http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/015/927uxqry.a
sp
 
Lashkar-e-Taiba in America 
A convicted terror recruiter plays victim of the NSA. 
by Stephen Schwartz 
12/16/2008 12:00:00 AM 





The coincidence can best be described as macabre: The terrorist assault on
Mumbai occurred just as a House Select Intelligence Oversight Panel, headed
by Democratic Rep. Rush Holt of New Jersey, initiated an inquiry into the
conviction of a radical Muslim hatemonger, Ali Al-Timimi, for recruiting to
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LET) or Army of the Righteous, the group considered
responsible for the latest atrocities in India. Purportedly, Al-Timimi, when
he was tried, may have been a "victim" of anti-terror measures introduced by
the Bush administration. 

The review of the Al-Timimi case would be the Holt panel's first formal
action against the Bush administration's record in this field. The panel was
established last year by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. But let us take our own
look at the movements, incidents, and characters involved. Congressional and
media attitudes toward Islamist extremism are in fact more deserving of
criticism here than are Bush policies. 

LET is a powerful fundamentalist militia financed by the Pakistani
government in its fight with India over Kashmir. The group has a close
relationship with al Qaeda; prominent Guantánamo captive Abu Zubayda, a top
al Qaeda operative, was arrested in a LET safehouse in Pakistan in 2002. The
group is committed to terror in the West as well as in India, Pakistan, and
Afghanistan. Indeed LET is present wherever Pakistani radicals are found,
and was involved
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Publ
ic/Articles/000/000/012/565niapc.asp>  in the 2006 plot at Heathrow airport
that changed airline policies on passengers carrying liquids. 

Two years before the Heathrow affair, LET veteran Dhiren Barot, a Hindu
convert to Islam who graduated to al Qaeda, was arrested in Britain and
charged with planning a variety of chemical and radioactive attacks on
financial offices in the United States, which he had surveilled extensively.
Barot, heading a network of Kashmiri radical recruits, was sentenced to life
imprisonment in the UK. LET's other exploits outside the Indian subcontinent
included the training of "shoe bomber" Richard Reid, currently serving a
life sentence in the U.S.

But one of the most notable setbacks suffered by LET involved the so-called
"Virginia paintball jihad" case. Notwithstanding the light-hearted nickname
bestowed on the conspiracy by media, the "paintball jihad" was much more
than a weekend diversion involving a paramilitary sport. The Virginia group
of Islamists, including American Muslim convert Randall "Ismail" Royer, was
convicted of training for and participating in LET's military campaign
against India. From his base in the United States, Royer sent recruits to an
LET camp in Pakistan for instruction in the use of small arms,
rocket-propelled grenades, and other military resources. Royer admitted he
had formed his group within a week of the horrors of September 11, 2001, to
swell the ranks of mujahideen fighting against the U.S.-led coalition in
Afghanistan. In practice, however, the paintball convicts fired their
weapons against Indian forces in Kashmir. Royer was sent to prison for 20
years, and eight of his cohort received similar sentences.

And thus to the present contretemps. Al-Timimi, a Washington, D.C.-born
biologist when he was not engaged in inciting violence, was convicted in the
Virginia case of soliciting participation in LET's armed jihad. Indeed, he
was the Royer group's "spiritual mentor." Al-Timimi was a prominent figure
in Washington jihadist circles; he delivered Friday sermons at the Saudi-run
Washington Islamic Center, the "big mosque" dedicated to the cult of
Wahhabism (see "The Mosque and the Imam
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Publ
ic/Articles/000/000/015/850orgbk.asp> "). 

In the Virginia circle, Al-Timimi directed his exhortations against India,
and there is an undeniable link between his da'wa, or Islamic outreach, and
the carnage in Mumbai. Al-Timimi had spoken by telephone with Suliman
Al-Buthe, a Saudi subject born in Egypt and designated
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/js18
95.htm>  a terror financier by the U.S. Treasury. Al-Buthe was a high
official of the Saudi-based Al-Haramain Foundation, a major support network
for al Qaeda. Al-Timimi gloated to Al-Buthe about the crash of the space
shuttle Columbia, among other tasteful comments. Al-Timimi received a
sentence of life plus 70 years without parole. 

Critics of the Bush administration have homed in on the Al-Timimi case as an
alleged example of U.S. legal misconduct in pursuit of terrorist suspects.
Al-Timimi challenged his conviction because use of National Security Agency
electronic surveillance against him had not been fully disclosed in his
trial. "Domestic spying," at least at this point, apparently trumps
"international plotting of mass murder" as a matter for congressional
scrutiny. 

The New York Times in mid-November identified
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/www.nytimes.com/2008/11/18/washingt
on/18nsa.html?ref=us>  the Al-Timimi case as an "early test" for
President-elect Barack Obama, regarding whether he will continue
surveillance of well-known extremists (since Al-Timimi hardly concealed his
views) or discontinue it. Between the consequences at Mumbai and the
posturing of his fellow-politicians, Obama indeed faces a test. But the
campaign against NSA and related law-enforcement activities in cases like
that of Al-Timimi has nothing to do with maintaining American justice as a
pristine example for the world, nor with saving lives. Rather, it is a
purely political matter aimed at President Bush and seeking to discredit the
framework of anti-terror measures adopted during his tenure.

Smart money says Obama will recognize the greater threat and keep NSA and
related practices in place, if not extend them. But the Times has continued
its posturing on the Al-Timimi case
<http://www.weeklystandard.com/Utilities/www.nytimes.com/2008/12/08/washingt
on/08nsa.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Timimi&st=cse> , euphemistically describing him
as "a Muslim scholar" and offering a distinction between training for and
firing weapons in war against India, and "terrorist actions." According to
the Times's definition of terrorism, the Virginia group was innocent.
According to Al-Timimi, his attorneys, and the Times, his trial should be
treated as free speech case. 

The moral is clear: Rep. Holt and his panel should take a good, long look at
LET and its global activities, especially their consequences in Mumbai,
before rushing to the aid of Ali Al-Timimi, jihadist extraordinaire. 

Stephen Schwartz is a frequent contributor to THE WEEKLY STANDARD.

 
Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to