http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090112/pl_politico/17334
Land mines ahead for Hillary Amie Parnes, Glenn Thrush Amie Parnes, Glenn Thrush Mon Jan 12, 4:31 am ET Hillary Clinton, ever the preparation junkie, is cramming for Tuesdays confirmation hearing intent on downplaying old disagreements with Barack Obama and parrying questions about her husbands overseas entanglements, aides say. Barring a bombshell revelation, all sides expect Clinton to be speedily confirmed as secretary of state. But her rendezvous with the Foreign Relations Committee at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday still offers its share of potential land mines. Nobodys fonder of huddling secretly with a close-knit, tight-lipped clutch of advisers than Hillary Clinton. And shes been huddling plenty in recent days, gaming out defenses to possible attacks against her husband while synchronizing her policy positions with Obama to avoid embarrassing public disagreements on Iraq, Iran and Israel. If they hit her on any personal stuff or on the Bill st, shell hit the ball out of the park, said a longtime adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity. Shes far more concerned with the substance, the person said. This is the re-emergence of the non-political Hillary. The most discomfort is where she and Obama disagree the youre naive stuff. She cant show up the president, she cant appear like shes trying to formulate her own foreign policy. Clintons task is made easier by the fact that Obama quietly adopted many of his former rivals more hawkish foreign policy positions by the end of the primaries. Her path may also be eased by the fact that Obamas attorney general-designate, Eric Holder, has become the main lightning rod for GOP opposition in the Senate. Holders attracting most of the attention on the right, says Steve Clemons, vice president of the progressive New America Foundation. Shes different. Shes a respected senator, and if they attack her, they will just appear mean and nasty and theyll appear as if they are undermining Americas diplomatic standing. And the Democrats are going to use soft, soft gloves. The committees staff is so confident Clinton will sail through that it has scheduled only a single day of hearings although it has taken the precaution of reserving the committee room for Wednesday just in case. Thats a far cry from previous secretary of state confirmations: In 1981, Al Haig had to endure a five-day grilling about his role in Watergate before earning approval. We expect her confirmation hearing to be congenial, fair and swift, said Sen. John Kerrys committee spokesman Frederick Jones. To ensure that nothing goes awry, Clinton has assembled a confirmation commando unit of sorts, featuring her post-campaign inner circle, including Cheryl Mills, Maggie Williams and her trusted Senate chief of staff, Tamera Luzzatto. To that core, shes added a new collection of Clinton-Obama foreign policy experts to coach her on the issues and the Byzantine bureaucracy at Foggy Bottom. They include Clinton Senate staffer Andrew Shapiro, former ambassadors Joe Huggins and Vickie Huddleston, a pair of incoming deputy secretaries of state Jim Steinberg and Jack Lew Clinton campaign policy maven Jake Sullivan, and Wendy Sherman, a highly regarded State Department veteran who helped shape Bill Clintons Haiti policy in the 1990s. Moreover, the ever-conscientious Clinton has reached out to all of her living predecessors at State, chatting often with pal Madeleine Albright. Shes also contacted every member of the Foreign Relations Committee by phone or in person. One of those sit-downs was with Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the committees top Republican and a close friend of Vice President-elect Joe Biden. Lugar has told Republicans hes concerned about the former presidents charities but that hes convinced Hillary Clinton is up to the job. Nonetheless, there are several potential problem children on the GOP side, with noise likely to come from the committees most conservative members Jim DeMint (R-S.C), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and David Vitter (R-La.). Over the recess, Sen. Vitter has had his staff investigate some of the potential conflicts of interest between the secretary of state and her husbands enterprises, says Vitter spokesman Joel DiGrado. Hes going to ask her to provide a more substantial explanation. Tennessee Republican Bob Corker is also reportedly a concern to Clintons team, not so much over ideology but rather because hes unpredictable, creative and has a knack for getting press. The New York Times stoked the opposition on Sunday, with an editorial exhorting the committee to explore the awkward intersection between Mrs. Clintons new post and the charitable and business activities of her husband. The editorial board, while expressing general support for her appointment, urged the former first lady to revise a five-page agreement with Obama requiring annual reports on Bill Clintons international fundraising efforts on behalf of his charities. Disclosure of Mr. Clintons charitable fundraising and relevant private fees should be done monthly, or at least quarterly, not just once a year, the paper demanded. Obama transition spokeswoman Brooke Anderson quickly swatted aside that suggestion, telling Politico in an e-mail: The agreement with the Clinton Foundation goes well beyond the requirements of the law to help avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. The Bill Clinton controversy is likely to attract the most attention, but Clintons team is actually more focused on erasing lingering doubts about whether she would be an Obama team player, according to people with knowledge of the situation. Clinton and Obama clashed often on foreign affairs during their epic 17-month primary fight. He hammered her early and often over her Oct. 2002 vote for the Iraq invasion and she returned fire by labeling him naïve after a 2007 debate in which he said he would negotiate with foreign despots with no preconditions. But after Clintons defeat, Obama moved closer to Clintons mildly more hawkish worldview and he began speaking out more stridently in support of Israel, ratcheting up his rhetoric against Irans leadership and placing pre-conditions on face-to-face talks with Americas enemies. Still, theres some room for potential problems. One area is Iran: Clinton voted for a 2007 resolution that labeled the countrys Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization; Obama skipped the vote but later said he would have voted no, fearing the resolution could be misused as a pretext for the Bush administration to attack the Tehran regime. And Clinton, a stalwart supporter of Israel in a state that demands such a position, must also be careful not to move too far beyond Obamas noncommittal public statements about Israels controversial and bloody invasion of Gaza. "People should not expect that she will go any further than what [Obama] has said by that point, said a Senate aide familiar with her confirmation preparations. But Clemons, a longtime observer of Washingtons foreign policy establishment, thinks Obama and Clinton are now in such lock-step on most issues that he might use her testimony this week to signal shifts in policy even on Israel. Theres going to be some very subtle shading of language that will be intended to send messages to Israel and others, said Clemons. Correction: An earlier version of this story misreported Clintons vote on a 2007 resolution labeling Irans Revolutionary Guard a terrorist organization. She voted for it. An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. -Winston Churchill [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ -------------------------- Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list, [email protected]. -------------------------- Brooks Isoldi, editor [email protected] http://www.intellnet.org Post message: [email protected] Subscribe: [email protected] Unsubscribe: [email protected] *** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[email protected] mailto:[email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
