http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.7523/pub_detail.asp

 

October 1, 2010


Take Another Look at Tony Blair - Who Maybe Got It Right


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.31/author_detail.asp> Dr.
Laina Farhat-Holzman


Print This <javascript:%20printVersion()>  E-mail This
<javascript:%20emailVersion()>  



 <javascript:void(0);> http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/images/share.png


ShareThis <javascript:void(0);> 

 

Comments
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/comments.asp?id=7523>
(0)

History does not necessarily validate contemporary assessments of famous
politicians. Tony Blair, one of the most popular British Prime Ministers
ever, left office under a cloud of opprobrium, not only by his own
countrymen, but American progressives as well. He was condemned for having
supported the war in Iraq (the 2003 war) and was dubbed "George Bush's
Poodle." This is a sad end to what was a dazzling career-but maybe it is not
the last word.

In Philadelphia (September 13, 2010), Blair received the Liberty Medal for
his global human rights work and commitment to international conflict
resolution. The focus of this annual award is the promotion of liberty
worldwide. Blair was honored for his work with the Tony Blair Faith
Foundation, promoting religious tolerance; for his efforts to improve
governance in Africa (an endless tar-pit); and for advancing peace in
Northern Ireland and the Middle East. 

 

Blair is also on book tour with his memoir, A Journey, the receipt of which
is not as uniformly happy as his award ceremony.  British and Irish anti-war
protesters blast Blair for working with the Americans and taking a leaf from
Iraq, throw shoes and eggs at him. What does Blair say in his own defense? 

Although some American columnists gave snide reviews of his memoir, Charley
Rose conducted an enlightening interview with Blair. Blair conducted himself
with honor. Does he regret his decision to take Britain into the Iraq War?
Of course, he agonizes over the loss of life-both our soldiers and Iraqis as
well. However, he still believes that it is a noble cause to free people
from horrific rule. It is impossible to regret the removal and death of
Saddam Hussein and his monstrous sons.

He was asked if he had known then what he knows now about weapons of mass
destruction, would he still have supported the invasion? Blair said
something that is not popular today: that although we did not find WMDs when
we went in, that does not mean that there had not been such weapons; they
may have been spirited out in Russian convoys, just before we went in. (I
believe this too.)  And he noted that had we not gone in, Saddam would have
restarted his programs; all the scientists and facilities were in place and
just needed a go-ahead. (I heard this from an Iraqi physicist who defected
to the US as well.)

Blair obviously believes that all people deserve to have decent governance.
I would like that too-but I don't think we few can take on the billions of
people living in ignorance who are not ready for participatory governance.
But Blair is tireless.

Let us remember how unpopular Harry Truman was when he stepped down as
President. This man, without even a college degree,  the successor to the
dazzling Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was a senator so obscure that most
people  never gave him a thought until he was thrust into the role by the
death of Roosevelt. What we did not know then was how sterling and diligent
was his character-and what a great constitutional expert he was (on his own,
not courtesy of university education).  Both Democrats and Republicans now
embrace his administration as a model presidency. 

Ronald Regan was regarded by most well-educated liberals as an idiot who
only knew Hollywood. We have since learned how bright he really was by
reading his writing, particularly his correspondence. This was a thinking
man.  And the same was true for President Eisenhower, who was thought to be
a pleasant dolt. He was not.

We have another situation today in how President Obama is regarded. He
started his administration with adulation that approached the embarrassing:
that he could walk on water. Today, just two years later, he is attacked
(for different reasons) by both the far right and the far left. 

How this landmark presidency will look in a few decades will be very
different from the heat and no light of today. We need a little distance to
see our leaders fairly-and outside of the coziness of mob think.

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/> FamilySecurityMatters.org
Contributing Editor Dr. Laina Farhat-Holzman is an historian, lecturer, and
author who also writes for the Santa Cruz Sentinel. You may contact her at
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] or
<http://www.globalthink.net/> http://www.globalthink.net/.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to