http://anti-jihad.org/blog/2009/01/obama/
 

Will Obama's Administration Legitimize Islamic Supremacism?

By 
Jeffrey Imm
on January 19, 2009 

In March 2008, I challenged
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/079.html>  Senator
Barack Obama to expand on his August
<http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.php> 2007
comments that terrorists "seek to create a repressive caliphate... To defeat
this enemy, we must understand who we are fighting against, and what we are
fighting for."  In his August
<http://www.barackobama.com/2007/08/01/the_war_we_need_to_win.php> 2007
speech, Senator Obama stated that terrorists "distort Islam."

But Barack Obama never recognized that such an Islamic supremacist caliphate
is a central goal of the Islamic
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/090.html> supremacist
ideology itself.  Moreover, instead of demonstrating an understanding of the
enemy and condemning those who support such an Islamic supremacist
caliphate, thus far Barack Obama has continued to send signals to legitimize
Islamic supremacist supporters.

During his campaign, it was learned that Barack Obama's church had promoted
<http://www.bizzyblog.com/wp-images/TUCChamasColumn072207.jpg>  the Islamic
supremacist Hamas organization in a church bulletin. During his campaign,
Barack Obama had designated WINEP's Dennis Ross as his Mideast
<http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1823145,00.html> advisor;
this same Dennis Ross was named
<http://www.usmuslimengagement.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id
=15&Itemid=44#Ross>  as part of a U.S.-Muslim Engagement
<http://www.usmuslimengagement.org/> Project group that issued a report
<http://www.usmuslimengagement.org/storage/usme/documents/Changing_Course_-_
A_New_Direction_for_US_Relations_with_the_Muslim_World.pdf>  in September
2008 calling for engagement
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/engagement_with_mb.html
>  with the Islamic supremacist Muslim Brotherhood whose organization makes
establish an Islamic supremacist caliphate part of their goals.  The Muslim
Brotherhood specifically calls <http://www.ummah.net/ikhwan/>  for "Building
the Khilafa" and "Mastering the world with Islam."  This is the same Islamic
supremacist "repressive caliphate" that Barack Obama claimed he was against
in August 2007, and this is the same Muslim Brotherhood that has sought to
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/document/id/20> undermine the United
States from within
<http://www.douglasfarah.com/article/245/the-muslim-brotherhood-in-america-d
efined-as-threat-organization-in-dod-memo.com> .

Now, at Barack Obama's inaugural festivities, Ingrid Mattson, president of
the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), will
<http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/01/17/america/Inauguration-Prayer.php>
be offering a prayer at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C., on
Wednesday
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/17/many-religions-to-be-repres
ented/> morning, attended by the new president and vice-president.  This is
the same ISNA organization that was listed as an unindicted
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/documents/Attachment+A+%28List+of+Unindic
ted+Co-conspirators%29.pdf> co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial
(page 8, item VII.3), and that has been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and
Hamas during that trial.  This is the same ISNA whose national
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/094.html#ISNA_2008>
conventions have included Islamic supremacists as featured
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/094.html#ISNA_2008>
speakers with a history of supporting such an Islamic
<http://www.kashmirtelegraph.com/jagan.htm> supremacist caliphate, such as
Siraj Wahhaj.  

This is the same ISNA, whose featured speakers have included:
-- Abdallah Idris Ali - has been on the board of the American
<http://frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID=FB47D145-E8C5-41AD-ACE8-23F
219F6F1A5> Muslim Council, an organization whose leaders have openly
supported terrorist groups, such as Hamas
-- Ihsan Bagby: "we [Muslims] can never be full
<http://www.meforum.org/article/388> citizens of this country... because
there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies
of this country."
-- Zaid Shakir: "Every
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/us/18imams.html?ei=5090&en=0e7bc45a0b83a4
6b&ex=1308283200&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=all> Muslim who is
honest would say, I would like to see America become a Muslim country"
-- CAIR's Nihad Awad - historical supporter
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/223>  of Hamas terrorist group:
"I am in support of the Hamas movement"

This is the same ISNA that has hosted the Islamic
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/018046.php> supremacist Hizb-ut-Tahrir,
a group that calls such a global caliphate, at such ISNA annual conventions.
Ingrid Mattson's "inter-faith" experience includes divisive efforts to
portray Christians
<http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2007/03/14/islamic_leader_urges_j
ews_be_wary_of_fundamentalists/> as being enemies of Jews.

