more, To Set the Record Straight provides 
thorough sourcing, demonstrating that "the story about the story" is 
as credible as the original Unfit for Command story itself.

Yet, there is one paragraph in the book that tantalizes, leaving the 
reader wanting more information.

The authors write concerning the press conference for the 
anti-Kerry film, Stolen Honor, one POW arrived late for the press 
conference, Col. George 'Bud' Day.
Day was a legendary military figure, a veteran of WWII, Korea and 
Vietnam who had been awarded the Medal of Honor for his incredible 
12-day effort to escape from his captors after his F-100F Misty FAC 
was shot down over North Vietnam in August 1967. Senator John 
McCain, his former cellmate in Vietnam, had called Day 'one of the 
greatest men I have had the honor to know."
Now, Bud Day was at McCain's Washington office, asking his old 
friend to tone down his criticism of the Swift Vets. Day pointed 
out, as had Admiral Roy Hoffmann, that the Swifties were witnesses 
to what Kerry had done in Vietnam, but Kerry was not."
(My emphasis.) (The source for this statement, another POW, is
unimpeachable.)

Yes, the man who today would be Commander-in-Chief of the armed 
forces of the United States, John S. McCain, III, stood up for Fake 
Warrior (and Senate colleague) John Kerry against the overwhelming 
evidence that his atrocity stories were damaging lies, eclipsed only 
by his fraudulent self-created tales of heroism in Vietnam.

Were the full story of McCain's attempt to undermine the Swifties 
and bolster the faker Kerry known in detail today, perhaps he would 
not be doing so well in some of the [not-so-]Republican primaries.

But despite McCain's, the media's, the Kerry campaign's, and the 
Democrat Party's attempts to vilify and destroy the Swifties, in 
the end they had created what the authors of To Set the Record 
Straight describe as

"the multi-pronged information campaign that would produce the 
nation's most popular book, the Internet's hottest political 
website, and the most effective TV ad campaign in American political 
history."

Too modestly, they neglect to say that the Swifties, contributed 
mightily to saving the American Republic from the world-class 
opportunistic, slandering, self-serving, Fake Warrior, John F. Kerry.

Henry Mark Holzer, Professor Emeritus at Brooklyn Law School, is a 
constitutional lawyer and author most recently of The Supreme Court 
Opinions of Clarence Thomas, 1991-2006, A Conservative's Perspective.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to