Talk, talk, talk...supposedly a nuclear-armed Iran would not be acceptable
either...
 
Talk's cheap.
 
B  

NATO chief says Pakistan terror sanctuaries not acceptable
Posted: 25 July 2008 0428 hrs 

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/afp_asiapacific/view/362618/1/.html

KABUL: The NATO chief on Thursday called for Pakistan to be more involved in
tackling extremist bases on its soil, as Afghanistan was hit by new attacks
with at least 34 Taliban bodies found after one battle. 

NATO was concerned by a spike in terror attacks but would not enter Pakistan
to hunt down militants based there, the alliance's Secretary General Jaap de
Hoop Scheffer also told reporters in Kabul. 

Scheffer was visiting amid high tension between Afghanistan and Pakistan
over the violence, including the bombing of the Indian embassy here this
month that Kabul has directly blamed on its neighbour's intelligence agency.


"I cannot think of anyone who would consider it acceptable that many
terrorists from all over the world gather in a certain area and create
mischief and havoc there," Scheffer told reporters, in a reference to
militant bases in Pakistan. 

"The bottom line is that the present situation cannot be acceptable for
anyone," Scheffer told reporters after talks with President Hamid Karzai. 

Afghan and Western officials have long said that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda
have been able to regroup in Pakistan's semi-autonomous tribal areas after
they were expelled from Afghanistan in 2001 in a US-led invasion. 

Some accuse Islamabad of not doing enough to tackle them and criticise its
efforts to negotiate peace deals. 

Karzai reiterated his call for the focus of the international effort against
extremism to be focused on militant hideouts across the border. 

"The fight against terrorism is not in Afghanistan and we will not be secure
and safe ... (unless we) address the question of sanctuaries in Pakistan,
the terrorist training camps there and the motivation that they are given
there." 

Scheffer said Pakistan had to be part of the solution to the problem. 

"Our forces in Afghanistan are also the victims of the surge and uptick in
violent incidents we have seen recently. But let us practise a regional
approach and let us involve all the regional actors here," he said. 

In new violence in Afghanistan Thursday, security forces were ambushed on
the main road between Kabul and Kandahar and fought back in an hours-long
battle. 

"At least 34 enemy dead bodies are at the battlefield but we believe there
are many more killed," defence ministry spokesman Mohammed Zahir Azimi told
AFP. 

The interior ministry said 70 militants were killed in the fighting in Shah
Joy, which is about 200 kilometres (125 miles) from the southern city of
Kandahar. Among the dead were two Arabs and four Chechens, it said. 

The Afghan army was deployed on the key road this month after a surge in
attacks along the route. Taliban have captured several Afghans travelling on
the road and killed them, accusing them of working for the government and
its allies. 

In the central province of Ghazni meanwhile, a joint NATO-Afghan operation
to take back Ajristan district had left 15 militants dead, a provincial
government spokesman said. 

A remote-controlled bomb destroyed a police vehicle in the eastern province
of Paktia on Thursday, killing four policemen and wounding two others, said
deputy provincial police chief Ghulam Dastageer Azad. 

Taliban fighters also ambushed a police vehicle on patrol in the
southwestern province of Farah overnight and killed three policemen another
police official said. 

The hardline Islamic Taliban were in government between 1996 and 2001 when
they were driven out in a US-led invasion. - AFP/de 

 
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to