'Islamophobia' or 'Truthophobia'?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122869182286886467.html

By MATTHIAS KüNTZEL | From today's Wall Street Journal Europe

At a time when Jew haters in the Islamic world have become more 
assertive than ever, Berlin's Center for Research on Anti-Semitism is 
concentrating on a different group: the "new enemies of Islam."

Who exactly belongs to this category is not clear from the center's 
latest publication, the "Yearbook for Research on Anti-Semitism." But 
the potential danger is supposedly known: "The fury of the new enemies 
of Islam is similar to the older rage of anti-Semites against the Jews," 
writes Prof. Wolfgang Benz, the institute's director. The center will 
present its new findings today at a conference in Berlin titled 
"Concepts of the Muslim Enemy -- Concepts of the Jewish Enemy."

It is certainly necessary to oppose the demonization of Muslims and 
discrimination against them, which often have racist motivations. The 
Berlin center, whose research covers prejudices in general, is right to 
address this issue. The problem lies in the way it is being done.

The Berlin center adopts the neologism "Islamophobia" without any 
reservation. This term is misleading because it mixes two different 
phenomena -- unjust hatred against Muslims and necessary criticism of 
political Islam -- and condemns both equally.

By accepting this vocabulary, the Berlin center reinforces an 
unfortunate trend. In May 2005, the Council of Europe -- at the urging 
of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan -- used the term for the 
first time, condemning "all forms of intolerance . . . including 
anti-Semitism and Islamophobia."

Yet this statement did not go far enough for the Muslim Council of 
Britain. "The fact is that Islamophobia has replaced anti-Semitism," 
explained Abduljalil Sajid, an imam and leading member of the Muslim 
Council, a month later at a conference of the Organization for Security 
and Cooperation in Europe in Cordoba, Spain. He described as 
Islamophobic such statements as "Long live Israel!" and "Muslim 
fundamentalism is dangerous." Meanwhile, various documents by the 
Organization of the Islamic Conference and the United Nations have 
condemned Islamophobia as today's most important and worst form of 
prejudice.

The Center for Research on Anti-Semitism does not go this far. It is, 
though, surprising how naturally this institution of all places puts 
anti-Muslim sentiments and anti-Semitism in the same category. While 
both forms of prejudice should be fought, the differences between the 
"concept of the Muslim enemy" and the "concept of the Jewish enemy" are 
evident.

First, while racism usually makes people "small" in order to enslave, 
exploit or expel them, anti-Semitism makes the Jews delusionally "big." 
The most important characteristic of anti-Semitism is a conspiracy 
theory that holds the Jews responsible for both capitalism and 
communism, for AIDS, revolutions and financial crises -- in short, for 
every "inexplicable" catastrophe of modernity.

The concept of "redemptive anti-Semitism," coined by Holocaust scholar 
Saul Friedländer, describes this phenomenon: If one assumes the Jews are 
responsible for all the world's misery, only their extermination can 
"redeem" the world. This paradigm of Jew hatred does not apply to 
racism. Muslims are not accused of pulling the strings behind all 
revolutions and wars.

Second, while we must reject any general suspicion of Muslims, it is 
impossible to ignore the fact that reservations about Muslims are based 
on real mass murder committed by some Muslims in the name of Islam. 
Events such as 9/11 or the murder of Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh have 
no counterpart in Jewish tradition.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often used to explain Muslim hatred 
of Jews. But Israel's policies are not causing anti-Semitism. Rather, 
the way those policies are distorted and demonized in the Muslim world, 
and increasingly in Europe, is a new expression of this old hatred.

Third, one need not play down the extent of discrimination against 
Muslims in Europe to recognize that the effects of the "concept of the 
Muslim enemy" and the "concept of the Jewish enemy" are qualitatively 
different. No one wants to erase a Muslim country from the map the way 
some people threaten to do with the Jewish state. Islamic centers and 
houses of prayer need no permanent police protection in Europe, unlike 
Jewish sites. No satellite stations call for the extermination of 
Muslims, whereas Hezbollah and Hamas TV, for example, broadcast via Arab 
satellites into European living rooms, regularly call for the 
destruction of the Jews -- even on children's programs.

In taking up the fashionable vocabulary of Islamophobia and equating 
hostility to Muslims with hostility to Jews, the center also risks 
undermining the most important current task in dealing with 
anti-Semitism: studying and fighting hostility to Jews in the Islamic 
world, where anti-Semitism has reached an unprecedented level.

For example, one of the authors in the latest Yearbook, Jochen Müller, 
proposes a "revision of politics and history teaching" in German 
schools. Because the Holocaust has no "central meaning for migrants from 
the Arabic-Muslim world," one should consider whether "the colonial 
period and its consequences" would not be a better subject for 
"appropriate 'Holocaust education'" among Muslim students in Germany. 
This is a remarkable idea given the degree of Holocaust denial among 
many young Muslims.

Another article in the Yearbook, "Hostility to Islam on the World Wide 
Web," goes even further. Instead of criticizing anti-Semitism among 
Muslims, the author criticizes those who accuse Muslims of 
anti-Semitism. That's because such accusations provide "an apparently 
rationally based argument for rejecting an entire collective," writes 
Yasemin Shooman, a staff member at the center. Here, attempts to fight 
"hostility to Islam" threaten to turn into tolerance of anti-Semitic 
attitudes.

While the Berlin center concentrates on world-wide "anti-Islamic 
resentments," its Yearbook says not a word about the anti-Semitism of 
the Iranian mullahs. Thus, it hardly does justice to the demands for 
contemporary research on anti-Semitism. Never before has the elimination 
of the Jewish state been so loudly propagated. Never before has an 
influential power made Holocaust denial the center of its foreign 
policy, as Iran has today. Never before has a U.N. forum been misused 
for an anti-Semitic speech, as it was on Sept. 23 by Iranian President 
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier 
criticized the speech as "blatantly anti-Semitic."

The Center for Research on Anti-Semitism, whose reports influence the 
work of the Bundestag, the federal government and the international 
community, should be expected to make anti-Semitism in the Middle East a 
focus of its work.

It is right that the past obligates us to combat all racism. But the 
experience of the Holocaust contains a second lesson: It obligates us to 
combat the temptation of "truthophobia" -- fear of the truth -- and to 
take literally the proclamations of anti-Semites, however crazy they may 
sound.

Mr. Küntzel is author of "Jihad and Jew Hatred" (Telos Press, 2007). 
Belinda Cooper translated this essay from the German.

------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to