<http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/02/chads_future_taliban_enters_ca.php>
Chad's Future Taliban enters capital while the West is asleep

Today, February 02, 2008, 4 hours ago | Walid Phares
http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/02/chads_future_taliban_enters_ca.php
<http://counterterrorismblog.org/2008/02/chads_future_taliban_enters_ca.php>
Go to full article

As Americans are debating who among their candidates for the primaries can
best confront the Jihadists or at least preempt their offensives worldwide,
future Jihadi forces have in one day invaded an African country (under
European protection), a key location for the Darfur forthcoming Peace
missions. In less than 12 hours the so-called armed opposition of Chad,
crossed the entire country from its Eastern frontiers with Islamist-ruled
Sudan to the capital N'Djamena across from Northern Nigeria. The latest
reports mention fierce battles around the Presidential Palace and back and
forth inside the city. But at this stage the geo-political consequences are
crucial for the next stages locally, regionally and internationally. The
bottom line is that in one day, what could become the future Taliban of Chad
have scored a strategic victory not only against the Government of the
country (which was supposed to back up the UN plans to save Darfur in Sudan)
but also against the efforts by the African Union and European Union to
contain the Sudanese regime and stop the Genocide. Today's offensive,
regardless of the next developments, has already changed the geopolitics of
Africa. Outmaneuvering the West and Africans, those regimes and forces
standing behind the "opposition" have shown that they are restless in their
campaign against human rights and self determination on the continent. But
even more importantly the events of today shows how unprepared are Europeans
and Americans in front of Jihadi regimes which seem weak on the surface but
highly able to surprise and crumble Western efforts of containment.

On Saturday February 2, 2008, and as French President Nicolas Sarkozy was
getting married in Paris and Americans were shopping for food to enjoy the
"super Bowl" on Sunday, Jihadi-backed military forces launched a blitzkrieg
across Chad using one thousand 4 X 4 armed trucks. They reached the capital
in few hours and started battling the Chadian Army isolating the President
in his Palace and declaring victory to the international media. This
so-called "opposition" has a Unified "Military Command" and includes: The
Union of Forces for Democracy (UFDD) led by Mahamat Nouri, Rally of Forces
for Change (RFC) led by Timane Erdimi, and the UFDD-Fundamental led by
Abdelwahid Aboud Mackaye. At first sight a non seasoned observer would
conclude that this is yet another African troubled country with a bunch of
"separatists," "rebels" and "insurgents." In fact it is not that simple.
These forces have been backed by the Jihadi regime in Khartoum and some of
its funding -according to the Chadian Government- has been sent from Saudi
Arabia. 

At the center of the confrontation is Darfur. This Black Muslim province
inside Sudan has been the victim of Genocide at the hands of Arab
fundamentalist forces known as the Janjaweed, essentially backed by the
regime of Sudan. The people of Darfur have resisted the forced "Arabization"
-turned ethnic cleansing- at the hands of the Janjaweed. Both neighboring
Chad and the United Nations came to the help of Darfur since 2005. In
return, the Salafists and Wahabis of the region came to the support of
Sudan's regime against the Africans and the West. France dispatched some
military units to Chad and soon a "Eurofor" (European Force) was set under
UN auspices to be dispatched on the borders between Chad and Sudan to help
the Darfur refugees. The Islamists of Khartoum opposed the international
initiative and seems to have enlisted -although discretely- the backing of
the Wahabi circles in Saudi Arabia, but also the Syrian and Iranian regimes.
Hence the battlefield for Darfur became a fault line between the
international community and the strange bed fellows of the Jihadi axis.

