07/20/2010 09:54 AM

Setting a Date for the Pullout


Kabul Conference to Herald End of NATO Mission


By Matthias <mailto:[email protected]>  Gebauer and Shoib Najafizada 
in Kabul

Under tight security, the foreign ministers of NATO states are convening 
Tuesday in Kabul. Despite massive problems and a weak President Hamid Karzai, 
the military alliance wants to set a timeframe for the withdrawal of their 
troops -- a very ambitious goal.

The last few months have been the bloodiest in the war against the Taliban and 
the Afghan government's performance remains disappointing. Nevertheless, a 
meeting of international foreign ministers in the capital Kabul on Tuesday is 
to decide on the end of the international military mission in 2014.

By then, according to the plan, all the country's 34 provinces will have been 
handed over to Afghan security forces. Local militia and police will have taken 
over responsibility for stability and security. That plan is laid out in the 
latest draft for the 10-page final communiqué of the Kabul Conference, agreed 
after lengthy negotiations. The meeting began on Tuesday morning.

But the document doesn't state how fast the international troops -- which 
currently total 150,000 -- are to be withdrawn. United States President Barack 
Obama announced in 2009 that he would look at the possibility of reducing US 
troop numbers. It is widely expected that Obama will start withdrawing troops, 
partly for domestic political reasons, and will thereby de facto usher in the 
pullout of all NATO forces.

Germany too wants to hand over the first northern province to the Afghans. At 
present the German army, the Bundeswehr, has 5,500 troops in northern 
Afghanistan. But sources close to the German military doubt whether the German 
or all the international troops will be withdrawn in full by 2014 -- logistical 
factors alone would render that barely possible, they say. German Foreign 
Minister Guido Westerwelle, who arrived in Kabul on Tuesday morning, dampened 
hopes for an end of the whole mission by 2014. Even after the Afghans have 
assumed responsibility for security, there "will still be soldiers, civilian 
reconstruction helpers and police officers from the international community" in 
the country, Westerwelle said.

Precarious Security at the Conference 

The draft of the final communiqué obtained by SPIEGEL ONLINE is vague about 
whether the NATO mission will really end in 2014. Paragraph 17 states that the 
international community will continue to provide "the necessary support to 
increase security," and will continue to help train, finance and equip the 
Afghan army if necessary. Still, the mere naming of a date in itself sets an 
important goal, diplomats say.

The year 2014 therefore seems as symbolic as the whole conference. The 
withdrawal plan is not really new. At a meeting in London in the spring, the 
nations involved in Afghanistan had already envisaged this date, but given the 
rapid decline in support for the dangerous mission the determination to set a 
firm timetable for withdrawal is greater than ever. In pushing for a pullout, 
the old goals -- alongside beating the Taliban it used to be bringing democracy 
to Afghanistan and strengthening human rights -- are gradually being jettisoned.

In the run-up to the meeting, Western diplomats said the day trip to Kabul was 
a symbol rather than a conference. For the first time the nations providing aid 
and troops are meeting in the country itself. Tens of thousands of soldiers, 
police and secret service agents have transformed the capital into a ghost 
town. The guests will be raced through empty streets from the airport to the 
Foreign Ministry and back after a few hours. There won't be much time for 
discussion. 

A reminder of the security challenge came on Monday evening when rockets were 
fired into the outskirts of the city. The police played down the strike. The 
Interior Ministry said rocket attacks were "normal" in Kabul.

On Tuesday, morning a loud explosion was heard in the north of the city. The 
Interior Ministry said children had touched an old landmine and caused it to 
explode. Three people were injured.

Measures for Reintegrating Top Taliban Leaders Remain Unclear 

Security at the conference is a hot-button topic for the government and its 
authorities. If anything happens, transferring responsibility to the Afghans 
will appear to be an unachievable goal.

In Kabul, President Hamid Karzai is also expected to announce several programs 
aimed at improving the government's work and reconciling, domestically, with 
the Taliban. To help those programs, the West wants to create a fund that, 
through job-creation measures, promotion of training schemes and support for 
rural regions, will make it convincing for Taliban foot-soldiers to return to 
society. Germany is expected to provide a large share of the funding, with a 
pledge of over €50 million over the next five years. But it remains unclear 
what, if any, measures will be taken to reintegrate Taliban commanders and 
leadership.

The Aghans have different priorities. Sources within the government in Kabul 
say that Karzai's push to directly control 50 percent of the foreign 
development aid coming in to Afghanistan instead of the current 20 percent will 
be more on the front burner on the Afghan side than the Taliban reintegration 
programs. Despite concerns in Western capitals that such a step would only lead 
to additional aid money seeping away, the foreign ministers are expected to 
approve the plan -- with preconditions that Karzai must fulfil. The amount of 
money pouring into the country is immense -- since 2002, around $40 billion has 
been sent to Afghanistan.

If the draft of the closing statement is approved as currently written, then 
President Karzai and the NATO member states together will be setting ambitious 
goals. The draft text states that by 2011, the number of Afghan soldiers will 
rise to 170,000, and a further 134,000 should also be trained. Karzai, for his 
part, is aiming to coax 36,000 Taliban fighters to lay down their weapons in 
just five years -- a very ambitious target. Economically, he wants to raise 
state revenues, an almost impossible undertaking in a country in which almost 
every official makes a living through corruption.

But first the meeting has to take place. Logistically, an attack by the Taliban 
or further rockets fired at the city would be enough to force a quick end to 
the summit and send a disastrous message around the world. 

But there are also problems in terms of the content of the closing statement, 
and on Monday night, it was unclear if diplomats would approve the language in 
its current form despite weeks of striving to come up with a document all could 
accept. They know that the time pressure of the conference creates maneuvering 
room for spontaneous changes. And a failure, as is always the case with NATO 
summits on the Afghanistan issue, is not an option in Kabul. 





URL:


*       http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,707432,00.html

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to