http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023953.php
 

December 16, 2008


Wafa Sultan: "Is it not a duty for each one of us to view Islam not
frivolously but in a most serious manner?"


 wafa_sultan.jpg <http://www.jihadwatch.org/wafa_sultan.jpg> 
One of the heroes of our age

When Colin Powell endorsed Obama in October, he went out of his way to
criticize those who were troubled by the idea of a Muslim President. Hugh
Fitzgerald explained what was wrong with Powell's analysis in his article
"Colin Powell  <http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023173.php> and Jihad: A
dereliction of duty." And now the heroic Wafa Sultan contributes some
observations of her own: "Contemplating Islam," by Wafa Sultan in Hudson New
York <http://www.hudsonny.org/2008/12/contemplating-islam.php> , December 15
(thanks to Pamela
<http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/powells-piety-c.htm
l> ):

If we consider the Islamic texts, their content and the devotion that so
many Muslims - including in America - attach to them; if we consider the
tragic upshot of these teachings in terms of our current world's security,
is it not a duty for each one of us to view Islam not frivolously but in a
most serious manner? 

There was an episode during the current Presidential election that greatly
disturbed me. It was former Secretary of State Colin Powell's interview on
"Meet the Press." For me this interview was a defining moment. He expressed
his displeasure at some of his colleagues' accusations that Obama might be a
Muslim, and stated: "And what if he is? Is there something wrong with being
a Muslim?"

Mr. Powell's admonition at others who dare questioning Muslims, or Islam and
its implications, in particular, people like me, who suffered immensely
precisely because there is "something wrong with being a Muslim," would
indeed be disheartened. If Powell doesn't understand what may be the dire
consequences for being a Muslim, then who should understand? The man, who
once held the post of American Secretary of State, asserts categorically
that there is nothing wrong with being a Muslim, even though the country he
led has been suffering immensely from Muslim terrorism and has paid a high
price because of it.

I appreciate that Powell, who has been nurtured by the American moral code,
refuses to judge people on the basis of their religious affiliation. That is
his right. But he does not have the right to nonchalantly disregard people's
apprehensions of Muslims, especially at those of us who have lived in Muslim
countries. We have risked our lives to escape from them, and are now risking
our lives again to speak up against the harm they cause, induced by Islamic
theology and culture.

In order to understand my perspective one would have to be a woman, living
in Syria, my birthplace, or any other Arab Muslim country.

Since immigrating to the United States more than five presidential elections
ago, I always regarded American politics as a luxury that did not concern
me. Living in the US was enough to satisfy me emotionally, physically and
intellectually. Anything beyond that was more than I required.

I came to regard America's might as much greater than any president that
happened to be in power - Democratic or Republican. Hence, I assumed that
any person, who attained the rank of presidential candidate, regardless of
party affiliation, was capable of safely leading this great nation. Because
of that, I never took the trouble to inquire which candidate was more worthy
of victory; for me it was a mere toss-up.

However, the events of September 11th, 2001 stripped away my confidence. I
began wondering how well Americans understand Political Islam - the
underlying cause of this and other heinous attacks and how willing are we to
probe into its ideology or comprehend its objectives. The events surrounding
the most recent election have increased my doubts and my concerns for this
country, which I love with all my heart.

So what is the problem? During and after the recent election, my fear for
America was that Obama's victory could breathe fresh life into the further
rise of Islamism, including Islamic terrorism.

Why?

Islamists' psychology is worlds apart from that of Westerners. They believe
in absolute terms in their divine mission to submit the world to Islam. They
are engaged in a constant search for divine meaning and inspiration - even
in mundane matters.

First, there was Senator Obama's Muslim background. It is well known that
Mr. Obama was born to a Muslim father, spent part of his early life in
Indonesia - a Muslim country - and attended a Muslim school there. Almost
every day my inbox was flooded with e-mail rumors about Obama which
reflected many American citizens' fears regarding the Democratic candidate's
Muslim background.

But Mr. Obama reassured us that he is a Christian and that was enough to
dispel the doubts I might have had about him being a Muslim. I let go of my
fear for America should Obama win. For now, I regained my confidence in him.

However, Salafists interpret even daily events in a way that may not
necessarily appear significant to Westerners. In this context some Islamists
go so far as viewing the Islamic background of Obama as a heaven-sent
confirmation of the first step in realizing the dream of submitting the West
to Islam. The mere fact that American president bears a Muslim name like
Hussein is enough to assure them that Islam is marching into America and has
already infiltrated the White House.

Once, I was browsing through a website in Arabic and came across a news item
announcing that the American actress Halle Berry gave birth to a daughter
whom she named Nahla; an Arabic name meaning "bee". I then read readers'
comments on this piece of news. A considerable number of them were jubilant,
since they regarded this report as a God's sign that Islam had begun to
advance into America, because the word nahla is mentioned in the Koran.

As for Mr. Powell, does he understand that Islam is not just a religion but
a political doctrine that seeks to impose itself on non-Muslims even by
force? If he does, why should people not be doubtful?

This is not an Islamophobic prejudice I present. Muslims, like any other
national group, can be either good or bad, and the best among them do not
act in accordance with Islam's political ideology, either because they are
not familiar with it, or because they have deliberately progressed beyond
it. But how are we to scrutinize the good from the bad when a high level
political official like Mr. Powell undermines the questioning of any
concerns related to this issue?

Certainly, Mr. Powell knows that Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, is most
revered among Muslims. Does Mr. Powell realize that it is incumbent upon
every devout Muslim male to emulate Muhammed's ways? If so, has Mr. Powell
studied the life of Muhammad as it is recounted in the original Arabic
sources, as I learned it in my schooldays?

One particular part of the prophet's historical account I studied in third
grade at primary school. We read with pride how Muhammad beheaded eight
hundred Jews from the Bani Quraiza tribe in one night, then took their wives
and children hostage and spent that same night with a Jewish woman Safia,
whose husband, father and brother he had just killed. This wretched story is
only a drop in the ocean of numerous Arabic narratives written about
Muhammad's misconduct.

Moreover, according to Islam's most revered jurists, a true Muslim must
believe in Islam as both religion and a political entity. A committed Salafi
Muslim does not recognize the American constitution. His willingness to live
under that constitution is, as far as he is concerned, nothing more than an
unavoidable step on the way to that constitution's replacement by Islamic
Sharia law.

The Koran states: "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your
friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their
friendship shall become one of their numbers. Allah does not guide the
wrongdoers" (5:51). Is it legitimate for Christians and Jews to be concerned
about this tenet?

American government officials must spend funds to interpret Arabic texts
word for word, without distortion or falsification. Among other illuminating
tenets they may find, is the concept of taqqia (literally, "caution,
prudence, dissimulation"). It allows a Muslim to conceal his true cherished
beliefs when he feels that non-Muslims around him have the upper hand, while
at the same time working secretly to achieve his "noble" objective, so that
he can attack them when the time is ripe....



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to