http://www.jewishworldreview.com/1110/glick111610.php3
Nov 16, 2010 / 9 Kislev, 5771
What the Palestinian Authority buys with your tax dollars
By Caroline B. Glick
http://jewishworldreview.com/images/money_toilet_paper_cover.jpg
In funding the PA, the US contravenes its own laws. Only read this article
if you don't have anger management issues
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Two weeks ago, a Palestinian from
Bethlehem was arrested by the US-financed and trained Palestinian Authority
security forces. He was charged with "carrying out commercial transactions
with residents of a hostile state."
No, he was not buying uranium from Iran. His purported crime was purchasing
wood products from an Israeli community located beyond the 1949 armistice
lines.
Denied bail by the US-funded PA magistrate's court in Bethlehem, he has been
remanded to custody pending the conclusion of his trial.
This man's arrest is part of what the unelected, US-supported Palestinian
Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has touted as his "National Honor Fund." The
goal of this project is to ban all economic contact between Palestinians and
Jews who live and work beyond the 1949 armistice lines. As far as the
supposedly moderate Fayyad is concerned, those Jews and Israel generally
comprise the "hostile state," that the Palestinians under Fayyad's
leadership are being compelled to boycott.
Speaking to The Jerusalem Post, Palestinian Labor Minister Ahmed Majdalani
said the PA hopes that by the end of the year all the thousands of
Palestinians who are employed in Israeli communities in Judea and Samaria
will quit their jobs. What he didn't mention is that if they don't quit,
they will be arrested.
According to PA Economics Minister Hassan Abu Libdeh, since the start of
Fayyad's campaign, the PA has confiscated $1 million worth of Israeli
products including foods, cosmetics and hardware from Palestinian stores.
Fayyad's measures come on top of previously enacted PA measures like
imposing the death penalty on Palestinians who sell land to Jews. Less than
two months ago, the PA reaffirmed that it will continue to execute any
Palestinian who commits this "crime."
There is no way to credibly claim that these actions advance either the
cause of peaceful coexistence or Palestinian economic prosperity. Yet it is
precisely in the hope of advancing these goals that the US government funds
the PA.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/../cols2/dingbat.gif
DESPITE HIS campaign to boycott Israel and punish Palestinians with economic
ties to the Jewish state, Fayyad is the US's favorite Palestinian. Since PA
President Mahmoud Abbas appointed Fayyad to lead the rump Fatah government
in Judea and Samaria after Hamas took over the Gaza Strip, US aid to the PA
has increased by more than 700 percent. Most of this aid has gone to
propping up Fayyad.
The US directly finances his budget. It funds and trains a Palestinian
military. And it subsidizes his programs to build governmental institutions
that loyally carry out his anti-Israel policies.
Last Wednesday, during a joint press conference with Fayyad, Secretary of
State Hillary Clinton announced the US will give the PA an additional $150
million in aid to supplement the $400 million in financial assistance that
President Barack Obama pledged in June. This supplement comes in response to
Fayyad's claim that he needs $500 million to close his budget shortfall.
According to the Congressional Research Service, the PA is the largest
recipient of foreign assistance in the world. According to Bloomberg, it
received $1.2 billion in 2009 and will receive $1.8 billion by the end of
the year.
The US provided the PA with $500.9 million in 2009 and, before Clinton's
announcement, was scheduled to provide it with $550 million in 2011. This
assistance does not include US financial support for UNRWA, an agency
devoted exclusively to providing welfare benefits to Palestinians while
subordinating itself to a Palestinian political agenda. The US is the single
largest donor to UNRWA. Last year the $268 million US taxpayers gave the UN
agency constituted 27 percent of UNRWA's budget.
Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), who is expected to become the
chairwoman of the House Foreign Relations Committee in the next Congress,
responded negatively to Clinton's announced expansion of US aid to the PA.
In a statement released by her office last Thursday, Ros-Lehtinen derided
the assistance as a "bailout."
She further commented, "It is deeply disturbing that the administration is
continuing to bail out the Palestinian leadership when they continue to fail
to meet their commitments, under international agreements and requirements
outlined in US law, including dismantling the Palestinian terrorist
infrastructure, combating corruption, stopping anti-Israel and anti-Semitic
incitement and recognizing Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state."
Ros-Lehtinen authored the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006, which
conditioned US assistance to the PA on, among other things, "publicly
acknowledge[ing] the Jewish state of Israel's right to exist."
While on the mark, Ros-Lehtinen's statement only scratches the surface of
how contrary to US law and the goals of Palestinian economic development and
peace US financial assistance to the Palestinians truly is.
Take US security assistance to the Palestinians. The US responded to the
Hamas takeover in Gaza by massively increasing its military assistance to
Fatah. According to the CRS, between 2007 and August 2010, US assistance to
the PA security services totaled $400 million. They received $100 million in
2010 and are set to receive $150 million in 2011. This assistance has paid
for the training and outfitting of 400 Presidential Guards and 2,700
soldiers in the National Security Forces. The US plans to train five
additional 500-man NSF battalions.
