The Problem of Inbreeding in Islam

Posted By Nicolai Sennels On September 19, 2010 @ 11:42 pm In Europe,
Lifestyle, Media, Middle East, Religion, Science & Technology, Sex, World
News | 23
<http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-problem-of-inbreeding-in-islam/?print=1#co
mments_controls>  Comments

[Editor's note: Several days ago, an interview with Nicolai Sennels by Jamie
Glazov on Muslim inbreeding was published but taken down soon after at the
request of the author, as it was decided that several themes needed to be
buffered by more evidence and research. The final product ended up working
best as an article by Nicolai Sennels himself, which is presented below].

There is a dire phenomenon rising in Europe that is crippling entire
societies and yet the continent sleeps, refusing not only to confront the
destructive elephant in the room, but also to admit its very existence. The
troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of Muslim
inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the left's control of the boundaries of debate is that
any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an
"Islamophobe" and a "racist." A person who dares to point at the pathology
of inbreeding in the Muslim community is accused of whipping up hatred
against Muslim people. But all of this could not be further from the truth.
To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend
innocent babies from birth defects. Fighting against this Islamic practice
stems from a pro-Muslim calling, since identifying destructive ideologies
and practices in Islam enables the protection of the Muslim people from
harm.

Massive inbreeding among Muslims has been going on since their prophet
allowed first-cousin marriages more than 50 generations (1,400 years) ago.
For many Muslims, therefore, intermarriage is regarded as being part of
their religion. In many Muslim communities, it is a source of social status
to marry one's daughter or son to his or her cousin. Intermarriage also
ensures that wealth is kept within the family. Islam's strict
authoritarianism plays a large role as well: keeping daughters and sons
close gives families more power to control and decide their choices and
lifestyles.

Westerners have a historical tradition of being ready to fight and die for
their country. Muslims, on the other hand, are bound together less by
patriotism, but mainly by family relations and religion. Intermarrying to
protect the family and community from outside non-Islamic influence is much
more important to Muslims living in a Western nation than integrating into
that nation and supporting it.

Today, 70 percent of all Pakistanis are inbred and in Turkey the amount is
between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 "More
<http://fpn.dk/liv/krop_valvare/article1616165.ece>  stillbirths among
immigrants [1]"). A rough estimate reveals that close to half
<http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17/table/T1>  of
everybody living in the Arab world is inbred [2]. A large percentage of the
parents that are blood related come from families where intermarriage has
been a tradition for generations.

A BBC
<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms>
investigation [3] in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of
the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin. The
<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms>
Times of India affirmed [3] that "this is thought to be linked to the
probability that a British Pakistani family is at least 13 times more likely
than the general population to have children with recessive genetic
disorders."

The BBC
<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms> 's
research also discovered [3] that while British Pakistanis accounted for
just 3.4% of all births in Britain, they accounted for 30% of all British
children with recessive disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality. It
is not a surprise, therefore, that, in response to this evidence, a
<http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms>
Labour Party MP has called for a ban [3] on first-cousin marriage.

Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding
is a 100 percent increase
<http://fpn.dk/liv/krop_valvare/article1616165.ece>  in the risk of
stillbirths [1]. One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the
risk that the child dies during labor increases by 50
<http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/308/6929/659>  percent [4]. The risk
of death due to autosomal recessive disorders - e.g., cystic fibrosis and
spinal muscular atrophy - is 18 times higher. Risk of death due to
malformations is 10 times higher. Mental health is also at risk: the
probability of <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2738415/>
depression is higher [5] in communities where consanguine marriages are also
high. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental
<http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb02447.x/abstr
act>  and physical retardation [6] and schizophrenic
<http://books.google.com/books?id=0xHOzXpELE8C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=%22The+cl
oser+the+blood+relative,+the+more+likely+was+there+to+be+a+schizophrenic+ill
ness.%22&source=bl&ots=bJEwf5BqBA&sig=6MFg24y0Okh6CxsgiMVH9VqJOSQ&hl=en&ei=K
idfTO3uFYb-Ob7vvbEP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAA#v
=onepage&q=%22The%20closer%20the%20blood%20relative%2C%20the%20more%20likely
%20was%20there%20to%20be%20a%20schizophrenic%20illness.%22&f=false>  illness
[7].

And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if
one's parents are cousins, intelligence
<http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/rawdataupload/upload/insa/INSA_1/20005bbc_407.p
df>  goes down 10-16 IQ points [8]. The risk of having an IQ lower than
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC392897/?page=1>  70 [9]
(criterion for being "retarded") increases 400 percent among children from
cousin marriages. An
<http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/rawdataupload/upload/insa/INSA_1/20005bbc_407.p
df>  academic paper [8] published in the Indian National Science Academy
found that "the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation,
social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are
significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies." Another study
<http://www.springerlink.com/content/j65457u2532t1751/>  [10] found that
Indian Muslim school boys whose parents were first cousins tested
significantly lower than boys whose parents were unrelated in a non-verbal
test on intelligence.

