["a reasonable period of time" - this could mean anything. in other 
words: traveling to the US is completely senseless should one plan to 
use one's own equipment there... dm+]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/01/AR2008080103030.html

Travelers' Laptops May Be Detained At Border
No Suspicion Required Under DHS Policies

Federal agents may take a traveler's laptop computer or other electronic 
device to an off-site location for an unspecified period of time without 
any suspicion of wrongdoing, as part of border search policies the 
Department of Homeland Security recently disclosed.

Also, officials may share copies of the laptop's contents with other 
agencies and private entities for language translation, data decryption 
or other reasons, according to the policies, dated July 16 and issued by 
two DHS agencies, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"The policies . . . are truly alarming," said Sen. Russell Feingold 
(D-Wis.), who is probing the government's border search practices. He 
said he intends to introduce legislation soon that would require 
reasonable suspicion for border searches, as well as prohibit profiling 
on race, religion or national origin.

DHS officials said the newly disclosed policies -- which apply to anyone 
entering the country, including U.S. citizens -- are reasonable and 
necessary to prevent terrorism. Officials said such procedures have long 
been in place but were disclosed last month because of public interest 
in the matter.

Civil liberties and business travel groups have pressed the government 
to disclose its procedures as an increasing number of international 
travelers have reported that their laptops, cellphones and other digital 
devices had been taken -- for months, in at least one case -- and their 
contents examined.

The policies state that officers may "detain" laptops "for a reasonable 
period of time" to "review and analyze information." This may take place 
"absent individualized suspicion."

The policies cover "any device capable of storing information in digital 
or analog form," including hard drives, flash drives, cellphones, iPods, 
pagers, beepers, and video and audio tapes. They also cover "all papers 
and other written documentation," including books, pamphlets and 
"written materials commonly referred to as 'pocket trash' or 'pocket 
litter.' "

Reasonable measures must be taken to protect business information and 
attorney-client privileged material, the policies say, but there is no 
specific mention of the handling of personal data such as medical and 
financial records.

When a review is completed and no probable cause exists to keep the 
information, any copies of the data must be destroyed. Copies sent to 
non-federal entities must be returned to DHS. But the documents specify 
that there is no limitation on authorities keeping written notes or 
reports about the materials.

"They're saying they can rifle through all the information in a 
traveler's laptop without having a smidgen of evidence that the traveler 
is breaking the law," said Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for 
Democracy and Technology. Notably, he said, the policies "don't 
establish any criteria for whose computer can be searched."

Customs Deputy Commissioner Jayson P. Ahern said the efforts "do not 
infringe on Americans' privacy." In a statement submitted to Feingold 
for a June hearing on the issue, he noted that the executive branch has 
long had "plenary authority to conduct routine searches and seizures at 
the border without probable cause or a warrant" to prevent drugs and 
other contraband from entering the country.

Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff wrote in an opinion piece 
published last month in USA Today that "the most dangerous contraband is 
often contained in laptop computers or other electronic devices." 
Searches have uncovered "violent jihadist materials" as well as images 
of child pornography, he wrote.

With about 400 million travelers entering the country each year, "as a 
practical matter, travelers only go to secondary [for a more thorough 
examination] when there is some level of suspicion," Chertoff wrote. 
"Yet legislation locking in a particular standard for searches would 
have a dangerous, chilling effect as officers' often split-second 
assessments are second-guessed."

In April, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco 
upheld the government's power to conduct searches of an international 
traveler's laptop without suspicion of wrongdoing. The Customs policy 
can be viewed at: 
http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/travel/admissability/search_authority.ctt/search_authority.pdf.
 


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to