http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574

 


How the Chandlers' release could spur Somali pirate kidnappings


By Mike Pflanz, Scott Baldauf Mike Pflanz, Scott Baldauf – Mon Nov 15, 4:05 pm 
ET

Nairobi, Kenya; and Johannesburg, South Africa – For the last 388 days, Paul 
and  <http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574> Rachel Chandler slept 
in tents in the Somali bush, surviving on goat meat and tinned spaghetti.

On Monday morning, they woke in the colonial-era splendor of the British High 
Commissioner’s mansion in Nairobi, and ate a full English breakfast served by 
white-jacketed waiters.

These details are among the avalanche of media coverage of the retired British 
couple’s release after more than a year as hostages to  
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574> Somali pirates. On one 
British 24-hour news channel, the story even pushed the release of Aung San Suu 
Kyi off top billing.

But that attention – and, more importantly the fact that an estimated ransom of 
$800,000 bought their freedom – has set a “bad precedent” that could endanger 
others, analysts say.

RELATED: Top 5 high-profile captures by Somali pirates

"While we are all relieved that the innocent couple is now fine, the matter of 
the achievement of their freedom, through payment of ransom, sets a bad 
precedent for others,â€

“You can add value to what you capture if you abuse them, if you create 
heartache in Britain or wherever they come from, and someone is going to come 
up with the money for their release, and someone is going to profit from this."

The problem with media coverageMr. and Mrs. Chandler, both from the south of 
England, were kidnapped in the dead of night last October as they slept aboard 
their 38-foot yacht, moored in the Seychelles archipelago more than 800 miles 
east of the Somali coast and far from the pirates’ usual hunting grounds. 
Almost instantly, the twists and turns of their story became front-page news, 
especially in Britain.

The attention became so great that the couple’s family went to court and won 
a legal injunction barring further coverage until they were freed. The 
reasoning being that in a vacuum devoid of publicity, the pirates would begin 
to think that the world had forgotten about the couple, that their value was 
diminishing, and that a deal should be struck quickly.

But now that the legal prohibitions have been lifted, other pirates seeing the 
media’s reaction will think again.

Usually, ransoms are paid by commercial insurance firms, and ships and their 
crew are freed without fanfare. For the Chandlers, there was no company to foot 
the bill.  <http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574> Somalia’s 
government holds little sway over the pirates, and relatives knew there would 
be no British special forces commando raid. So relatives hired international 
specialists based in London,  
<http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574> Dubai, and Nairobi to 
coordinate the release. 

“Throughout the protracted discussions…it has been a difficult task for the 
family to get across the message that these were two retired people on a 
sailing trip on a small private yacht,” the couple’s relatives said in a 
statement. “[They are] not part of a major commercial enterprise involving tens 
of millions of pounds of assets."

Somali diaspora kicked in fundsThe rest of the ransom was apparently gathered 
by the Somali diaspora – the first time this has happened.

“The influence of the diaspora can be hugely influential for whatever goes on 
in Somalia,” says Roger Middleton, a piracy expert at the Chatham House 
think-tank in London.

“This makes sense. The diaspora has to live in the West, they do business in 
the West, and the embarrassment of the pirate story doesn't help them. Somalis 
do certainly face discrimination, so maybe there is some logic if they did 
raise money for the Chandlers' release."

But a precedent has now been set – that no matter how often a hostage 
negotiator tells a pirate there is no more money, some will be found. Friends 
and well-wishers raised roughly half of the much-diminished ransom demand.

Somali government paid 'substantial' amountComplicating matters is the fact 
that Somalia’s  <http://news.yahoo.com/s/csm/20101115/wl_csm/343574> 
Transitional Federal Government has said that it helped raise the final tranche 
of the ransom that bought the Chandlers' freedom.

Mohamed Abdullahi-Omaar, Somalia’s foreign minister, confirmed that “a 
substantial” amount was paid, but would not comment further “given that there 
are other hostages still in Somalia." 

That is the point of concern, according to Mr. Pham of the National Committee 
on American Foreign Policy. It creates an incentive telling pirates holding 
hostages without insurance – like pleasure sailors, rather than 
oil-supertankers – that the government will step in. 

“We've started a vicious cycle here, and how to extricate ourselves remains to 
be seen,” Pham says. 

"I think you have to make it illegal to pay ransoms. If the company can't pay, 
then pirates lose the incentive to hijack ships. In the long run it will be 
better for everyone." 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to