Moreover, as pointed out in Robert
<http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=91FE16A6-5394-4855-905
A-7FB24FBDCF7B> Spencer's commentary on Ingrid Mattson's role on the
inaugural festivities, "Hamas
<http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=91FE16A6-5394-4855-905
A-7FB24FBDCF7B> Inauguration," this is the same Ingrid Mattson who appeared
to defend the idea of an Islamic supremacist caliphate in an October 2001
<http://archives.cnn.com/2001/COMMUNITY/10/18/mattson.cnna/> CNN chat by
stating that "the overthrowing of the caliphate... was a plan of European
powers for many years. This deprived the Muslim world of a stable and
centralized authority, and much of the chaos that we're living in today is
the result of that."

Is Barack Obama's involvement with Ingrid Mattson and Dennis Ross the
direction that Barack Obama plans to take in challenging those who "seek to
create a repressive caliphate"?  We need to hold Barack Obama responsible
for this.

Regarding ISNA's Ingrid Mattson's speaking at Obama inaugural festivities,
the Associated
<http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/01/17/america/Inauguration-Prayer.php>
Press reported that "Linda Douglass, a spokeswoman for Obama's inaugural
committee, would not discuss the case or say whether the committee knew
about it. 'She has a stellar reputation in the faith community,' Douglass
said Saturday night."  


Rejecting Defeatism in Defending Equality and Liberty

When the Washington Times reported
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/17/many-religions-to-be-repres
ented/>  the story on Ingrid Mattson's involvement in the Obama inaugural
festivities, angry readers voiced
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/17/many-religions-to-be-repres
ented/>  their outrage in the comments part of the story online.  The
Washington Times religion editor, Julia Duin, responded
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/inauguration-blog/2009/Jan/18/who-wi
ll-be-wednesday/>  by writing that "Lots of react has come into our site --
most of it negative -- about Ingrid Mattson, the president of the Islamic
Society of North America being given a role. I thought they could have made
far worse choices, and Ingrid did preview herself, in a fashion, by
appearing at an interfaith panel at the Democratic National Convention."

Certainly, Ms. Duin was correct in that it could have been worse.  Instead
of the president of an unindicted co-conspirator in terror trial, they could
have chosen the head of an indicted terror conspirator, a convicted
terrorist, someone from Al-Qaeda, or even Osama Bin Laden.  Yes, it could
have been "worse."  But that is hardly the point, is it?

Sadly, this acceptance of "it could have been worse" mentality provides a
snapshot of exactly what is wrong with America today, and what we must
dedicate ourselves to changing. 

How much of the infiltration by Islamic supremacist appeasers and supporters
in our military
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/090.html#H.4> , law
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/091.html> enforcement,
foreign
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/engagement_with_mb.html
> policy, counterterrorism
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/107.html>  community
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/105.html> , homeland
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/126.pdf> security,
Congress <http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/791> , and our federal
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/118.html> government --
can be tied back to the slow, defeatist acceptance by too many that "it
could have been worse"?

I am certain that Ms. Duin didn't even realize how defeatist her comments
were, because defeatism has become so pervasive among many.  But we cannot
merely shrug our shoulders in acceptance of the gradual assimilation of
America and democracy to accepting Islamic supremacism, or tolerate the
legitimization of those ideologies that stand against equality and liberty.

In fact, some will always argue it could be worse.  But our founding fathers
did not look at Britain's tyranny and look to each other and say "it could
have been worse," nor did those who confronted Nazi supremacists, nor did
those who confronted white supremacists.  They did not turn their hands
upside down and shrug "it could have been worse."  

Despite this, we can expect to hear more "it could have been worse"
tolerance of the intolerable when it comes to accepting those associated
with and supporting Islamic supremacism.  We must not let "it could have
been worse" become the epitaph for America's future and the future of
equality and liberty.  

Because when it comes to appeasing Islamic supremacists who seek to
undermine  <http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/090.html#A>
equality and liberty, it couldn't be worse.  America is under attack - at
the very heart of who and what we are.  This is not an attack on our
buildings or on our people, but an attack
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/120.html>  on our
identity and our inalienable human rights of equality and liberty.

Our responsibility
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/120.html> for equality
and liberty means that we can never accept excuses that "it could have been
worse." Defeatism is not something those responsible for equality and
liberty can accept.  Defeatism is not the character of America or Americans.
Americans don't accept "it could have been worse," but strive for "it could
be the best."
  
We need a new era in America - of expecting the best, not tolerating the
least or accepting the worst.  To do this, we need to identify the Islamic
supremacist enemy, and expect the best of America and America's leaders to
confront Islamic
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/090.html> supremacism.
Others may embrace defeatism, but not America, and especially not now.  We
can and will demand
<http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/imm-articles/120.html>  the best of
America and its leaders, including Barack Obama and his administration.  It
is our nation, not just our elected representatives' nation; we need to
constantly remind them who makes the real decisions in America.

Yes, we can.

Fear No Evil.

 

It may be better to be a live jackal than a dead lion, but it is better
still to be a live lion. And usually easier. - Robert A. Heinlein

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to