http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/15/AR2010111501
888_pf.html

 

Afghan officials dismiss talk of rift with U.S. after Karzai criticism

By David Nakamura
Washington Post Foreign Service
Monday, November 15, 2010; 6:52 PM 

KABUL - Afghan government officials sought Monday to contain damaging
fallout from President Hamid Karzai's criticism of the U.S. military's use
of special operation raids, insisting that the critique does not signal a
deepening rift between strategic partners. 

The attempt to defuse the controversy came as U.S. Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton called the raids, which are used to kill and capture
Taliban commanders, a "key component" of the war. 

Clinton told reporters in Washington that the Obama administration shares
Karzai's concerns that the raids can be invasive for Afghan communities. But
she added, "We believe that the use of intelligence-driven, precision,
targeted operations against high-value insurgents and their networks is a
key component of our comprehensive civilian-military operations. . . . There
is no question they are having a significant impact on the insurgent
leadership and the networks that they operate." 

Clinton's comments signaled that the United States is not prepared to alter
its tactics despite Karzai's call for an end to the raids in an interview
with The Washington Post
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/13/AR201011130
4001.html>  on Saturday. Gen. David H. Petraeus, the top U.S. and NATO
commander in Afghanistan
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/countries/afghanistan.html?nav=e
l> , was astonished and disappointed
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/14/AR201011140
4549.html?hpid=topnews>  that Karzai aired his views publicly, according to
Afghan and U.S. officials. 

The general reportedly did not attend a long-scheduled meeting with Karzai
on Sunday, officials said, though Karzai spokesman Waheed Omer said Monday
that no such meeting had been planned. At a news conference, Omer said the
president's comments were not intended as a vote of no-confidence in
Petraeus, but rather were a sign of a "maturing partnership" in which both
sides are willing to speak frankly. 

"This kind of debate has always been there, and as the relationship is
maturing, there is room for substantive reflection on both sides," Omer
said. He added that Afghan and NATO officials agree on most of the current
NATO strategy, but that spirited debate on specific issues is "something
that is going to take us to another level of partnership as we are hoping to
arrive at in the near future." 

The growing strife between the Karzai government and the U.S. military came
as Taliban leader Mohammad Omar vowed that the insurgents would not
negotiate a peace settlement, despite reports in recent weeks that some
Taliban factions have begun preliminary talks. 

In a statement released on the eve of the Islamic holiday Eid al-Adha, Omar
called peace talks "mere propaganda" and said that the insurgents are
prepared to "compel the enemy to come out from their hideouts and then crush
them through tactical raids." 

He also asked Muslims to offer financial support to the Taliban, imploring
them to "perform your obligation of fraternity in your material wealth." 

The back-and-forth between Karzai and Petraeus comes days before NATO
leaders, including President Obama, are scheduled to hold a summit in Lisbon
that will begin to set a timetable for transition. The process will involve
turning portions of Afghanistan security control over to Afghan forces. 

The summit, which Karzai is slated to attend, will also set 2014 as a
deadline for the end of coalition combat operations and will showcase a
long-term NATO-Afghan partnership. 

In calling for an end to the night raids - which are controversial in
Afghanistan because of the considerable risk of civilian casualties - Karzai
struck at the heart of Petraeus's counterinsurgency strategy. Petraeus
believes killing top Taliban commanders in the raids is a key part of
showing significant progress when the White House reviews its Afghanistan
policy next month. 

Omer, Karzai's spokesman, said the president's office has contacted
Petraeus's staff and "clarified to NATO that the president is talking within
the framework of transition." 

"When he talks about reduction of military activities and talks about the
reduction of military force in Afghanistan, the president makes it
conditioned on the ability of the Afghan security forces to take
responsibility," Omer added. "If everything in that interview is read within
the overall context, we are sure that it is not much we disagree upon." 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to