http://www.getreligion.org/2010/10/the-missing-places-of-jewish-worship/

 

Sunday, October 31, 2010

 <http://www.getreligion.org/2010/10/the-missing-places-of-jewish-worship/>
The missing 'places of Jewish worship'

Posted by Brad A. Greenberg

 
<http://view.picapp.com/pictures.photo/news/remains-vigilant-wake/image/1009
0942?term=terror+yemen> LOS ANGELES, CA - OCTOBER 30: Airline workers load
cargo into an All Nippon Airways passenger plane at Los Angeles
International Airport on October 30, 2010 in Los Angeles, California. The
United States remains vigilant in the wake of an exposed terror plot.
Packages containing explosives were sent from Yemen and addressed to
synagogues in Chicago but were intercepted yesterday before they could reach
their destinations. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)

A lot more details have come to light as the international probe into a
terror threat emanating from Yemen has widened. But some details should have
been much clearer from the start.

One of the early oddities with this story was that the Chicago synagogues to
which the bombs were addressed were repeatedly referred to as "places of
Jewish Worship."

I know that President Obama, in his press conference, called
<http://www.philly.com/inquirer/front_page/20101030_Discovery_of_suspicious_
cargo_prompts_Philadelphia_search_of_UPS_planes.html>  them places of Jewish
worship. But reporters often - maybe not often enough - translate
bureaucratese into more precise words that can be more easily understood by
readers.

These weren't Jewish community centers, so it's pretty safe to just identify
them as synagogues. Thats the Jewish version of a church.

Even odder, though, was the initial story from The New York Times. It was an
earlier version of this story
<http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/30/us/30plane.html>  that was titled "Terror
Alert Touched Off by Suspicious Air Shipments." The earlier version, which
you can still find on online message boards, went straight from talking
about the "widening investigation into suspicious packages" to this:

Federal officials warned synagogues in the Chicago metropolitan area to be
on alert, said Linda Haase, associate vice president of the Jewish
Federation of Metropolitan Chicago.

"We were notified about this earlier this morning," Ms. Haase said in an
interview. "We are taking appropriate precautions and we're advising local
synagogues to do the same."

By the afternoon, Jewish institutions throughout the nation were being told
by the Anti-Defamation League to step up their security. "Law enforcement
asked us to reach out to the Jewish community to be on alert, to be
vigilant, in particular for packages," Steven Sheinberg, the director of
community security at the League said in an interview. "We have heard of no
specific threat, but these things are unfolding and progressing."

Knowing what we know now, it's no surprise at all that this NYT story added
such context. But in this version of the story it was quite the non
sequitor. Until the above paragraphs, there had been no mention of Jews,
synagogues or places of Jewish worship.

In other words, this story said Jews were on alert but didn't say why. And
why, after all, is often the most important question a story should answer.

Have we really gotten to the point that any terror threat from the Middle
East is presumed to target American Jews? Or was this just an editing flub
in the rush to get this story online as quickly as possible?

It may have been the latter. When I sent this story to the GetReligion team,
Bobby - Go Rangers! - replied with an NYT news alert that mentioned "places
of Jewish worship."

The funny thing was that the link included in the news alert redirected to
the NYTimes.com home page. Where the earlier version of the story I just
discussed was prominently featured.

Written by: Brad A. Greenberg
<http://www.getreligion.org/author/brad-a-greenberg/>  on October 31, 2010.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to