http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39997

 

The Law as Weapon

by Robert Spencer

11/16/2010

 

Islamic supremacists are at war with freedom of speech in the West: The
57-government Organization of the Islamic Conference has been campaigning
for years now at the United Nations to compel Western states to criminalize
"religious hatred"-that is, honest discussions of how Islamic jihadists use
Islamic texts and teachings to justify violence and to recruit peaceful
Muslims to their cause. One little-noted weapon in this war is the
courtroom: using libel and defamation laws as weapons to cow critics and
intimidate them into silence. My courageous and indefatigable colleague
Pamela Geller is the latest target.

Muslim foes of the freedom of speech have used this weapon frequently over
the years. The Hamas-linked Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has
sued many, and has threatened legal action against many more. In 2006 CAIR
dropped a $1.35 million libel suit against Andrew Whitehead of Anti-CAIR,
who had called CAIR a "terrorist front organization," after Whitehead's
lawyers asked probing questions about the group during the discovery
process. 

In another notable case, billionaire Saudi Khalid bin Mahfouz sued writer
Rachel Ehrenfeld in libel-friendly Britain for writing in her book Funding
Evil that he was involved in funding Hamas and al-Qaeda. Bin Mahfouz denied
that he had knowingly given money to either. This case became the foundation
for new laws protecting American writers from libel rulings in other
countries.

Now Ohio lawyer Omar Tarazi has filed a $10-million defamation lawsuit
against Geller for elements of her reporting on the case of Rifqa Bary, the
teenage girl who kicked off a year-long custody battle when she fled from
her home in fear for her life after her Muslim father discovered her
conversion to Christianity. (The battle ended when Rifqa turned eighteen and
was free to live on her own as a Christian.)

Tarazi was the lawyer for Rifqa Bary's parents. Tarazi objected to Geller's
referring to him as their "CAIR-appointed lawyer," although his connections
to CAIR had actually been reported by others earlier, and there was
photographic evidence that CAIR was extensively involved in advising Rifqa
Bary's parents. Geller's lawyers have filed a motion to dismiss based on the
fact that her reporting about the case included "accurate reports of
statements of others" and "true statements simply." But there are larger
implications of the suit itself.

Geller explains that with his suit, Tarazi is "trying to shut me up, and
those like me." She notes that his suit, if successful, will also have the
effect of discouraging apostates from Islam, like Rifqa Bary, from going
public. Thus, she says, with this suit he is "using our judicial system to
shut down free speech and impose the Sharia"-a system of fundamentalist
laws, one of which forbids Muslims to leave Islam on penalty of death.

"Rifqa Bary," says Geller, "was a rebuke to all of the lies of Islamic
supremacist narrative," since she brought to national attention the Islamic
death penalty for apostates, which Islamic apologists in the West routinely
deny even exists. The Rifqa Bary affair, Geller explains, was a test case:
Would Islamic supremacists be able to manipulate the American legal system
to compel someone wishing to leave Islam to return to it, or would her
freedom of conscience be upheld? 

When Rifqa turned eighteen without having been forced back into her parents'
home, CAIR and its allied forces suffered a major setback. "Her victory,"
said Geller, "is a stunning defeat for them and they will take it out on
anyone who helped her." 

Tarazi's lawsuit is a flagrant attempt at legal bullying, and its goal is
obvious. With her ongoing efforts to shed light on the human rights abuses
inherent in Sharia, including the death penalty for apostates from Islam,
Pamela Geller is today one of the foremost opponents of Islamic supremacism.
That is why its adherents are so desperate to silence her, for to do so
would be to silence one of the foremost voices of the anti-jihad resistance.


In the face of this attempt at legal intimidation, Geller is defiant: "It
won't work. We won't stop." We may only hope that the American legal system
is up to a similarly stout-hearted defense of freedom and human rights.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to