What Lurks in the Ayers-Annenberg Files?

The panicked reaction of the Obama campaign suggests they hold very damaging
information.

  <http://pajamasmedia.com/files/2008/08/ayers1.jpg> 

August 29, 2008 - by  <http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/author/claricefeldman/>
Clarice Feldman 
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/what-lurks-in-the-ayers-annenberg-files/
Do Democratic presidential campaign committees think we are all stupid or do
they suffer from some sort of group delusion? In 2004 they tried to peddle a
man who made claims about his military career that were easily proven to be
lies (Christmas in Cambodia, outrageous charges about war crimes by his
fellow soldiers) as a war hero “reporting for duty.”

This time around they are trying to take a man whose entire career has
linked him with far-left anti-American characters, political agendas focused
on redistribution of wealth, and racial spoils and pawn him off on us as a
man who transcends race and partisanship.

As the façade’s cracks begin to show through — largely outside the focus of
the major media — the Obama camp is behaving badly and thereby telegraphing
that the charges involving Obama’s role in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge
(CAC) are not only true, but both unanswerable and exceedingly damaging to
the campaign’s make-believe narrative about their candidate.

First, someone — still unknown but undoubtedly linked to the Chicago
Annenberg Challenge as an executive or board member during the time Obama
was its chairman — tried to prevent the University of Illinois’ Richard J.
Daley library from making available to writer Stanley Kurtz the
organization’s records.

Then the campaign falsely asserted that
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNkclbvuc9w> ads respecting the CAC and
Obama’s links to Ayers through it had been made by McCain, sent threatening
letters to stations brave enough to carry the ad, and topped it off with two
letters to the Department of Justice
<http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/08/021330.php> laughably
demanding a full investigation into the organization which sponsored the
ads, a 501(c)(4) organization
<http://michellemalkin.com/2008/08/26/fighting-back-against-obamas-thugs/>
legally permitted to engage in such activities.

Wednesday night the campaign conducted an outrageous and preposterous “
<http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0808/Obama_camp_blasts_National_Revi
ew_writer_as_slimy_character_assassin.html?showall> swarm” of Chicago radio
station WGN, the mild and moderate radio host Milt Rosenberg, and the
equally temperate guest of his show, Stanley Kurtz.

Kurtz, in Chicago to review the 1,000 CAC files the university library
relented and allowed him to see, was asked to
<http://wgnradio.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=44075&Itemid=
467> discuss the matter with host Rosenberg. The Obama camp was invited to
send a representative and refused to do so although the headquarters is but
four blocks away. Instead the campaign organized a swarm of non-stop callers
to WGN attacking Kurtz as a “vicious racist” a “slimy character assassin”
and suggesting WGN failed its obligations as a broadcaster by allowing him
to publicly air his views. The baseless charges and the vitriolic nature of
them were startling to the station, the host, and the guest. Except for
telling outright lies about the Ayers connection and the CAC, the campaign
has done everything in its power to show us that it does not believe there
is a free speech right to examine Obama’s record — such of it as has not
been buried or “lost.” The unexamined life of Barack is what they prefer we
vote on.

In any event, despite these objectionable tactics Kurtz was able to tell us
a bit about what he found in the first few days of the five-day window he’s
been given to study the CAC files.

He reiterated what I’ve said earlier: CAC seems to have gone through $110
million to fund an educational program which two assessments — one by the
Annenberg Foundation and one by an outside team — both found had
accomplished nothing for the public school children of Chicago. It is still
unclear how and why Obama was made chair of the CAC, but so far it seems
that former Weathermen bomb-maker and leader Bill Ayers picked him for the
slot.

In any event, contrary to Obama’s early efforts to brush off his
relationship with Ayers through a series of false claims, Ayers applied for
and got the CAC grant, was chair of the other collaborative group that
closely worked with CAC, was present at board meetings and retreats with
Obama, and was considered an “ex officio” member of CAC’s board.

The CAC files show the organization funneled money to activist organizations
and did so on ideological grounds, favoring applications that focused on
ethnic identity and bilingual education and turning down grant proposals
which did not. Thus, CAC funded a Juneteenth effort by the South Shore
African Village Collaboration and a peace school but rejected proposals by
the Chicago Algebra Project aimed at increasing student achievement and the
District 5 Math Science Initiative which was trying to increase the math and
science competence of Hispanic youngsters.

Kurtz added that Obama’s pre-CAC organizing work for the Gamaliel Foundation
was for a group whose views were remarkably like Obama’s “spiritual mentor”
Rev. Wright’s anti-American liberation philosophy. He recommended the book
Doing Justice: Congregation and Communities, by Dennis Jacobsen, which he
described in an NRO article “Senator Stealth.” Notable is not only the views
of this organization but that like all organizing groups founded on the work
of Saul Alinsky, the organizers were practiced at hiding their extreme
leftist views, a tactic considered essential to gain credence with the
groups they were working with. He also noted that these racial spoils
schemes and redistributionist views were utterly consistent with all the
positions Obama took as a state senator.

While Obama’s camp is trying to suggest that his critics are linking him to
Ayers’
<http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODk2ZTRmZDIwNWEzOWE2MDNhMTQ0ZWYwYm
RiNWZmNDM> conduct in the 1960s, in fact, we are talking about the views and
conduct of both these men — now clearly established as
<http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=304729375940845> close
allies, not passing acquaintances in the Hyde Park neighborhood they both
inhabit — in the 1990s, along with the utter failure of the generously
funded program to help inner-city Chicago school children they managed into
the ground.

Two more points in passing:

1) We are talking about other people’s children, not Ayers’ or Obama’s. At
one point the Obama campaign disingenuously said their children went to the
same school, implying it was at the same time. Ayers is considerably older
than Obama and so are his children who attended the private Lab School of
Chicago years before the Obama children did. Obviously neither of these men
considered their dream world’s little red schoolhouses for their own
offspring.

2) Take a close gander at the draft Democrat platform. It is full of plans
to bring community organizers to your own neighborhood — undoubtedly
offering us all the chance to watch more money wasted on programs and people
unable to improve public school academic performance.

Oh well, if that fails, maybe we can just all enroll our kids at the Lab
School.

 
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with
"Fair Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976.
The principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The
Copyright Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain
permission or pay royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials
if the purposes of display include "criticism, comment, news reporting,
teaching, scholarship, and research." Section 107 establishes four criteria
for determining whether the use of a work in any particular case qualifies
as a "fair use". A work used does not necessarily have to satisfy all four
criteria to qualify as an instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is
determined by the overall extent to which the cited work does or does not
substantially satisfy the criteria in their totality. If you wish to use
copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you
must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml>
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to