<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122099204692716155.html?mod=djemEditorialPa
ge>
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122099204692716155.html?mod=djemEditorialPag
e 
 

Criminalizing Criticism of Islam

By ELIZABETH SAMSON 
FROM TODAY'S WALL STREET JOURNAL EUROPE
September 10, 2008


There are strange happenings in the world of international jurisprudence
that do not bode well for the future of free speech. In an unprecedented
case, a Jordanian court is prosecuting 12 Europeans in an extraterritorial
attempt to silence the debate on radical Islam.

The prosecutor general in Amman charged the 12 with blasphemy, demeaning
Islam and Muslim feelings, and slandering and insulting the prophet Muhammad
in violation of the Jordanian Penal Code. The charges are especially unusual
because the alleged violations were not committed on Jordanian soil.

Among the defendants is the Danish cartoonist whose alleged crime was to
draw in 2005 one of the Muhammad illustrations that instigators then used to
spark Muslim riots around the world. His co-defendants include 10 editors of
Danish newspapers that published the images. The 12th accused man is Dutch
parliamentarian Geert Wilders, who supposedly broke Jordanian law by
releasing on the Web his recent film, "Fitna," which tries to examine how
the Quran inspires Islamic terrorism.

Jordan's attempt at criminalizing free speech beyond its own borders
wouldn't be so serious if it were an isolated case. Unfortunately, it is
part of a larger campaign to use the law and international forums to
intimidate critics of militant Islam. For instance, in December the United
Nations General Assembly passed the Resolution on Combating Defamation of
Religions; the only religion mentioned by name was Islam. While such
resolutions aren't legally binding, national governments sometimes cite them
as justification for legislation or other actions.

More worrying, the U.N. Human Rights Council in June said it would refrain
from condemning human-rights abuses related to "a particular religion." The
ban applies to all religions, but it was prompted by Muslim countries that
complained about linking Islamic law, Shariah, to such outrages as female
genital mutilation and death by stoning for adulterers. This kind of
self-censorship could prove dangerous for people suffering abuse, and it
follows the council's March decision to have its expert on free speech
investigate individuals and the media for negative comments about Islam.

Given this trend, it's worth taking a closer look at the Jordanian case.

The prosecutor is relying on a 2006 amendment to the Jordanian Justice Act
that casts a worryingly wide net for such prosecution. Passed in response to
the Danish cartoons incident, the law allows the prosecution of individuals
whose actions affect the Jordanian people by "electronic means," such as the
Internet. The 2006 amendment, in theory, means anyone who publishes on the
Internet could be subject to prosecution in Jordan. If the case against the
12 defendants is allowed to go forward, they will be the first but probably
not the last Westerners to be hit by Jordan's law.

Amman has already requested that Interpol apprehend Mr. Wilders and the
Danes and bring them to stand before its court for an act that is not a
crime in their home countries. To the contrary. Dutch prosecutors said in
July that although some of Mr. Wilders's statements may be offensive, they
are protected under Dutch free-speech legislation. Likewise, Danish law
protects the rights of the Danish cartoonists and newspapers to express
their views.

Neither Denmark nor the Netherlands will turn over its citizens to Interpol,
as the premise of Jordan's extradition request is an affront to the very
principles that define democracies. It is thus unlikely that any Western
country would do so, either. But there is no guarantee for the defendants'
protection if they travel to countries that are more sympathetic to the
Jordanian court.

Unless democratic countries stand up to this challenge to free speech, other
nations may be emboldened to follow the Jordanian example. Kangaroo courts
across the globe will be ready to charge free people with obscure violations
of other societies' norms and customs, and send Interpol to bring them to
stand trial in frivolous litigation.

A new form of forum shopping would soon take root. Activists would be able
to choose countries whose laws and policies are informed by their religious
values to prosecute critical voices in other countries. The case before the
Jordanian court is not just about Mr. Wilders and the Danes. It is about the
subjugation of Western standards of free speech to fear and coercion by
foreign courts.

Ms. Samson, an attorney specializing in international and constitutional
law, will join the Hudson Institute this fall.

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to