>From The Times

August 18, 2008

Dave 'Mudcat' Saunders: Barack Obama's elitist campaign alienates South

undefined

Tom Baldwin in Washington and Matt Spence in Roanoke 

The sea of shining, hope-filled faces that routinely flood Barack Obama's
rallies would be an alien environment for the grizzled features and
tobacco-stained temperament of Dave "Mudcat" Saunders. 

His preferred habitat is up a tree gunning down deer or on the mud flats -
which lent him their name - catching catfish, part of an endless struggle
with Appalachian wildlife. 

Along with his Confederate flag bedspread, the stag heads on his walls, his
preference for profanity over punctuation, he would horrify what he calls
the "northeastern elitist, Metropolitan Opera wing of the Democrats". 

But, as one of the party's few (some say only) rural strategists, this might
just be part of Mr Obama's problem. 

"The Democrats talk of tolerance, but in reality the only tolerance they
ever exhibit is for their own intellectual arrogance - and they don't have
tolerance for my culture," says Mudcat. "They think we're a bunch of
hillbilly heathens who go out and burn crosses and do crazy bullshit. 

"They don't give a f*** if we're with them or not, because it doesn't
matter. The f***ing Republicans have stolen the individual liberties thing
and that's why the gun thing is such a big deal." 

After a summer marked by soaring hyperbole about electing America's first
black President, the sweep of Obama-mania across Europe and a generally
feeble Republican campaign, Mr Obama's poll lead has evaporated. Many white,
rural and working-class voters are stubbornly refusing to share the
excitement about Mr Obama. 

Yesterday The New York Times carried a front-page article in which more than
a dozen senior Democrats urged Mr Obama to climb down from his sermonising
mount and tell ordinary voters how he would improve their lives. 

Nowhere does he have a bigger problem than in the Appalachians, a vast,
rugged, mountain region. It was here, in states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania,
West Virginia and Kentucky that Mr Obama was beaten badly by Hillary Clinton
- and his strategy towards them has altered little since. 

Although Mr Obama won Virginia and has since identified it as a prime target
in November's general election, Mudcat cautions that Democrats cannot rely
on urban liberals and African Americans in the north of the state. 

He describes his hometown of Roanoke as "a trading post, like Tombstone",
belonging to a different culture west of the Blue Ridge mountains of which
Mr Obama has no more understanding than Al Gore and John Kerry before him -
who lost the rural vote by 16 and 19 per cent respectively. 

Mudcat has previously helped both Mark Warner, the former Governor, and
Senator Jim Webb win in traditionally Republican-leaning Virginia. He was
also a senior strategist on the failed presidential campaign of John
Edwards, a close friend. 

Has he been asked to help Mr Obama? "I got a call from them right after
Johnny got out. I never heard back." What does he think of the Illinois
senator's campaign? Mudcat pauses and lights another Camel. 

"Sometimes they remind me of another bunch from Chicago, the Blues Brothers:
they seem to think they're on a mission from God." 

He is scathing about the reliance on registering new voters. "If that's how
he runs his campaign, he is going to lose. I'd rather bet on those who voted
before. When he stands up and says that I'm gonna get 30 per cent more black
voters - I'm gonna get 30 per cent more of my people to turn out for me -
what is Joe Six-Pack thinking?" 

Mudcat suggests that John McCain could win Michigan while holding Ohio and
Florida. And, unless Mr Obama changes course, "he ain't gonna win Virgina
either". 

"Instead of all the high-falutin' exhortation about listening to the better
angels, Mr Obama has gotta come out here - and time is short - and emphasise
social justice. 

"He should say, 'I'm a black guy. I'm not gonna take the Michael Jackson
treatment, but the problems of South Side Chicago are the same problems of
the Appalachian mountains'. Big sonsofabitches are kicking the little
sonsofabitches in the ass. Now I'm one of the little sonsofabitches, so I'm
pissed off. Inside every rural Republican is a rural Democrat begging to get
out. But we always trip over our johnsons." 

"The campaign," he says scornfully, "think this election will be won on the
internet. But here, at 5.30 in the afternoon, they don't go on the goddamn
internet, they go watch The Andy Griffith Show [a 1960s sitcom]." 

The nominee's difficulties are not about the colour of his skin but the tin
in his ear. "White people in the South and throughout the Appalachians love
black culture. I mean, Southern-style cooking is black food. Everything I
eat is fried. Your swing vote in the Appalachians comes down to common-sense
thinking people who have strong faith, and what Barack Obama needs to do is
embrace his culture. Because we like his culture. But nobody knows anything
about him; over 10 per cent of the rednecks out here - and I'm a redneck -
think he's a Muslim 'cause nobody's ever told 'em any different." 

His own Appalachian method of persuasion is best summed up in his campaign
against a constitutional amendment forbidding gay marriage in Virginia. "I'm
pretty sure I ain't a queer. And I've never had queer thoughts," he told a
newspaper, "but God loves them queers every bit that he loves the
Republicans." Or, as he says these days: "It's their mouth, they can use it
to haul coal if they want to." 

The Confederate bedspread is a tribute to "the gallant kids from around here
who lost their lives" - not a racist symbol, says Mudcat, adding that he has
no doubt "the right side won" the American Civil War. 

He says a "cultural wedge" has been placed between Democrats and Scots-Irish
voters just as Hadrian built a wall to keep them back in Britain. "It is the
same exact people. It's the same f***ing bunch of fight, sing, drink, pray
people who are over there who are over here in these mountains." 

And the Democrats are on the wrong side of it? "You're damn right. They're
on Hadrian's side of the wall is where they are. And they want the
Scots-Irish vote. Well it's true. It's f***ing genes. It's who we are as a
people. We'll say 'f*** you' to Bush, Longshanks or Maggie Thatcher. F***
any of 'em." 

History and votes

1865

After the American Civil War, Democrats dominated the 11 Southern, former
Confederate states because of their opposition to Lincoln's Republican
Party, which had led the Northern states 

1880-1960

The Southern states, known as the "Solid South", voted Democrat in every US
election, with the exception of 1928 

1960s

The Democrats' hold on the South slipped, partly because of the Civil Rights
Acts of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed segregation,
creating a sense of betrayal among Southerners 

Republicans adopted a "Southern strategy" of fielding candidates that would
appeal to the states' conservative sensibilities 

1980-2004 

The Republican presidential nominee has averaged 54 per cent of the popular
vote in the South, and the Democratic nominee only 42 per cent 

Sources:  <http://www.pbs.org/> www.pbs.org;  <http://www.answers.com/>
www.answers.com

.
 
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=11648958/grpspId=1705447214/msgI
d=69677/stime=1219021154/nc1=3848627/nc2=3848641/nc3=4763762> 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to