http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0710/hanson072210.php3?printer_friendly

 

July 22, 2010 

The New Racial Mess 

By Victor Davis Hanson 

Weren't we supposed to enter a new age of tolerance with the election of
President Barack Obama?

His half-black, half-white ancestry and broad support across racial lines
suggested that at last Americans judged each other on the content of our
characters -- not the color of our skin or our tribal affiliations.

Instead, in just 18 months of the Obama administration, racial discord is
growing and relations seem to have been set back a generation.

Black voters are galvanizing behind Obama at a time of rapidly falling
support. White independents, in contrast, are leaving Obama in droves.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People has claimed
that the loosely organized Tea Party includes "racist elements." The
National Council of La Raza has ripped the state of Arizona for its new
anti-illegal alien legislation. Jesse Jackson characterized aspects of the
multimillion-dollar bidding war to acquire basketball superstar LeBron James
in terms of masters and slaves. Pundits are arguing whether the fringe
racist New Black Panther Party is analogous to the Klan.

In turn, a number of Americans want to know why -- nearly a half-century
after the Civil Rights Act, affirmative action and Great Society programs --
some national lobbying organizations still identify themselves by archaic
tribal terms such as "colored people" or "La Raza" ("the race") when it
would be taboo for other groups to adopt such racial nomenclature.

Indeed, race seems to be the subtext of almost every contemporary issue,
from the soaring deficit and government spending to recent presidential
appointments and the enforcement of existing immigration law. In times of
growing deficits, white people are stereotyped as being angry over
supposedly paying higher taxes to subsidize minorities, while minorities are
stereotyped as being mostly on the receiving end of entitlements.

Why the escalation of racial tension in the supposed postracial age of
Obama?

First, Obama's reputation as a racial healer was largely the creation of the
media. In fact, Obama had a number of racially polarizing incidents that
probably would have disqualified any other presidential candidate of the
past 30 years.

His two-decade apprenticeship at Trinity Church under the racist and
anti-Semitic Rev. Jeremiah Wright has never been adequately explained. Obama
indulged in racial stereotyping himself when he wrote off the white
lower-middle class of Pennsylvania as clueless zealots clinging to their
guns, religion and xenophobia.

Obama also characterized his grandmother as a "typical white person" when he
implied that her supposed fear of young black males symbolizes the
prejudices of the entire white community. Michelle Obama did not help things
when, in clumsy fashion, she indicted America as "just downright mean"-- a
nation she had not been proud of in her adult life until it embraced the
hope and change represented by her husband's candidacy.

Such campaign trash talk did not stop during the first 18 months of the
Obama presidency. The race-baiting Van Jones -- the short-lived presidential
advisor on "green jobs" -- should never have been appointed. Then, the
president himself criticized Cambridge, Mass., police for acting "stupidly"
when they arrested his friend, Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates.

Then there was the outburst of Attorney General Eric Holder, who blasted
America as "a nation of cowards" for not talking more about race on his
terms. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor was almost obsessive in
self-referencing herself as a "Latina." She also suggested that her racial
background and experiences made her "wise" in a way white male colleagues
could never be.

Recently, Obama appealed to voters along exclusionary race and gender lines
-- not traditional political allegiances -- when he called upon "the young
people, African-Americans, Latinos and women, who powered our victory in
2008."

Yet the country passed the old white/black divide years ago. We are a
racially diverse society of Asians, blacks, Hispanics, whites, and mixtures
of all that and more. In a world of conservative Cubans and liberal whites,
race is no longer necessarily a guide to politics.

Who now, exactly, is the racial "Other" deserving of special consideration
in hiring and education? A half-Punjabi immigrant whose father owns 500
acres? A three-quarters Puerto Rican who just arrived in New York? A
Korean-American son of an orthodontist? The African-American children of a
Cabinet official?

The more the president appeals to his base in racial terms, the more his
appointees identify themselves as members of a particular tribe, and the
more political issues are framed by racial divisions, so all the more such
racial obsession creates a backlash among the racially diverse American
people.

America has largely moved beyond race. Tragically, our president and a host
of his supportive special interests have not.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to