Mitt may be the only one that can accomplish this task. No one else comes to
mind.


'Post-Industrial' America Needs Can-Do Leader


By VICTOR
<http://www.ibdeditorials.com/AuthorProfile.aspx?id=255650637395649> DAVIS
HANSON | Posted Monday, July 21, 2008 4:30 PM PT 

In the last 20 years, we were lectured constantly about "post industrial"
America.

The U.S. had evolved into an "information society" of "high tech jobs."
Traditional sources of strength - manufacturing, the production of food and
fuel, and the assembling of cars and trucks - were passe.

Instead, others less fortunate abroad were to do those grubby tasks, while
Americans, with their BlackBerrys and laptops, funded, organized, lectured
and critiqued them.

Illegal aliens might cook our meals or change our children's diapers to free
us up for far more important tasks of litigation, finance and environmental
review. Chinese would make everything from our shoes to our phones. Japanese
would supply us with quality high-end goods like cars and cameras. Africans,
Arabs, Iranians, Russians and Venezuelans would drill oil in nasty, dirty
places so we wouldn't have to. Even our food - which would be always in
season - would increasingly be shipped in from Mexico and South America.

Refined Americans became more concerned over questions of gender, race and
class justice in our universities and courtrooms, as if the chief problem
were only dividing the American pie equitably, rather than expanding it.

The real source of American wealth apparently was the mere fact that we were
Americans. Therefore, the rest of the world should naturally loan us money
to sustain our envied lifestyle. Our homes got bigger, and we bought and
sold them more as investments than as places to raise our families.

Our graduates opted for Wall Street, insurance, law, journalism and
academia. Why not, when laws made it more conducive to invest and trade, but
harder and less lucrative to build, drill, farm and manufacture?

Our universities bragged they were teaching the world how to design and
engineer - as our own kids gravitated to law and management schools. We
relied on a paternalistic government to regulate what we shouldn't do rather
than turn to our best and brightest to show us what we could.

Alas, no successful civilization in history - Greece, Rome, England, France,
the list goes on - ever found prosperity through its bureaucrats and
lawyers.

The result of all this growing American laxity and condescension is mixed.

The good news, aside from the fact we've never had it so good, is that
millions in China are no longer starving. Japan talks of marketing hybrid
cars, not re-establishing its old Co-Prosperity Sphere. The Persian Gulf
looks more like Las Vegas than the badlands of Waziristan. Billions in the
new globalized world are emulating the American middle class, which, for all
the caricatures, still represents freedom and affluence.

The downside is a growing collective panic at home over whether such
progress is sustainable when the U.S. is up to its neck in debt, dependent
on foreign energy and plagued by self-doubt and inaction.

Our 21st-century paralysis is surprising. The U.S. is not materially
exhausted. We sit atop trillions of dollars worth of oil, gas, coal, shale
and tar sands. We could mine more uranium and reprocess fuels to build
hundreds of nuclear plants. Our agriculture is blessed with the best soils,
most developed irrigation systems and most productive and astute farmers.

There is as much sun and wind in the West as anywhere in the world. We have
plenty of natural resources and the know-how to make all the wood, steel and
cement products we need.

A new, hungrier generation of Americans will have to want to reclaim our
pre-eminence and change the national attitude. It must be ready to pay off
generations of debt rather than borrow; build rather than sue; drill rather
than whine.

It's time to honor rather than avoid and outsource physical labor. Our
children are healthy enough to cut our own lawns and pick our fruit. Let's
also hope they want to hear more about Gen. David Petraeus' success and less
of Madonna's psychodramas.

Just as important, what Americans need now is leadership to get moving -
rather than more platitudes about hope, squabbling about race and gender,
and endless rhetoric about who is really a maverick or a true conservative
or the most liberal. What we need to know from our candidates are specifics
about how to jump-start America.

How many more barrels of oil, refineries and megawatts will America produce
- and when and how? How much debt will the next administration retire - and
when and how. How and when will our schools return to knowledge-based rather
than the present (and failing) therapeutic curriculum?

Americans, in short, should be tired of hearing that we are a
post-industrial, postmodern, post-anything society.

Instead, we want to be known again as a can-do producer nation that sweats
as much as it thinks. And the confident presidential candidate who can best
assure us of that will surely win this election.

C 2008 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to