About time to reconsider the utillity of NATO along with the UN.
 
B
 
 
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080207/ts_nm/afghan_nato_dc_1;_ylt=Ank.nXhrr.uR
AKSUZGE8BmbOVooA
 

NATO chief rejects U.S. concern over Afghan combat 


By Patrick Lannin and Sue Pleming Thu Feb 7, 6:57 AM ET 

VILNIUS/KABUL (Reuters) - NATO's top official rejected on Thursday U.S.
concern that some member countries were not pulling their weight in the
fighting in Afghanistan. 

On a visit to troops in Afghanistan with British Foreign Secretary David
Miliband, U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice kept up the pressure on
reluctant allies to share the combat burden against the Taliban.

"Frankly, I hope there will be more troop contributions and there needs to
be more Afghan forces," Rice told reporters traveling with her on the flight
from London.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates laid bare U.S. concern about NATO on
Wednesday when he said the alliance could split into countries that were
willing to "fight and die to protect people's security and those who were
not."

NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer said he believed more forces
were needed in Afghanistan where attacks by Taliban and al Qaeda fighters
have soared in the past two years.

But he rejected fears expressed by Gates that NATO could develop into a
two-tiered alliance, based on a country's willingness to fight.

"I do not see a two-tier alliance, there is one alliance," de Hoop Scheffer
told reporters as he arrived in Vilnius, where Gates and 25 other NATO
defense ministers were due to meet.

The NATO-led ISAF force has about 43,000 troops in Afghanistan. Canada,
Britain, the United States and the Netherlands are involved in most of the
fierce fighting in the south, and they want other countries to contribute
more.

On Wednesday Germany said it would send around 200 combat soldiers to
northern Afghanistan as part of a NATO Quick Reaction Force but would not
move troops to the south.

"My view is you can't have some allies whose sons and daughters die in
combat and other allies who are shielded from that kind of a sacrifice,"
Gates told the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee.

CLOUD OVER ALLIANCE

He said the difference in attitude put a cloud over the future of the
alliance.

Rice said alliance members needed to "come together to give enough military
power to do what needs to be done on the front end of the counter-insurgency
effort."

After flying into the Afghan capital Kabul, Rice and Miliband traveled in a
U.S. military plane to a sprawling base in the southern city of Kandahar,
the birthplace of the Taliban and the main city in Afghanistan's most
volatile region.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown told parliament on Wednesday he wanted
NATO allies at a summit in Bucharest in April to commit to a fair sharing of
the task.

"We have 15 percent of the troops in Afghanistan ... We need a proper burden
sharing not only in terms of personnel but also in terms of helicopters and
other equipment," he said.

Canada's minority government plans a parliamentary vote of confidence late
next month on prolonging its military mission in Afghanistan, officials said
on Wednesday.

The country's three opposition parties -- which between them control
parliament -- reject the idea of an extension. 

"We want to see more of a one-for-all approach, including more
burden-sharing in south," Canadian defense Minister Peter MacKay told
reporters in Vilnius, reaffirming a demand for reinforcements to help its
2,500 troops in Kandahar province. 

(Writing by Robert Woodward; editing by Elizabeth Piper)



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to