Using the classical doctrine of Khid'aa (or deception) the Khartoum regime
bought as much time as it needed to allow the arming and training of the
"rebels" inside Chad. The equipment used by the militias has been obtained
in few months and "offices" were opened in several countries in the region.
Oil dividends quickly poured on the future Taliban of Chad and their
political and media training went very fast. All what the Sudanese regime
had to do to abort the forthcoming Darfur UN operations was to collapse the
basis from where these operations will be launched: Chad. The question is
not about how did the Jihadists figure this out, it is rather how the
strategists in Washington and Paris failed to predict it. Although it was
very simple: Movements on the ground inside Chad and intense media activity
in support on al Jazeera for months projected what was to come. How did the
Atlantic allies fail to see the threat gathering is stunning? 

For Western and international defense systems to dramatically fail to
monitor and detect the movement of thousands of armed men crossing an allied
country from border to border is alarming. The US has just organized an
African Command -backed by the highest technologies worldwide- and the
French military have a presence in Faya Largau as well as a jet squadron in
the capital ready to scramble. Was there an abandonment? Was there a deal
cut on Darfur? We will see. However the most interesting development -along
with the militia's blitzkrieg, was the preparedness of the Jihadi propaganda
machine. Amazingly, as the "opposition" forces have reached N'Djamena the
official minister of what could become the future Taliban regime in Chad,
Jibrin Issa was comfortably seated in al Jazeera's studios in Qatar.
Obviously he wasn't flown from Africa to the Gulf on the request of the
booking Department of the Qatari funded network to "react" to the offensive.
He was already at the station -or at least in Qatar-when the offensive
began. Very interestingly, the man was wearing a classical Western business
outfit and clean shaved. The PR strategy was to show the world, including
France and the US, that the forces thrusting into their ally wasn't a sister
of the Islamic Courts of Somalia or a Taliban "looking" militia. The game
was to project this coup as "domestic" against "corruption" and the rest of
the litany, thus boring for average Western public. 

Issa played the script very well until a point where reality surfaced
abruptly. At first, as I was listening to his impeccable Arabic, I was
wondering why did he have this Arabian Peninsula accent and utter those
mechanical sentences. It was strange to hear an African "minister" of a
future regime in Chad speaking excellent Arabic, but I gave it a pass.
Until, at the end of his interview he made a troubling mistake. Out of the
blue he started to thank the "brave commander of the Islamic Republic of
Sudan" General Omar al Bashir (the head of the regime responsible for the
Genocide in Darfur) for his help to the "movement" and started to praise his
"highness the servant of the two shrines," (that is the Saudi Monarch) for
his support (obviously to the movement). Suddenly, and despite the
frustration of the al jazeera anchor that the game may have been exposed, I
connected the dots. It was indeed a Sudanese-backed operation to change the
regime in Chad, and backed by Wahabi circles, as a preemptive move to
crumble the forthcoming humanitarian operation in Darfur. The Jihadists,
kings of strategies, won another day. To preempt a UN move against one of
their regimes (Sudan) they took out the Government which had agreed to help
the UN and the West. In my sense this was highly predictable. But the
failure of the West to predict is highly questionable. 

The days ahead may shape or reshape the ground in Chad and the direction of
events could lead to more dramatic change in the political landscape in
Africa. If Washington and Paris tergiversate, the future Chadian Taliban
will consolidate their grip and thrust further into the Sahara. The Darfur
operation will be doomed. If the Chadian Army resist and the international
community intervene,the status quo ante could be restored.It is also
predicted that the "opposition" will work hard on is image. It will try not
to show the "Jihadi" identity immediately. Besides, not all components of
the "opposition" are Taliban-type. When the opposition settles in the
capital, the Islamists will slowly surge and strategically behead their
allies a la Afghanistan. It is really too early to tell. 

For now, Americans are busy watching the game, electing nominees and
questioning their candidates as to who has the best "credentials" to win the
war on terror. In France the debate is about where will the Presidential
couple spend their honeymoon. Let's admit it, the Jihadi strategists are
having a blast. One more country has fallen on the way to Constantinople. 

******

Dr Walid Phares is the Director of the Future Terrorism Project at the
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and a visiting scholar at the
European Foundation for Democracy. He is the author of the best seller
Future Jihad and the recent War of Ideas.

(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to