http://cnsnews.com/news/article/69669

 

Census Officials in New York Instructed Workers to Falsify Questionnaires,
Says Inspector General
Tuesday, July 20, 2010
By Edwin Mora 




 (CNSNews.com) - The Commerce Department's Inspector General (IG) has
confirmed whistleblower allegations that management at a local Census office
in Brooklyn, N.Y., "directed employees to falsify Census questionnaires
during" the decennial count's largest and most expensive operation known as
Non-response Follow-Up.  
 
Furthermore, the IG noted that during the Census Bureau's efforts to
re-count the fabricated questionnaires, employees charged with that task
"were inferring the number of household residents through improper means."  
 
"The complaints specifically alleged that the [Brooklyn Northeast local
Census office] manager and assistant manager for field operations had
directed employees to falsify enumeration questionnaires using information
from an Internet database rather than attempting to conduct in-person
interviews as required by Census procedures," Todd Zinser, IG for the
Department of Commerce, stated in
<http://www.oig.doc.gov/oig/reports/congressional_testimony_and_briefings/20
10_07_12_IG_House_Census_Brooklyn.pdf> written testimony prepared for a
hearing held by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform in
Brooklyn, N.Y., on Monday. 

The accuracy of the Census count is important because the 435 members of the
U.S. Congress are apportioned among the 50 states by population. States that
have relatively more people by the Census count are entitled to more members
of Congress than states that have relatively fewer people. If New York's
Census count were artificially inflated by falsified questionnaires that
could increase New York's representation in Congress.
 
The fabrications took place "during Non-response Follow-up (NRFU), the
Census operation in which enumerators visit and conduct interviews at
addresses where the households did not respond to the original Census
questionnaires," added Zinser.  
 
"In short, based on Census's internal findings and our own independent
investigative efforts, the initial allegations have been confirmed," he
explained.  
 
"We became aware of the allegations concerning the Brooklyn Northeast LCO
[local Census office] on June 14, 2010, when our hotline center received two
e-mailed complaints alleging improprieties by the LCO manager and assistant
manager for field operations," testified Zinser. 
 
"Our hotline center received a third e-mail on June 16, repeating the same
allegations as the earlier complaints, but also indicating that an LCO
operations supervisor resigned rather than comply with the managers'
orders," he later added. 
 
According to the IG, the assistant manager for field operations and two
office clerks, between June 9 and 11, printed out an estimated "1,000 blank
questionnaires" from a commercial Internet database used by the Census. 
 
The Internet database known as FastData, which should have been restricted
to the assistant manager, was used to forge Census questionnaires used to
count households. 
 
"On June 12 and 13. [Brooklyn Northeast office] manager instructed two
clerks to fill out the questionnaires using the supplied FastData printouts,
and, in the sections that were not covered by the FastData information, to
falsely record that the resident had refused to respond. Finally, these two
clerks relayed the [local Census office] manager's instructions to other
clerks in the office, who in turn completed questionnaires in the same
improper manner," added Zinser. 
 
The commerce IG pointed out that according to early media accounts of the
situation "there were approximately 10,000 cases of potential
falsification."  
 
"However, this was Census's rough estimate given the information available
at the time. Our current understanding, from Census's analysis of the
incident, is that 4,221 household records required re-enumeration as a
result of the whistleblower allegations," stated the Commerce IG. 
 
The IG pointed out that there is no evidence to suggest that the local
office manager and the assistant manager were instructed to "take this
improper action" by headquarters or the regional Census center in charge of
the Brooklyn Northeast office. 
 
"On July 7, my office contacted the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern
District of New York about the whistleblower allegations we received
concerning the Brooklyn Northeast LCO," testified Zinser. "Only the
Department of Justice can determine whether criminal prosecution is
warranted in this case."
 
The IG pointed out that the Census Bureau has safeguards in place to protect
against the misuse of FastData, "such as restricted access and written
guidance on the database's appropriate use." 
 
While the IG gave the Census Bureau credit for conducting its own
investigation and taking corrective action, he also noted that "additional
allegations have been raised with respect to the [bureau's] remediation
efforts." 
 
"Two subsequent complaints to OIG and Census allege that these efforts have
caused additional problems," explained Zinser. "On July 7 and 8, we received
allegations that during remediation efforts, some of the employees assigned
from the other Brooklyn [local Census offices] to perform the re-enumeration
were inferring the number of household residents through improper means." 
 
The office of the inspector general at the Commerce Department and the
Census Bureau "have each independently substantiated this allegation," added
Zinser. 
 
Zinser concluded that a misinterpretation of Census Bureau "directives for
enumerators to follow in last-resort cases" may have led employees to
improperly count the number of household residents.  
 
"These directives state in part that enumerators, together with their crew
leaders, 'may make the determination about the status of the address based
on their best judgment,'" testified the IG.  
 
"Census defines 'status' as whether the housing unit at a given address is
considered occupied, vacant, or nonexistent-but it did not intend for its
instructions to direct enumerators to make assumptions about and enter the
number of residents on the questionnaire," explained Zinser

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to