Muslims are so stupid.

b

To Ban a Book


by Winfield Myers
FrontPageMagazine.com
December 3, 2008

http://www.meforum.org/article/2018 <http://www.meforum.org/article/2018> 


Political correctness is at its most parodic precisely when it seems beyond
parody. The latest bit of history to support this adage is the Middle East
studies establishment's reception of Sherry Jones's novel The Jewel of
Medina (Jewel), a life of Aisha, the favorite wife of Muhammad. As Robert
Spencer writes in his review of Jewel for the Winter 2009 issue of the
Middle East Quarterly , Jones set out to "be a bridge-builder" who chose her
historical sources selectively to ensure that her work would present a
flattering picture of her subjects.

Enter Denise Spellberg , who teaches Islamic history at the University of
Texas. She heard of Jewel pre-publication because Jones, in her naiveté,
asked her then-publisher Ballantine, an imprint of Random House, to obtain
an endorsement from Spellberg to splay across the back of the dust jacket.
Spellberg is author of Politics, Gender, and the Islamic Past: The Legacy of
Aisha bint Abi Bakr , which Jones cites as one of her sources. She is, in
addition, a typical practitioner of the blatant bias toward things Muslim
and, more particularly, Arab that has become almost ubiquitous among
practitioners of Middle East studies. Put simply but accurately, this means
that things Arab/Muslim = good; things American/Western = bad. Under this
regime, dispassionate, fair-minded research that takes a critical look at
the Middle East is more likely to be rewarded with professional ostracism
than advancement.

The results of Spellberg's fantasy-laden reading of the publisher's galleys
of Jewel is by now familiar: she threw a Texas-sized tantrum and effectively
persuaded Random House (the publisher of her forthcoming Thomas Jefferson's
Qur'an) to withdraw publication of the book. According to the Wall Street
Journal , which broke the story, Spellberg made a "frantic" phone call to
Muslim friend Shahed Amanullah, who owns the popular site altmuslim. After
telling him the novel "made fun of Muslims and their history" and asking him
to sound the alarm, word spread rapidly that Random House was on the verge
of publishing a book on Islam that would spark worldwide violence akin to
what occurred in the aftermath of the publication of the Danish cartoons of
Muhammad and Salmon Rushdie's Satanic Verses.

Here is a sample <http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/5447>  of what
Spellberg has said about Jewel:

*       A very ugly, stupid piece of work. 
*       A declaration of war...explosive stuff...a national security issue. 
*       I don't have a problem with historical fiction. I do have a problem
with the deliberate misinterpretation of history. You can't play with a
sacred history and turn it into soft core pornography. 
*       (Via Jane Garrett of Random House): [Spellberg] thinks it will be
far more controversial than the satanic verses [sic] and the Danish
cartoons. Does not know if the author and Ballantine folks are clueless or
calculating, but thinks the book should be withdrawn ASAP. 

Compare those dire warnings to what Robert Spencer found in his reading:

        But whoever reads The Jewel of Medina, after suffering through
stilted Hollywood historical epic dialogue larded with Arabic tidbits for
authenticity's sake, will wonder what the fuss was all about. True to her
word, Jones offers a portrait of Muhammad that is so flattering as to be
worthy of British religion writer Karen Armstrong, who compared Muhammad to
Gandhi.

Jones, says Spencer, saves her harsh judgment for Muhammad's enemies:

        In keeping with this approach, Jones paints Muhammad's enemies with
lurid comic-book strokes as evil, treacherous, and repulsive. The Jews of
the Qaynuqa tribe, whom Muhammad eventually exiled, lurk sinisterly in
doorways and play evil pranks upon Muhammad's wives. Abu Sufyan, the Quraysh
leader who fought Muhammad and the Muslims in the battles of Badr, Uhud, and
the Trench, abducts and murders a friend of Aisha; Jones describes his sweat
glistening "like beads of grease in every fold and crease of fat" while his
accomplice's "pocked face seemed to writhe with hatred."

Spencer does find one instance in which, by having Aisha fall in love with
Safwan ibn al-Muattal and express initial disappointment at her marriage to
Muhammad, Jones ensures that "feathers will be ruffled." But enough to
justify violence? That, Spencer says, "is doubtful in the extreme."

Spencer's review further demonstrates that Spellberg's solicitousness of
things Muslim caused her to grossly overstate the risk involved in
publishing Jewel. The British publishing house Gibson Square Books canceled
publication  of the book in the UK after the home of its head was
firebombed. While it's impossible to say for sure that no violence would
have accompanied its publication in the UK had Spellberg never launched her
hysteria-laden campaign against the book, it's beyond dispute that Beaufort
Books in the U.S. went ahead with publication, and to date no violence has
occurred. Thanks to Robert Spencer's careful review, we can better
understand why: Jewel is more "soft history" than "soft pornography."

        


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to