26/11 attacks showed Pakistan 'broke its promise'

Aziz Haniffa in Washington, DC | December 15, 2008 | 09:07 IST




Former US Secretary of State General (Retd) Colin Powell has said that in the 
wake of the Mumbai terror attacks, Pakistan can no longer afford "to wink and 
nod" and pretend there are no terrorist groups operating within its borders 
that are a threat to the stability of the region.

Powell, who agreed that there were similarities between the Mumbai attacks and 
the attack in December 2001 when the Lashkar-e-Tayiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammad 
had launched attacks on the Indian Parliament, said at the time Islamabad had 
promised to completely eliminate and dismantle these terrorist networks, and 
was surprised to find that seven years later they were still very much alive 
and thriving.

Appearing on CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS program, Powell acknowledged that when he 
went to Pakistan in 2001, the Pakistani authorities said they were going to 
eliminate them (the LeT and JeM). 'They promised, and went about saying, 'See, 
they are not there anymore'.'

'Well, where did they go? Well, they are somewhere. They changed names and they 
changed forms,' he said of Pakistan's broken promise.

Powell said, 'Just the other day, the Pakistani government arrested a number of 
people and said they had raided seven camps. And, the question that immediately 
occurred to me -- why are there seven camps?'

'And, so, the Pakistanis have to make a strategic choice,' he argued, adding, 
'Both, a political choice and a military choice and a choice on the part of the 
Inter-Services Security apparatus that we can no longer pay the price of having 
this kind of terrorist organization, inside Pakistan; and, we can no longer 
wink and nod and pretend that it isn't there and they have to take them on.'

Powell warned that if Pakistan does not take these terrorist groups on and 
eliminate them once and for all, 'You will have these incidents over time and 
the situation will remain unstable.'

He reiterated, 'I would say to my Pakistani friends, don't let it happen again. 
Don't allow these kinds of organisations to exist in Pakistan-controlled 
Kashmir or anywhere else.' 

Powell bemoaned that the terror attacks had come at a time when there had been 
'a lot of progress' in�ties between India and Pakistan since 2001. 'I was very 
pleased to see, first, bus travel start, and then of cricket teams going back 
and forth -- that's how you sort of start to build confidence, and both nations 
have benefited from that.'

'So, I sense that as tragic as this four-day period was in Mumbai, both Indians 
and Pakistanis realise you cannot let these 10 murderers -- these 10 terrorists 
-- drive the policies of two countries where these policies have brought them 
some rapprochement and progress in recent years. So, let us get the emotion out 
of this, let us talk to one another and let us see if we can find all the 
perpetrators."

However, Powell was also apologetic for Pakistan, saying it has had its own 
political� turmoil in recent months and the situation boiling over from 
Afghanistan into the tribal areas had made it that much more difficult. 
'Pakistan has a new government -- a relatively new government -- that I don't 
think is yet completely secure in power.'

As a result, Powell argued that the United States and the international 
community have 'to be sensitive to that and we have got to help this new 
government'.

                

  _____  

URL for this article:
http://www.rediff.com//news/2008/dec/15mumterror-attacks-showed-pakistan-broke-its-promise.htm
 
(F)AIR USE NOTICE: All original content and/or articles and graphics in this 
message are copyrighted, unless specifically noted otherwise. All rights to 
these copyrighted items are reserved. Articles and graphics have been placed 
within for educational and discussion purposes only, in compliance with "Fair 
Use" criteria established in Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. The 
principle of "Fair Use" was established as law by Section 107 of The Copyright 
Act of 1976. "Fair Use" legally eliminates the need to obtain permission or pay 
royalties for the use of previously copyrighted materials if the purposes of 
display include "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and 
research." Section 107 establishes four criteria for determining whether the 
use of a work in any particular case qualifies as a "fair use". A work used 
does not necessarily have to satisfy all four criteria to qualify as an 
instance of "fair use". Rather, "fair use" is determined by the overall extent 
to which the cited work does or does not substantially satisfy the criteria in 
their totality. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes of your 
own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright 
owner. For more information go to:  
<http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml> 
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 

THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. COPYING AND DISSEMINATION IS 
PROHIBITED WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNERS.

 
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to