- Accuracy In Academia - http://www.academia.org <http://www.academia.org/>
-

Texas Textbooks Whitewash Shariah

Posted By Malcolm A. Kline On August 17, 2010 | 3
<http://www.academia.org/texas-textbooks-whitewash-shariah/print/#comments_c
ontrols>  Comments

Much attention, if not scorn, was heaped upon the Texas State Board of
Education (SBOE <http://www.academia.org../texas-sidestep/>  [1]) when it
tried to introduce some semblance of balance and accuracy in public school
textbooks. Actually, as we've noted, the revisions were rather tame. SBOE
<http://www.academia.org../texas-sidestep/>  [1]

For example, on May 22, 2010, April
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/21/texas-board-adopts-new-soci
al-studies-curriculum/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=n
ewsletter_must-read-stories-today>  Castro [2] of the Associated Press
reported that "The Texas State Board of Education adopted a social studies
and history curriculum Friday that amends or waters down the teaching of the
civil rights movement, slavery, America's relationship with the U.N. and
hundreds of other items."

Actually, the SBOE urged teachers to:

. "Analyze Abraham Lincoln's ideas about liberty, equality, union and
government as contained in his first and second inaugural addresses and the
Gettysburg Address and contrast them with the ideas contained in Jefferson
Davis's inaugural address. (8th grade U.S. History)"; and

. "Explain instances of institutional racism in American society.
(Sociology)"

It turns out that the revised standards are even much milder than what was
left in place. "The SBOE should now add that while U. S. History texts must
stop ignoring Christianity, high school World History books must cease
attacking it," the Educational Research Analysts of Longview, Texas assert.

Among other things, they score the texts for:

*       "In one instance, devoting 120 student text lines to Christian
beliefs, practices and holy writings but 248 (more than twice as many) to
those of Islam; and dwelling for 27 student text lines on Crusaders'
massacre of Muslims at Jerusalem in 1099 yet censoring Muslims' massacres of
Christians there in 1244 and at Antioch in 1268, implying that Christian
brutality and Muslim loss of life are significant but Islamic cruelty and
Christian deaths are not;

*       "In another instance, allotting 89 student text lines to Christian
beliefs, practices, and holy writings but 159 (almost twice as many) to
those of Islam; describing Crusaders' massacres of European Jews yet
ignoring the Muslim Tamerlane's massacre of perhaps 90,000 coreligionists at
Baghdad in 1401, and of perhaps 100,000 Indian POWs at Delhi in 1398; thrice
charging medieval Christians with sexism; and saying the Church 'laid the
foundations for anti-Semitism';

*       "In a third instance, spending 139 student text lines on Christian
beliefs, practices, and holy writings but 176 on those of Islam; claiming
Islam 'brought untold wealth to thousands and a better life to millions,'
while 'because of [Europeans' Christian] religious zeal.many peoples died
and civilizations were destroyed,' and contrasting 'the Muslim concern for
cleanliness' with Swedes in Russia who were 'the filthiest of God's
creatures.'"

Moreover, the reviewers found in the texts:

*       "Patterns of pejoratives toward Christians and superlatives toward
Muslims, calling Crusaders aggressors, 'violent attackers,' or 'invaders'
while euphemizing Muslim conquest of Christian lands as 'migrations' by
empire builders';

*       "Politically correct whitewashes of Islamic culture and stigmas on
Christian civilization, indicting the latter for the same practices (e.g.,
sexism, slavery, persecution of out-groups) that they treat
non-judgmentally, minimize, sugarcoat or censor in the former"; and

*       "Sanitized definitions of 'Jihad' that exclude religious intolerance
or military aggression against non-Muslims, even though Islamic sources
often include these among proper meanings of the term, which undergirds
current worldwide Muslim terrorism."

Yet and still, the abuses of Christianity alleged by these texts are
past-tense while those of the more radical Islamic regimes on the planet
continue to this day and include, but are not limited to, honor killings and
slavery itself. Moreover, as we have noted, the Texas standards are of a
piece with those laid out by the California
<http://www.academia.org../shariah-studies-by-stealth/>  [3] Department of
Education which actually tries to sanitize the law that, to one degree or
other governs all Muslim countries, to the point where the agency actually
gives Shariah credit for women's rights.

In one sense, geography is destiny as sales of textbooks in Texas and
California-our two largest states-determine publishers' offerings to public
schools nationwide. Thus, some version of all of the above could be coming
to a classroom near you, if it has not already arrived.

Malcolm A. Kline is the Executive Director of Accuracy
<http://academia.org/>  in Academia [4].

If you would like to comment on this article, e-mail [email protected]
[5].

  _____  

Article printed from Accuracy In Academia: http://www.academia.org
<http://www.academia.org/> 

URL to article: http://www.academia.org/texas-textbooks-whitewash-shariah/

URLs in this post:

[1] SBOE: http://www.academia.org <http://www.academia.org/>
../texas-sidestep/

[2] April Castro:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/21/texas-board-adopts-new-socia
l-studies-curriculum/?utm_source=newsletter
<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/may/21/texas-board-adopts-new-soci
al-studies-curriculum/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=n
ewsletter_must-read-stories-today>
&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_must-read-stories-today

[3] California : http://www.academia.org <http://www.academia.org/>
../shariah-studies-by-stealth/

[4] Accuracy in Academia: http://academia.org/

[5] [email protected]: mailto:[email protected]

 

Click here
<http://www.academia.org/texas-textbooks-whitewash-shariah/print/#Print>  to
print.

Copyright C 2009 Accuracy In Academia. All rights reserved.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to