http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080728.wafghan28/BNStor
y/Afghanistan/
 

UN envoy backs Karzai against Pakistan


Canadian the first Western diplomat to publicly support Afghan leader's
accusation that Islamabad spies are behind recent attacks 

 

GRAEME SMITH 

>From Monday's Globe and Mail

July 28, 2008 at 3:47 AM EDT

KABUL - Pakistan's intelligence agents are likely responsible for recent
attacks in Afghanistan, and the international community should support the
Afghan government's complaints about such activity, a senior United Nations
envoy says.

Chris Alexander, a former Canadian ambassador now serving as a UN deputy
special representative in Afghanistan, says he believes the Afghan
authorities, who say their neighbour's spy service is sending terrorists
across the border.

President Hamid Karzai has accused Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence
agency of plotting many spectacular attacks in his country in recent months,
including an attempt on his life and an embassy bombing that killed at least
41 people in Kabul.

"We have to ask ourselves, was Karzai right on this point?" Mr. Alexander
said in an interview. "I think the answer is yes." 

 



 
<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080726.wvemmerson26/Vi
deoStory/Afghanistan/?pid=RTGAM.20080728.wafghan28> 

Foreign Affairs Minister David Emerson says Canada may expand its troop
commitment in Afghanistan by almost 10 per cent



 <javascript:;> 

In his first in-depth remarks after visiting Afghanistan and Iraq, Barack
Obama said Iraq's political gains lag behind security strides

While many foreign officials and analysts have privately endorsed Mr.
Karzai's view of the ISI, Mr. Alexander is the first Western diplomat to
back the accusation in public.

"If we support him as President of Afghanistan, and we support the cause of
peace and security in Afghanistan, we should be prepared to speak lucidly
about these issues as well, and not be given pause or forced to back down
simply because there's a reaction from someone who, quite frankly, is
speaking for the spoilers," Mr. Alexander said.

"Let's have some international courage on this front." 

Western diplomats have previously said they tread carefully with Pakistan in
part because of the country's fragile politics, its mistrust of foreign
pressure and its nuclear arsenal.

When asked how Islamabad might react to blunt accusations of waging a proxy
war, Mr. Alexander shrugged. "I'm not sure, but there's only one way to find
out. The project on which we're embarked - with its high stakes, with its
serious investment, with its sacrifices - deserves at least that level of
courage with regard to this issue. Otherwise we really are pretending that
Niagara Falls doesn't flow." 

Islamabad has consistently denied using intelligence services to interfere
with its neighbour, but Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani bowed to
international pressure on the weekend by removing the ISI from military
control and placing it under the Interior Ministry's civilian supervision.

The head of Pakistan's ruling party said the move was intended to deflect
criticism of the spy agency and the announcement was timed to coincide with
Mr. Gilani's visit to Washington today for talks with U.S. President George
W. Bush.

But the switch to civilian oversight was only a symbolic gesture and could
aggravate the chaotic situation in Pakistan as power brokers struggle for
control of the spy agency, according to an assessment published yesterday by
Strategic Forecasting Inc., a private intelligence firm.

"Increased civilian say over the affairs of the agency will, in the short
term, add to the crisis of governance faced by the state," the assessment
says.

After years of excusing rumours of Pakistani involvement as being the work
of rogue agents or retired intelligence officials acting on their own,
Western leaders have become increasingly blunt with Pakistan in private
conversations about the ISI's role in the Afghan war.

Admiral Michael Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, visited
Pakistan this month and confronted his counterparts in a meeting that one
diplomat described as stormy. "He lost his temper," the diplomat said.

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister David Emerson, who made a whirlwind visit
to Kabul on the weekend, was more measured when a reporter asked him about
relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"Canada does have concerns about the insurgency platform, if you like, that
is developing and has developed in the border regions between Afghanistan
and Pakistan," Mr. Emerson said. 

" ...We believe that ultimately there has to be a collaborative approach to
solving the situation between Afghanistan and Pakistan, and look forward to
dialogue taking place in the months ahead." 

Pakistan's intelligence services are widely believed to have helped create
the Taliban in 1994 and to have shepherded the movement toward its takeover
of nearly all of Afghanistan. Pakistan formally cut ties with the Taliban in
2001, under U.S. pressure, but rumours of assistance received by Taliban
insurgents in the lawless border region have persisted for years.

Mr. Alexander said the message to Pakistan must go beyond pressing the
government. Concrete actions should be demanded against the networks of
terrorists and insurgents who take shelter in the country's tribal areas, he
said. 

But assurances must also be given to Pakistan that moving against militants
in the border regions will not harm its own national interest, he said,
alluding to Pakistan's concerns about India. Members of the military
establishment in Pakistan have argued that supporting Islamic militants can
give their country a supply of irregular forces if needed against India, and
prevent Pakistan from being squeezed on two fronts in the event of war.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to