http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/04/AR2008080401
822.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
 
Solzhenitsyn: 'Spiritual Death Has... Touched Us All'


RePosted
Tuesday, August 5, 2008; 12:00 AM


The Post first printed this essay by Alexander Solzhenitsyn on Feb. 18,
1974. Solzhenitsyn's original was dated Feb. 12, the day he was arrested by
secret police. 

Live Not By Lies 

By Alexander Solzhenitsyn

At one time we dared not even to whisper. Now we write and read samizdat,
and sometimes when we gather in the smoking room at the Science Institute we
complain frankly to one another: What kind of tricks are they playing on us,
and where are they dragging us? Gratuitous boasting of cosmic achievements
while there is poverty and destruction at home. Propping up remote,
uncivilized regimes. Fanning up civil war. And we recklessly fostered Mao
Tse-tung at our expense -- and it will be we who are sent to war against
him, and will have to go. Is there any way out? And they put on trial
anybody they want, and they put sane people in asylums -- always they, and
we are powerless. 

Things have almost reached rock bottom. A universal spiritual death has
already touched us all, and physical death will soon flare up and consume us
both and our children -- but as before we still smile in a cowardly way and
mumble without tongues tied. But what can we do to stop it? We haven't the
strength. 

We have been so hopelessly dehumanized that for today's modest ration of
food we are willing to abandon all our principles, our souls, and all the
efforts of our predecessors and all the opportunities for our descendants --
but just don't disturb our fragile existence. We lack staunchness, pride and
enthusiasm. We don't even fear universal nuclear death, and we don't fear a
third world war. We have already taken refuge in the crevices. We just fear
acts of civil courage. 

We fear only to lag behind the herd and to take a step alone -- and suddenly
find ourselves without white bread, without heating gas and without a Moscow
registration. 

We have been indoctrinated in political courses, and in just the same way
was fostered the idea to live comfortably, and all will be well for the rest
of our lives: You can't escape your environment and social conditions.
Everyday life defines consciousness. What does it have to do with us? We
can't do anything about it. 

But we can -- everything. But we lie to ourselves for assurance. And it is
not they who are to blame for everything -- we ourselves, only we. One can
object: But actually you can think anything you like. Gags have been stuffed
into our mouths. Nobody wants to listen to us, and nobody asks us. How can
we force them to listen? It is impossible to change their minds. 

It would be natural to vote them out of office -- but there are not
elections in our country. In the West people know about strikes and protest
demonstrations -- but we are too oppressed, and it is a horrible prospect
for us: How can one suddenly renounce a job and take to the streets? Yet the
other fatal paths probed during the past century by our bitter Russian
history are, nevertheless, not for us, and truly we don't need them. 

Now that the axes have done their work, when everything which was sown has
sprouted anew, we can see that the young and presumptuous people who thought
they would make out country just and happy through terror, bloody rebellion
and civil war were themselves misled. No thanks, fathers of education! Now
we know that infamous methods breed infamous results. Let our hands be
clean! 

The circle -- is it closed? And is there really no way out? And is there
only one thing left for us to do, to wait without taking action? Maybe
something will happen by itself? It will never happen as long as we daily
acknowledge, extol, and strengthen -- and do not sever ourselves from -- the
most perceptible of its aspects: Lies. 

When violence intrudes into peaceful life, its face glows with
self-confidence, as if it were carrying a banner and shouting: "I am
violence. Run away, make way for me -- I will crush you." But violence
quickly grows old. And it has lost confidence in itself, and in order to
maintain a respectable face it summons falsehood as its ally -- since
violence can conceal itself with nothing except lies, and the lies can be
maintained only by violence. And violence lays its ponderous paw not every
day and not on every shoulder. It demands from us only obedience to lies and
daily participation in lies -- all loyalty lies in that. 

And the simplest and most accessible key to our self-neglected liberation
lies right here: Personal non-participation in lies. Though lies conceal
everything, though lies embrace everything, we will be obstinate in this
smallest of matters: Let them embrace everything, but not with any help from
me. 

This opens a breach in the imaginary encirclement caused by our inaction. It
is the easiest thing to do for us, but the most devastating for the lies.
Because when people renounce lies it simply cuts short their existence. Like
an infection, they can exist only in a living organism. 

We do not exhort ourselves. We have not sufficiently matured to march into
the squares and shout the truth out loud or to express aloud what we think.
It's not necessary. 

It's dangerous. But let us refuse to say that which we do not think.

This is our path, the easiest and most accessible one, which takes into
account our inherent cowardice, already well rooted. And it is much easier
-- it's dangerous even to say this -- than the sort of civil disobedience
which Gandhi advocated. 

