http://cnsnews.com/news/article/69734

 

The NAACP Cries Racism
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
 <http://cnsnews.com/commentator/l._brent_bozell_iii> By L. Brent Bozell III
<http://cnsnews.com/commentary/outloudopinion> 
Listen to Commentary Podcasts 




Almost from the moment Barack Obama declared he would run for president in
2007, our enraptured media elite has been accusing anyone who would stand in
Obama's way with racism. The question was never whether Obama was ready to
govern the country, but whether the country was ready for the historic
awesomeness of Obama. 
    
Pity the NAACP. We now have a black president, and they must convince
(racist) America that there still exists the need for a national association
to advance "colored people" in our society. How to do it? Identify and
condemn as "racists" anyone or any group opposed to Barack Obama. 
    
Apparently you cannot sincerely oppose a crushing tax burden, a useless
"stimulus" bill, ObamaCare, or any other element of his socialist agenda
without being tagged as a bigot.
     
In case there was any doubt that the NAACP was carrying water for the White
House political machine, Michelle Obama appeared before the NAACP convention
and insisted there was still persistent racism in America, and the group's
founders would "urge us to increase our intensity" - to fight for President
Obama. 
    
The merger is so obvious they could now be called the NAA-DNC. 
    
Now the NAACP has found its mojo. It is slandering the Tea Party as
"racist." In an article on CNN.com headlined "The Tea Party Must Police
Itself," NAACP chief Benjamin Jealous smeared the entire movement: "The
avowed racist David Duke notes that thousands of Tea Party activists have
urged him to run for president. When the Tea Party marches by, Duke thinks
it's his fiesta." 
 
Since when did the NAACP - or anyone else, for that matter- give a hoot what
David Duke thinks of anything? 
     
On its own website, the NAACP continues to rehash all those unproven
allegations that "respected members of the Congressional Black Caucus
reported that racial epithets were hurled at them as they passed by a
Washington, DC health care protest." But let's stop calling them "unproven
allegations." 
 
Let's call them what they are: lies. There is no video evidence that this
ever occurred, but the NAACP doesn't care about the evidence in its kangaroo
court. They even repeated that "Representative Emanuel Cleaver was spat upon
during the incident." In the real world, Cleaver quickly walked away from
his own story when video footage proved it wasn't true.  
     
The NAACP's video recounting the "racism" of the Tea Party had plenty of
objectionable signs suggesting Obama was a fascist and "It's 1939 Germany
all over again." Someone needs to research the meaning of the word "racism."
It gets better. 
 
The NAACP-endorsed video of purportedly racist signs even includes two shots
of Confederate flags and "hateful" messages like "We Need a Christian
President" and the sitcom catch phrase "What You Talking About, Willis?" A
poster imposing Obama's face with a Mr. T Mohawk hairdo next to the words
"Gimme Yo Change" may be odd, but it's not racist. 
 
It sure sounds like there weren't many racist signs at Tea Party rallies if
that's all they could muster.
     
But "Bush Lied, Thousands Died" - that's okay. 
     
The bigger problem for the NAACP is that it has its very own racists. Andrew
Breitbart's Big Government website revealed video of a NAACP banquet where
U.S. Department of Agriculture appointee Shirley Sherrod talked about how
she didn't want to help a white farmer because he should be helped by "his
own kind." The contempt in her voice, in her face, and in the audience's
laughter is unmistakable. 
 
So where are all those news outlets which dutifully covered the NAACP's
attacks on the Tea Party now? The network evening news and morning news
shows avoided this racist video entirely on the first day.  
 
Nevertheless, the cable news networks picked it up, and within hours,
Shirley Sherrod had resigned from the Agriculture Department. Sherrod was
clearly furious that her racist remarks were exposed. 
 
CNN analyst Roland Martin asserted that Sherrod had to go, because with a
political appointment, remarks like this ruin the perception that Sherrod
would be fair in distributing government help. Sherrod screamed right back
at him that he was "clearly from a different world" than the deeply racist
world she lived in.
    
The bottom line is not only that Sherrod needed to go - but that the TV
elite must stop ignoring this, and stop pretending that black racism and
discriminatory attitudes do not exist. If Obama's election was supposed to
heal our race relations, then the media should put this controversy back on
his desk and press him to address it

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to