http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.7071/pub_detail.asp
Blacklisted Scientist Challenges Global Warming Orthodoxy
August 17, 2010 - Dianna Cotter
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for years has been
predicting the greenhouse effect can spin out of control. They claim that
there exists a scientific consensus that CO2 is pushing the planet into an
unrestrained greenhouse effect, that it's raising global temperatures and it
must be stopped. IPCC was created in the 1980s by the United Nations. They
have released findings that say that carbon-based emissions released into
the atmosphere by humans, mostly in wealthy, Western countries, must be
reduced, or a catastrophe will result. They have frequently used this scare
tactic. It has been easy to frighten people, as the science involved takes
some significant and serious study. Most people have relied on expert
opinions because they lack their own expert knowledge in the field, a factor
the IPCC has relied upon in the past.
Today Hungarian atmospheric physicist <http://miskolczi.webs.com/> Dr.
Ferenc Miskolczi, says he has found and proven that the IPCC and their
experts are wrong in their theory about how the greenhouse effect works. In
the process, he has shown that changing CO2 concentrations are not the
determining factor the IPCC and other scientists claim.
Over the last 20 years Miskolczi achieved several results which prove that
the greenhouse effect in the Earth's atmosphere is completely dependent on
energy. The IPCC would have the world believe that it is the ingredients of
the atmosphere which matter more than the energy, and that it is rising
levels of CO2 that are causing global warming.
Working with a number of sets of temperature and humidity data from all over
the world, Miskolczi has found that the greenhouse effect is a balance of
energy dependent primarily on the sun. This is something reasonable people
have recognized for some time but haven't been able to prove without the
same sort of heavy science and math the IPCC experts have been using. Those
who disagree with the IPCC's conclusions have needed some form of proof to
back their positions. Until now, those proofs have been too few in number to
slow Anthropogenic Global Warming's (AGW) momentum backed with billions of
dollars. Solid science which can be verified and recreated has been needed
and Miskolczi claims that his research has finally provided just that. New
mathematical equations seem to have put the players in this climate game
into their proper places.
To put it very simply, Dr. Miskolczi has described previously unknown
properties of our atmosphere.
Unfortunately it isn't as clean and easy as E=mc2. The very complexity of
climate science has been used to kick sand into the eyes of the public,
blinding us to alternative theories whether they are correct or not. The
science is so difficult to follow that no one can refute the IPCC without
discussing concepts most of the public don't have the time or desire to
learn. So by default the IPCC has owned the conversation and the playing
field. What's more, they have some big allies in supporting positions.
At the time of his original discovery Dr. Miskolczi was a contractor for
NASA and had published many times in renowned journals with his colleagues
there; <http://www.scribd.com/doc/25310277/Dr-Miskolczi-Resignation-Letter>
he resigned his position in 2005 when NASA refused to publish work
contradicting AGW.
Despite being blacklisted by the scientific community supporting AGW, he has
continued his research proving and refining his results. However, this same
community is also the one which peer reviews work like this. When a
scientist is tossed off this team, they can't get their work reviewed and
pushed to the press as being "peer reviewed." Despite this handicap
Miskolczi has persevered, just this month
<http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/c171tn430x43168v/?p=ad1e44ae5575
4e548ae474618bfb4102&pi=8> publishing yet again, this time proving with
observations that the greenhouse effect is actually stable.
Miskolczi does not appear to be saying that global warming or cooling
doesn't occur. Instead, he shows that CO2 does not and cannot increase the
surface temperature of the Earth independently of incoming energy. In his
paper he provides a <http://miskolczi.webs.com/Fig10.jpg> graph spanning 61
years from 1948-2008. It shows that the greenhouse effect remains constant
while CO2 concentrations have risen. Miskolczi has found physical proof that
the greenhouse effect works differently than previously thought and it isn't
affected by changes in carbon dioxide.
Lacking now is an honest scientific community's review of his work,
something hard to get once you have been kicked off the team.
The American and international press have also ignored this publication.
Though more articles appear daily contradicting the IPCC, this single
decisive discovery, if true, completely dismantles the theory of
Anthropogenic Global Warming. Amazingly it has yet to make the front page.
For more information: Dr. Miskloczi's latest paper can be found
<http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/c171tn430x43168v/?p=ad1e44ae5575
4e548ae474618bfb4102&pi=8> here: Ferenc Miskolczi: The stable stationary
value of the earth's global average atmospheric Planck-weighted
greenhouse-gas optical thickness (Energy & Environment Vol. 21 No 4, 2010
August Special Issue: Paradigms in Climate Research), and is available at
<http://multi-science.metapress.com/content/121493/?v=editorial>
Multi-Science Publishing Co., Great Britain.
Dr. Ferenc Miskolczi can be contacted at: [email protected]
<http://familysecuritymatters.org/> FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing
Editor Dianna Cotter is a Golden Key International Honor Society Member and
student at American Military University. She also writes for Examiner.com.
She currently resides in Oregon with her husband and three children. Dianna
Cotter can be contacted at [email protected].
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
