Please find below an example of my continuing coverage for UPI of the U.S. military and its role in the "war of ideas." A shorter version is slated for publication in the Washington Times tomorrow. You may link to the full-length version on the Web here:
HYPERLINK http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Emerging_Threats/Analysis/2008/02/06/analysis_us_cuts_critique_of_islam_film/1507/ http://www.upi.com/International_Security/Emerging_Threats/Analysis/2008/02/06/analysis_us_cuts_critique_of_islam_film/1507/ Please note that the story remains the copyright property of UPI. For more information about UPI products and services, please get in touch with me or e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shaun Waterman UPI Homeland and National Security Editor 202 898 8081 [EMAIL PROTECTED] U.S. military cuts critique of Dutch Islam film By SHAUN WATERMAN UPI Homeland and National Security Editor WASHINGTON, Feb. 6 (UPI) -- The U.S. military in Afghanistan has removed from its Web site an article criticizing a Dutch lawmaker's controversial plan to make a film condemning the Koran, saying the piece was being misinterpreted as an attack on free speech. The article, titled "Stirring the Hate," said Geert Wilders and his Party for Freedom were "blaming an entire religion for the actions of extremists." It accused them of having benefited politically from previous controversies, like that over the 2005 publication of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed. It put the phrase "exercise in free speech" in derisive or distancing quotation marks. "The headlines that resulted from the violence (that followed the cartoons' publication), the fear generated in communities around the world, an increase in 'suicide bomber recruiting,' all further the terrorist's goals," reads the article. "While the Party for Freedom preaches hate and fear to its followers, the terrorists preach hate and vengeance to their own." Wilders' 10-minute film, which he now plans to release in March, will show how the Muslim holy book "is an inspiration for intolerance, murder and terror," he said recently. Other reports have quoted him as comparing the book to Hitler's "Mein Kampf." The U.S. military article was authored by a member of the public affairs team for Coalition Joint Task Force-82, which commands the U.S. troops in the country as part of NATO's International Security Assistance Force. It was posted on Jan. 21 and taken down on Jan. 30, the author, Master Sgt. Allen Ness, told United Press International. A copy was kept by journalist and blogger Bill Roggio, who shared it with UPI. "It was being viewed not as a criticism of his position on Islam, but as criticism of his right to free speech," Ness said. "I never had any disagreement with his right to free speech. What I disagreed with was his blanket condemnation of Islam." He said he was motivated to write it by his concerns about "what could happen when the fundamentalist supporters of terror get hold of his film" if it was deeply insulting to Islam like the Mohammed cartoons. "Our most important allies here are the Afghans: the police, the military, the population as a whole -- they are all Muslims," said Ness, pointing out that the country was called the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan. He said the riots in Afghanistan over the Mohammed cartoons -- which Wilders' party republished on its Web site -- had "caused great damage and loss of life," but just as importantly had "damaged the trust that we had built up with the Afghans." The incident shows the difficulties that the U.S. military sometimes has in calibrating the weaponry it uses on the battlefield of ideas, said Roggio, a writer specializing in counter-insurgency who has spent time embedded with U.S. and Afghan forces. "I understand where they were coming from" with the article, he told UPI. If rioting broke out, Afghan security forces would have to take to the streets to confront angry mobs who would often be attacking Western symbols. "The military fights alongside these guys. The way they see it is they are fighting extremists trying to hijack a religion," and provocations like Wilders' film were not helpful. "It is damaging to the legitimacy" of Afghan security forces if they are "seen as protecting those who have insulted the religion." Roggio said the article was "well-intentioned but not fully thought through" and was "open to misinterpretation." John Brennan, the former head of the U.S. government's National Counter-Terrorism Center, said the issue was particularly difficult because the article had appeared on a U.S. military official Web site. "People will see it as the position of the U.S. government if it is there," he said. "It is different from a private commentary." "I am not one of those who comb the Web looking for politically correct outrages," said Roggio, "but it read to me like a criticism of his right to free speech." "He does have the right to free speech," he continued, referring to Wilders, "and I have the right to think he is stupid and irresponsible." No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.20/1262 - Release Date: 2/6/2008 9:13 AM [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL PROTECTED] -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
