It's a cinch that no person with a quarter of a brain would be reminded of
Abraham Lincoln by Obama.
 
B
 
 
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-george-w-bush-reminds-me-of-abraham-lincoln
/



Why George W. Bush Reminds Me of Abraham Lincoln

Posted By Kyle-Anne Shiver On January 16, 2009 @ 12:00 am In . Column1 01, .
Positioning, History, Politics, US News, Uncategorized | 22
<http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/why-george-w-bush-reminds-me-of-abraham-lincol
n/?print=1#comments_controls> Comments

"I desire so to conduct the affairs of this administration that if at the
end, when I come to lay down the reins of power, I have lost every other
friend on earth, I shall at least have one friend left, and that friend
shall be down inside me."

-Abraham Lincoln

Individual, human perspective is such a quirky thing that it's quite
difficult to get a group consensus on anything more political than how we're
all going to set our clocks. Here we are, as a nation, about to inaugurate a
new president who has, from his very first announcement of his intention to
seek the office, purposefully and calculatingly portrayed himself as the new
embodiment of Abraham Lincoln, while at the very same time we bid farewell
to the current president, who has reminded me more of the actual Lincoln
than any other I've seen in my lifetime.

Clearly, we have very divergent perspectives at work here.

George W. Bush is the seventh president I've watched in action, and of all
the other men who've held the office, he seems to have been the most like
Lincoln. On many levels, actually.

>From the very beginning of G.W.'s presidency, with the vituperative campaign
to dis-entitle his election, the nation was torn apart emotionally, if not
formally. Abraham Lincoln's election with a mere 39% of the popular vote was
the impetus for Southern secession and the formation of a temporary, but
absolutely separate nation on American soil. In very short order, Lincoln
faced the Confederates' firing on Fort Sumter.

President Bush had been in office a mere seven and a half months when
al-Qaeda carried out its long-concocted plan to bring down the Twin Towers
and strike the heart of our nation's capitol. For a very, very short time,
it seemed that our United States would rally and come together for what
promised to be a protracted fight against the global forces of terror that
emanated from the Islamic world. But that unity was so short-lived that it
is now but a vague recollection, briefly restored each year for anniversary
solemnity.

A mere ten days after our generation's day of infamy on 9/11, President Bush
gave an address to both houses of Congress, in which he declared America's
intentions. His quite eloquent summation included this determined
proclamation:

And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism.
Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with
us or you are with the terrorists.

>From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support
terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime. Our
nation has been put on notice, we're not immune from attack. We will take
defensive measures against terrorism to protect Americans. Today, dozens of
federal departments and agencies, as well as state and local governments,
have responsibilities affecting homeland security.

On October 2, 2002, President Bush received from Congress the 22-point [1]
Joint Resolution Authorizing the Use of Force in Iraq
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-2.html> , a quite
formal, simple, straightforward resolution of war against the Hussein
regime. In March of 2003, Operation Iraqi Freedom was initiated, with vast
public support. Less than eight months later, Democrat Fat Cat George Soros
told a Washington Post interviewer that President Bush's words above, "for
us or against us," reminded him of "Adolph Hitler and the Nazis," words he
heard as a child in Hungary.

>From that point onward, the anti-war, anti-Bush zealots in America began to
resemble Lincoln's own wartime nemeses, the [2] Copperhead
<http://www.civilwarhome.com/copperheads.htm> Democrats. From Lincoln's
first declaration that he intended to save the Union from dissolution, angry
factions within the pro-slavery opposing party denounced him vociferously in
the press. A number of northern newspapers, controlled by the Copperheads,
incited draft riots in major cities, while claiming Lincoln's murderous
intentions toward the Constitution. Lincoln's wartime suspension of habeas
corpus and his locking up suspected rebel leaders in the border states
without trial, caused his lynching in effigy in many a northern township.

Just as Lincoln saw his generals mess up and his troops mired in defeat
again and again, before finding his Grant and turning loose his Sherman,
George W. Bush endured the seemingly never-ending bog of Iraq until he found
his Petraeus. As the Iraq war magnetized the struggle with Islamic terrorist
groups worldwide, and they came to take their stand in "Bush's war," victory
seemed as distant and as completely unpredictable as did Lincoln's own in
the middle years.

>From very early in the Iraq war, when it became obvious that the mission was
not going to be accomplished without supreme determination and conviction,
the press turned against the president. His every move - wiretapping
terrorist suspects, sending prisoners to Guantanamo, the practice of
rendition, the Patriot Act - everything the man did became a cause
celebrated by his political enemies. Even though President Bush has survived
to the end of his second term alive, and not assassinated ([3] movies
<http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0853096/>  don't count) as was Lincoln, he is
leaving the Oval Office every bit as much maligned as was his fateful
predecessor, Abraham Lincoln.

Just as Lincoln persevered very much alone throughout most of the Civil War,
so has George W. Bush in his time of war. Fighting foes from not only
without, but also within, plagued both men. It was Lincoln who wrote in his
time of war, "I think the Constitution invests its Commander-in-Chief with
the law of war in time of war." G. W. Bush had to have taken some solace in
these words while he fought his own battles for necessary wiretaps and
military tribunals, even as the ACLU and the New York Times openly accused
him of trampling the Constitution.

The writing of history is every bit as quirky as individual human
perspective. George W. Bush may very well acquire the near-saintly
remembrances inspired by Lincoln at some future date.

I doubt sincerely that I'll be alive to see that, if it should happen, but I
do know that as I watch Barack Obama's swearing in, I'll be reminded that it
takes a lot more courage, conviction, and character to actually earn one's
likening to a former great president. It takes far more than hailing
coincidentally from the same state or using the same Bible for the oath. And
for ill or good, George W. Bush has earned his comparison to Lincoln in his
darkest days of solitude in the same Oval Office.

I shall miss the man - G.W. - and his stalwart character, even if I stand
entirely alone in it



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to