It is estimated that one third
<http://www.bt.dk/nyheder/indvandreres-indavl-koster-millioner>  of all
handicapped people in Copenhagen [11] have a foreign background. Sixty four
<http://www.bkchefer.dk/uploads/File/Rockwoolfonden.pdf>  percent of school
children [12] in Denmark with Arabic parents are illiterate after 10 years
in the Danish school system. The same study concludes that in reading
ability, mathematics, and science, the pattern is the same: "The bilingual
(largely Muslim) immigrants' skills are exceedingly poor compared to their
Danish classmates."

These problems within Islam bring many detriments to Western countries.
Expenses related to mentally and physically handicapped Muslim immigrants,
for instance, severely drain the budgets and resources of our societies.
Look at Denmark, for example: one third of the budget for the country's
schools is spent on children with special needs. Muslim children are grossly
overrepresented among these children. More
<http://www.nordjyske.dk/indland/forside.aspx?ctrl=10&data=2%2c3195839%2c5%2
c2&count=1>  than half of all children [13] in schools for children with
mental and physical handicaps in Copenhagen are foreigners - of whom Muslims
are by far the largest group. One study concludes that "foreigners
<http://www.bt.dk/nyheder/indvandreres-indavl-koster-millioner>  inbreeding
costs our municipalities millions [11]" because of the many handicapped
children and adults.

What must our role be as a humanitarian society to this rising crisis? We
know that the greatest concern among pregnant women and their husbands is
for their child to be healthy. It is not difficult to imagine the sorrow and
stress among interrelated couples who are forced to marry and pressured to
have children. Is it not our duty to fight for the rights of these human
beings subjected to such barbaric and inhuman predicaments?

What is it we can do?

Denmark is a pioneering example of where to begin: in order to counter
forced marriages, the country does not allow Danish citizens to marry
foreigners younger than 24 years old. It also offers non-Western immigrants
up to 15 thousand euros or 20 thousand dollars to emigrate back to their
countries of origin. Immigrants who are not Danish citizens are banished
from Denmark if they commit violent crimes. The state does not support
families economically for having more than the country's average amount of
children. This prevents foreigners from coming to Denmark who have plans to
have a lot of children and live off the state's child support system. The
country also denies resident permits to foreigners who are marrying their
cousin in Denmark. Right now, the country is working on a complete halt to
immigration from countries that are not oriented towards Western values
(mainly Muslim countries).

We must simply forbid intermarriage among first cousins. Doing so will not
only help slow down all the terrible consequences of inbreeding, but also
prevent Muslims who insist on practicing this damaging practice from moving
to our countries.

Let us keep in mind that Muslims are the first - though maybe not the
biggest - victims of Islam. As long as we know that our motivation is to
help them, then our conscience is clear in the face of the left's
accusations that we are somehow "anti-Muslim" when we show our concern about
Muslim babies who are born with mental and physical defects - and about
their parents who endure endless suffering and worry. In fact, it is the
left's callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes
who is truly "anti-Muslim."

As long as we stick to facts, have a compassionate motivation, and are still
able to be brave, we can be certain that not only are we right to reach out
to protect Muslim people, but that in doing so we are also protecting
ourselves from destroying our own basic humanistic and Western values while
struggling against anti-human and aggressive practices and ideologies.

  _____  

Article printed from Pajamas Media: http://pajamasmedia.com

URL to article:
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-problem-of-inbreeding-in-islam/

URLs in this post: 

[1] More stillbirths among immigrants:
http://fpn.dk/liv/krop_valvare/article1616165.ece

[2] half of everybody living in the Arab world is inbred:
http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17/table/T1

[3] BBC investigation:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1298135,curpg-1.cms

[4] increases by 50 percent:
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/308/6929/659

[5] probability of depression is higher:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2738415/

[6] mental and physical retardation:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1997.tb02447.x/abstra
ct

[7] schizophrenic illness:
http://books.google.com/books?id=0xHOzXpELE8C&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=%22The+clo
ser+the+blood+relative,+the+more+likely+was+there+to+be+a+schizophrenic+illn
ess.%22&source=bl&ots=bJEwf5BqBA&sig=6MFg24y0Okh6CxsgiMVH9VqJOSQ&hl=en&ei=Ki
dfTO3uFYb-Ob7vvbEP&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBIQ6AEwAA#v=
onepage&q=%22The%20closer%20the%20blood%20relative%2C%20the%20more%20likely%
20was%20there%20to%20be%20a%20schizophrenic%20illness.%22&f=false

[8] intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points:
http://www.new.dli.ernet.in/rawdataupload/upload/insa/INSA_1/20005bbc_407.pd
f

[9] IQ lower than 70:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC392897/?page=1

[10] Another study: http://www.springerlink.com/content/j65457u2532t1751/

[11] one third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen:
http://www.bt.dk/nyheder/indvandreres-indavl-koster-millioner

[12] Sixty four percent of school children:
http://www.bkchefer.dk/uploads/File/Rockwoolfonden.pdf

[13] More than half of all children:
http://www.nordjyske.dk/indland/forside.aspx?ctrl=10&data=2%2c3195839%2c5%2c
2&count=1

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to