The CRS report acknowledged these forces have improved the law and order
situation in Judea and Samaria. But it also asserted that "uncertainty
remains over the durability of these improvements and their connection with
broader Palestinian economic and civil society development and with progress
on Israeli-Palestinian negotiations as well as over the willingness and
ability of the forces to incapacitate militants."
Indeed, there is little reason to believe that these US-trained forces will
not join forces with Hamas and turn their guns on Israel in the future.
Since 1996, PA security services have taken a leading role in the terror war
against Israel.
Concerned about the threat these forces pose, particularly in light of
Fayyad's rejection of Israel's right to exist, earlier this year OC Central
Command Maj.-Gen. Avi Mizrahi warned that these US-trained forces constitute
a qualitative jump in the Palestinians' war fighting capabilities against
Israel.
As he put it, "This is a well trained force, better equipped than its
predecessors and trained by the US. The significance of this is that at the
start of a new battle [with the Palestinians] the price that we will pay
will be higher. A force like this one can shut down a built-up area with
four snipers. This is deadly. These aren't the fighters we faced in Jenin
[in 2002]. This is an infantry force that will be fighting us and we need to
take this into account. They have offensive capabilities and we aren't
expecting them to give up."
Then there is the US direct assistance to the PA's operating budget. The US
has provided $350 million in direct budgetary assistance to the PA in the
past two years. There are three problems with this aid.
First, it is far from clear that the PA needs this assistance. According to
the International Monetary Fund and the Palestinian Central Bureau of
Statistics, in 2009 real GDP in Judea and Samaria and the Gaza Strip grew by
6.8 percent, (8.5% in Judea and Samaria). The report also claimed that
unemployment declined. So if things are going so well, why is it necessary
for foreign donor countries to increase their direct assistance to Fayyad's
budget?
Second, given Fayyad's rejection of free trade principles, particularly as
they relate to Israel, the PA's largest trading partner, it is hard to see
how his economic leadership is credible. As the failed stimulus packages in
the US have shown clearly, government bureaucracies do not create jobs. That
is the work of the private sector. And yet, Fayyad is barring Palestinians
from having trade ties with their most important business partners and
commercial market. This is not the behavior of a leader who is interested in
facilitating sustainable economic growth.
Finally, the simple truth is that it is impossible to prevent US budgetary
assistance to the PA from financing Hamas, in contravention of US law. Each
month Fayyad transfers funds to Hamas-controlled Gaza to pay the salaries of
PA employees there. Fayyad has argued that this assistance cannot be
considered material aid to Hamas, since the employees are employed by the
PA. But this is nonsense.
These employees serve at the pleasure of Hamas. Paying their salaries
contravenes US law as well as international law, which prohibits states from
providing any assistance whatsoever to areas controlled by terrorists. This
is true even if the actual money he transfers to Gaza comes from other
income sources. Without the direct US budgetary assistance, he wouldn't be
able to funnel money to Gaza.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/../cols2/dingbat.gif
PROVIDING DIRECT budgetary assistance to Fayyad isn't the only way the US
finances Hamas. It also contributes to Hamas by funding UNRWA. US assistance
to UNRWA has doubled in the last four years, largely as a way of avoiding
providing direct aid to Hamas. Yet the CRS report notes, "In Gaza, most
observers acknowledge that the role of UNRWA in providing basic services
(i.e., food, health care, education) takes much of the governing burden off
Hamas."
In defending its assistance to UNRWA, the State Department told Congress
that the aid "directly contributes to the US strategic interest of meeting
the humanitarian needs of the Palestinians, while promoting their
self-sufficiency. UNRWA plays a stabilizing role in the Middle East through
its assistance programs, serving as an important counterweight to
extremists."
But the fact of the matter is that UNRWA employees are Hamas members and
sympathizers. And despite the State Department's claim that it has adopted
safeguards to ensure that US assistance is not transferred to individuals
and groups with links to Hamas and other terror groups, UNRWA's checks
against terrorism are restricted to checking a UN list of banned terror
groups that includes only al-Qaida and the Taliban. As the CRS report noted,
UNRWA's terror screening list "does not include Hamas, Hizbullah or most
other militant groups that operate in UNRWA's surroundings." In other words,
UNRWA continues to employ terrorists, and its current procedures do nothing
to prevent that.
A Framework of Cooperation agreement signed this year between UNRWA and the
US sets out 15 steps for UNRWA to expand its terror screening. But the
agreement is nonbinding. Moreover, its provisions in no way block
terror-linked individuals or groups from receiving aid from UNRWA.
In truth, given the PA's refusal to recognize Israel's right to exist or
take sustained, decisive action against terrorism, there is really no way
for the US to continue funding it without breaking its own laws. But
acknowledging this state of affairs would involve admitting that the peace
process is a lie and that any Palestinian state that is formed today will be
a terrorist state at war with Israel.
The incoming Congress might want to consider these basic truths before it
approves further aid to Fayyad and his moderate government.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
