http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2009/01/20/obamas_inaugural_address

Obama's Inaugural Address
Cal Thomas
Tuesday, January 20, 2009


"What does change mean?" asked Woodrow Wilson in his inaugural address. That
is a question which will soon be answered by President Barack Obama. 

What surprised me most about Obama's speech was its lack of passion. It was
lacking in the soaring oratory we have come to expect, especially when
compared to other speeches he has delivered, most notably on Election Night.
It seemed as cold as the subfreezing weather. Maybe he was trying to lower
expectations. He succeeded.

 <http://magazine.townhall.com/coulter> 


Still, there were a number of themes which conservatives can praise. Among
them, a message to terrorists that "you will not defeat us" and a pledge to
eliminate wasteful government programs. That is easier said than done given
that Congress will make those decisions, not the new president. Every
government program attracts constituencies that argue how essential they
are. 

I enjoyed his line dismissing "worn-out dogmas" but wonder what he means by
it. When a liberal dogma and a conservative dogma face off, which dogma will
bite and which will roll over? When liberals talk like this, they usually
require the conservative to compromise his principles in order to receive
their blessing. During his relatively brief time in elective office, Obama
has not been known for seeking common ground. Words ought to mean something.
What does he mean by his? 

Obama hinted at what he intends do about embryonic stem cell research and
possibly "global warming," saying he wants to "restore science to its
rightful place." What place would that be? Above morality and common sense?
Above other scientists who disagree? There is no consensus about global
warming. In fact, there are growing numbers of scientists and growing
amounts of scientific evidence questioning whether this is indeed a
dangerously warming planet. Will Obama rely only on those scientists who
agree with his political positions? 

On stem cell research, new science is showing that adult stem cells may
fulfill the objectives originally believed to be achieved only with embryos.
Which science will prevail in such cases? Will it be real science, or the
"science" that supports the objectives of the liberal wing of the Democratic
Party? 

No one can deny the significance of Obama's moment. An Inauguration is a
demonstration to the world of what makes America unique and great.
Inauguration Day was the fun part. Now comes the hard part. The Wall Street
Journal published a graph that showed every president but one since Harry
Truman left office with a far lower approval rating than when he entered.
The exception was Bill Clinton. With his approval numbers higher than any
incoming president, Barack Obama cannot help but decline in public favor. 

Part of this is due to our placing too much faith in politicians who cannot
deliver all we want. Let's see how long the public continues to be enamored
with him. And let's see how serious he is about finding common ground with
conservatives. 

The media coverage of the Inauguration gave a preview of how they might
cover the Second Coming. It was total worship. No doubts were expressed; no
questions about his ability to do anything -- from healing the economy to
bringing peace to the Middle East. The media have at last found a god in
whom they can believe. They are worshipping at the altar of the church of
Barack Obama. Journalists and some of their ideological cable TV allies have
so much invested in Obama's success that they will be hard-pressed to
criticize him for anything and can probably be counted on to explain and
justify any mistakes he makes, at least in the first two years. 

In his inaugural address, Herbert Hoover spoke of America's "fruits of
accomplishment." He added he had "no fears for the future of our country. It
is bright with hope." There followed by just a few months the stock market
crash of 1929 and the Great Depression. Hope can be dangerous if it is
misplaced. 

Alexander Pope wrote, "Hope springs eternal in the human breast; Man never
Is, but always To be blest: The soul, uneasy and confin'd from home, Rests
and expatiates in a life to come." ("An Essay on Man," 1733) 

Pope's hope was in eternal life. Anyone who invests hope in temporal
politicians is almost certain to be disappointed. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to