Our path is not to give conscious support to lies about anything whatsoever!
And once we realize where lie the perimeters of falsehood ¿ each sees them
in his own way. 

Our path is to walk away from the gangrenous boundary. If we did not paste
together the dead bones and scales of ideology, if we did not sew together
the rotting rags, we would be astonished how quickly the lies would be
rendered helpless and subside. 

That which should be naked would then really appear naked before the whole
world. 

So in our timidity, let each of us make a choice: Whether consciously, to
remain a servant of falsehood -- of course, it is not out of inclination,
but to feed one's family, that one raises his children in the spirit of lies
-- or to shrug off the lies and become an honest man worthy of respect both
by one's children and contemporaries. 

And from that day onward he: 

• Will not henceforth write, sign, or print in any way a single phrase which
in his opinion distorts the truth. 

¿ Will utter such a phrase neither in private conversation nor in the
presence of many people, neither on his own behalf nor at the prompting of
someone else, neither in the role of agitator, teacher, educator, nor in a
theatrical role. 

¿ Will not depict, foster or broadcast a single idea which he can see is
false or a distortion of the truth, whether it be in painting, sculpture,
photography, technical science or music. 

¿ Will not cite out of context, either orally or written, a single quotation
so as to please someone, to feather his own nest, to achieve success in his
work, if he does not share completely the idea which is quoted, or if it
does not accurately reflect the matter at issue. 

¿ Will not allow himself to be compelled to attend demonstrations or
meetings if they are contrary to his desire or will, will neither take into
hand nor raise into the air a poster or slogan which he does not completely
accept. 

¿ Will not raise his hand to vote for a proposal with which he does not
sincerely sympathize, will vote neither openly nor secretly for a person
whom he considers unworthy or of doubtful abilities. 

¿ Will not allow himself to be dragged to a meeting where there can be
expected a forced or distorted discussion of a question. 

¿ Will immediately walk out of a meeting, session, lecture, performance or
film showing if he hears a speaker tell lies, or purvey ideological nonsense
or shameless propaganda. 

¿ Will not subscribe to or buy a newspaper or magazine in which information
is distorted and primary facts are concealed. 

Of course, we have not listed all of the possible and necessary deviations
from falsehood. But a person who purifies himself will easily distinguish
other instances with his purified outlook. 

No, it will not be the same for everybody at first. Some, at first, will
lose their jobs. For young people who want to live with truth, this will, in
the beginning, complicate their young lives very much, because the required
recitations are stuffed with lies, and it is necessary to make a choice. 

But there are no loopholes for anybody who wants to be honest: On any given
day any one of us will be confronted with at least one of the
above-mentioned choices even in the most secure of the technical sciences.
Either truth or falsehood: Toward spiritual independence, or toward
spiritual servitude. 

And he who is not sufficiently courageous even to defend his soul -- don't
let him be proud of his "progressive" views, and don't let him boast that he
is an academician or a people's artist, a merited figure, or a general --let
him say to himself: I am in the herd, and a coward. It's all the same to me
as long as I'm fed and warm. 

Even this path, which is the most modest of all paths of resistance, will
not be easy for us. But it is much easier than self-immolation or a hunger
strike: The flames will not envelope your body, your eyeballs, will not
burst from the heat, and brown bread and clean water will always be
available to your family. 

A great people of Europe, the Czhechoslovaks, whom we betrayed and deceived:
Haven't they shown us how a vulnerable breast can stand up even against
tanks if there is a worthy heart within it? 

You say it will not be easy? But it will be easiest of all possible
resources. It will not be an easy choice for a body, but it is only one for
a soul. No, it is not an easy path. But there are already people, even
dozens of them, who over the years have maintained all these points and live
by the truth. 

So you will not be the first to take this path, but will join those who have
already taken it. This path will be easier and shorter for all of us if we
take it by mutual efforts and in close rank. If there are thousands of us,
they will not be able to do anything with us. If there are tens of thousands
of us, then we would not even recognize our country. 

If we are too frightened, then we should stop complaining that someone is
suffocating us. We ourselves are doing it. Let us then bow down even more,
let us wait, and our brothers the biologists will help to bring nearer the
day when they are able to read our thoughts are worthless and hopeless. 

And if we get cold feet, even taking this step, then we are worthless and
hopeless, and the scorn of Pushkin should be directed to us: 

"Why should cattle have the gifts of freedom? 

"Their heritage from generation to generation is the belled yoke and the
lash."



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to